Found Deceased SC - Brittanee Drexel, 17, Myrtle Beach, 25 April 2009 - #4

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #701
No worries....I understand. Thanks for the response. :)
 
  • #702
Here is a list started by January and cc81 of the Myspaces:
Brittanee Marie Drexel -17- missing child
Dawn D. -36- mother - www.myspace.com/bemibabe
Chad D. -37- adopted father - http://www.myspace.com/173449572
John K. -32- birth father - http://www.myspace.com/johnkahyaoglu
Michael W. -34- moms current bf - http://www.myspace.com/mdwpatriot
John G. -19- Britt's bf - http://www.myspace.com/69123240
John H. -20- friend of the Drexels who filed police report - http://www.myspace.com/hahn83
Tarah V.F. -19- Friend of Britt's who started Facebook group - http://www.myspace.com/xotarahxo

those on the trip to MB
Boys:
Peter B. -20- http://www.myspace.com/peteybroz
Philip W. -20- http://www.myspace.com/73047125
Keith C. -19- http://www.myspace.com/80164512
Viet N. -19- http://www.myspace.com/vietphunguyen
Ugur O. -20- http://www.myspace.com/our17
Phil O. -22- http://www.myspace.com/lebronjr3
Khalid S. -19- http://www.myspace.com/roccity
Anthony H. -19- http://www.myspace.com/applejuicedifset
Louie D'A. -
Nico C. -
Matthew A. -

Girls:
Jennifer O. -20- http://www.myspace.com/nj122104 - http://http://www.myspace.com/x3_jennn
Lindsay Q -
Alanna L.

Here is a list of the facebooks began by BobbieBu:
(as noted by cc81, many of the "friends" have facebooks, most of them are set to private.)

Jenn O: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2019879&id=1013670465
Jennifer Marie: private... JO's other facebook
Allana L: private (24 pics on JO's site)
Lindsay Q: private (1 pic on JO's site)
Ugar: private (18 pic on JO site)
Phil O: private (10 pic on JO site)
Viet N: private (9 pic on JO site)
Anthony H: private (6 pic on JO site)
Nico: private (4 pic on JO site)
Kahlid: private (4 pic on JO site)
Louie DA: private (3 pic on JO site)

*** I included the number of pics of each person that are included in the pictures on JO's "Myrtle 09 *****es" because it could indicate the extent to which they were involved with her and possibly Brittanee at Myrtle Beach. ***

...We can add others...





We can add on others that have been found since then...

Here Zipper, perhaps this will help sort things out. :)
 
  • #703
Just going for a stretch here. People have been talking here about how the surveillence pics dont look like B and there are pics of j.o with the same outfit on as the one B has on in the pics. what if it is was J.O in the pics to throw people off. it is possible that she could have worn a wig. The face is very round to be B and even through distortion of the video, the person appears very heavy.

LOL....if nothing else gets a response from these girls, that implication just might! She seems like the type to be incensed at being described as heavy, especially if it is in comparison to B.
 
  • #704
mOuse...you rock! Thank you so much. :)
 
  • #705
Not a problem. Glad I could help. :)
If you are curious about the picture references, instead of you looking back I can send you the link which you will be able to view if you have a Facebook.
There were other pictures that have since been deleted (or set so it's a private album) which included some pictures of the girls heading home looking not at all concerned and making guns with their hands.
 
  • #706
What about those police reports someone posted on here ...it might've been on the other thread, but it mentioned a van just sitting there with a man who seemed to be drunk and was watching girls in a suspicious manner? If I'm remembering right, that was either the day before or the day that Brittanee went missing. It was also somewhere on Ocean Blvd. If the girls are not involved with the case, this guy in a van has been at the back of my mind. I'm guessing though that if someone called to report a suspicious man lurking behind an alley, that the police would have ran him off or something. Eh.

I hope this doesn't turn into another cold case. :(

I believe this is the story that I posted on that was a hoax.
 
  • #707
This may have been posted already im not sure,im been searching like crazy for any kind of update and i came across a photo album of some pictures of B. Some of them i reconized and some of them i did not. Also there is a few pics of B with drinks in her hand from what appears to be a club, it seems this page is one that Peter has put up along with a girl Amber.

http://www.facebook.com/photo_search.php?oid=87839007342&view=all

There is one pic in there with three girls, this particular one has BD in it. All the girls are wearing black shorts, I am uncertain if one of the three are JO.
 
  • #708
Yeah, I would be happy to have you send me a direct link, as I do have a facebook account. Is it kosher to write my email on this site or is that a no-no. ;)
 
  • #709
Zipper, here's the link. You can scroll through all of the pictures and read the comments.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30375114&id=1013670465#/photo.php?pid=30375113&id=1013670465

I choose to link you that one just to show how it looks as if B isn't apart of the group by being in the background (on her tippy-toes) when everyone else is in the foreground.

Also, once you reach 25 posts you can look at albums and cc81 and Autumndreams have some good ones related to this case. You can go and find easy threads to reach it such as the Alphabet Game, etc
 
  • #710
Maybe I am just over analyzing but I think it is weird that they didn't tag BD in that photo since you can still see her clearly even though she is in the background.

As it has been mentioned before, I believe that BD was the "outsider" of the group (not coming from same socio-economic class) and was probably hated by most her female friends because she is so dang adorable. I sentiments everyone's opinion that the friends need to be looked at under a microscope. I have felt my hinky-meter go way off since the beginning that the friends actions are just plain suspicious...or else they are not very bright. Too many red-flags in this case, imho.

