hockeymom4
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
- Messages
- 3,468
- Reaction score
- 7
Has TE or LE commented on her phone activity before or during her date?
It has been discussed, but not officially, so it can't be discussed here, as far as I know.
Has TE or LE commented on her phone activity before or during her date?
I think they dont want that person to get rid of evidence or create an albi. Also they might still be investigating that person. Truthfully I agree with you but I am sure Le has their reasons.
Has TE or LE commented on her phone activity before or during her date?
Re; phone being off...what if someone who she wanted to "walk away from" was repeatedly calling her, or maybe someone close to that person was...maybe she would turn it off to stop that...at least for the time being.
Questions, I hope this allowed. Have they ever said if it was possible for her to have runway, end her life etc or was foul play the only option explored? I don't necessarily think it would change the investigation other than there wouldn't be a poI, but in my area this happens so often. I was late to this case. I hope this isn't out of line.
The mysterious 3:41 communication after she talked to her roommate had to have been an outgoing call (not text) from HE to unnamed entity; otherwise, how would LE even know it happened? They don't have her phone, so they are getting info from her phone records. If unnamed entity called or texted her, it wouldn't show who the text was from, just that a text came in. If she simply texted unnamed entity, unnamed entity could say they were sleeping and didn't get any texts until the next morning. But if it was a phone call from HE for at least 2 minutes, they would know who she called and that there was someone on the other end who she actually talked to.
Which leads to my next thought. She seems like a girl that treated her phone like an appendage. If you look at the stick-shift driving pic, she won't even part with the phone while she's learning to drive, it's right in her lap. After she talks
to unnamed entity and leaves her house, her phone goes dead.
I think they dont want that person to get rid of evidence or create an albi. Also they might still be investigating that person. Truthfully I agree with you but I am sure Le has their reasons.
In the Alexis Murphy case, didn't they use dogs that were specifically trained to sniff out cell phones? Something about being trained for use in prisons/jails to find inmates with cell phones? I would love to hear if the HCPD would reach out to a resource like this and have those dogs search PTL and the surrounding areas.
Yes. What I was trying to say was what if they didn't know for sure at the time who she spoke to because there was no evidence. What if she drove around for an hour talking and pinging? I don't know this, just saying. She could have seen people. All the call history and pinging can help the investigation. The comment won't "admit" among other things, makes me think this. If someone called from a cell or landline, you don't need them to admit anything...IMO. You just bring them in and question them. Where I live, a lot of people have burner phones....not people I know. Maybe it was that or from another untraceable source. It is an odd statement to say the least. Regardless, for all we know they know who they last person to talk to her was now and it didn't matter. If it were my child, I would want the police to have that info released in hopes someone saw her.
[/B]
Thank you for the text/call info. I was wondering how all of that worked. I'm confused about your last sentence. HE's phone didn't go dead after the 3:41 communication. Did I misunderstand what you were trying to say? I've been known to