Okay, so I only have 20 more posts to go to view all the pictures? LOL. You will be hearing from me a lot today.
 
  • #711
BTW, excuse me if this has already been mentioned but why does BD's bf JG have his myspace profile listed as "married". Does that seem odd to anyone?
 
  • #712
Maybe I am just over analyzing but I think it is weird that they didn't tag BD in that photo since you can still see her clearly even though she is in the background.

As it has been mentioned before, I believe that BD was the "outsider" of the group (not coming from same socio-economic class) and was probably hated by most her female friends because she is so dang adorable. I sentiments everyone's opinion that the friends need to be looked at under a microscope. I have felt my hinky-meter go way off since the beginning that the friends actions are just plain suspicious...or else they are not very bright. Too many red-flags in this case, imho.

Okay, so I only have 20 more posts to go to view all the pictures? LOL. You will be hearing from me a lot today.


Being an over-addicted to Facebook college student, I can tell you that oftentimes when a person doesn't have a Facebook, they won't get tagged in the picture. It is more work to tag someone who doesn't have a Facebook than it is to tag someone who is on your friends list already. Also, aside from letting you know who's in the pictures, tagging is used so that the photo will appear on whomever's page has been tagged as well.

Say JO did tag BD in her picture. If BD had a Facebook then the picture would, in turn, show up in a special section of BD's profile and it would indicate who the picture originates from.

Many times when I tag my friends in pictures I will skip over the one's who don't have a page because I know it has no page to go to for them.
 
  • #713
BTW, excuse me if this has already been mentioned but why does BD's bf JG have his myspace profile listed as "married". Does that seem odd to anyone?

I hadn't noticed that, I could have sworn it said "in a relationship" the other day. Anyways, kids do it. My Facebook says I'm married, but I'm not. My boyfriend sent me the request and I just accepted it...it's more of a joke, but also lets your friends know you're not casually dating and are in a serious relationship.
 
  • #714
BTW, excuse me if this has already been mentioned but why does BD's bf JG have his myspace profile listed as "married". Does that seem odd to anyone?

This is just a trend and means nothing (at least IMO). I'm 20 and see it all the time on Facebook. People go from being "single" to "married" very often. Also, I've seen girls "married" to their best friends on it as well.
 
  • #715
I believe this is the story that I posted on that was a hoax.

Oh, not the van from the other day with the juveniles playing a prank. Hold on, let me search some posts back and I'll repost it.
 
  • #716
Being an over-addicted to Facebook college student, I can tell you that oftentimes when a person doesn't have a Facebook, they won't get tagged in the picture. It is more work to tag someone who doesn't have a Facebook than it is to tag someone who is on your friends list already. Also, aside from letting you know who's in the pictures, tagging is used so that the photo will appear on whomever's page has been tagged as well.

Say JO did tag BD in her picture. If BD had a Facebook then the picture would, in turn, show up in a special section of BD's profile and it would indicate who the picture originates from.

Many times when I tag my friends in pictures I will skip over the one's who don't have a page because I know it has no page to go to for them.

I know the whole tagging thing because I'm in my 20's and addicted as well but I still tag people in my pictures even if they don't have a FB. Once you tag them once in the album (and only if it's yours and in the same album) when you go to tag again, the people you have recently tagged are listed at the top, followed by the rest of your friends.
I noticed B is tagged in some but not the other. I wonder if JO tagged her or if someone else did...
 
  • #717
Being an over-addicted to Facebook college student, I can tell you that oftentimes when a person doesn't have a Facebook, they won't get tagged in the picture. It is more work to tag someone who doesn't have a Facebook than it is to tag someone who is on your friends list already. Also, aside from letting you know who's in the pictures, tagging is used so that the photo will appear on whomever's page has been tagged as well.

Say JO did tag BD in her picture. If BD had a Facebook then the picture would, in turn, show up in a special section of BD's profile and it would indicate who the picture originates from.

Many times when I tag my friends in pictures I will skip over the one's who don't have a page because I know it has no page to go to for them.

Look at the pics again,she DID take the time to type others in that didn't have FB accounts,all except for B.
 
  • #718
I know the whole tagging thing because I'm in my 20's and addicted as well but I still tag people in my pictures even if they don't have a FB. Once you tag them once in the album (and only if it's yours and in the same album) when you go to tag again, the people you have recently tagged are listed at the top, followed by the rest of your friends.
I noticed B is tagged in some but not the other. I wonder if JO tagged her or if someone else did...


True...someone else might have. Sometimes I just don't tag people if they don't have a Facebook & I've seen my friends skimp on the tagging as well. JO and the crew don't seem like the type to fret over not tagging someone properly.
 
  • #719
There is one pic in there with three girls, this particular one has BD in it. All the girls are wearing black shorts, I am uncertain if one of the three are JO.


If you're talking about the one with Britt in the white shirt (I think you must be), the one on the far right in purple is JO. You can tell in her other pictures that the shorts are denim. It's not too important, but that's where my doubt in which picture you're talking about comes in.
 
  • #720
Also B's name has RECENTLY been added to some of those pics,her name was not there for awhile now and her name isn't tagged,it is typed in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
147
Guests online
2,859
Total visitors
3,006

Forum statistics

Threads
632,133
Messages
18,622,583
Members
243,032
Latest member
beccabelle70
Back
Top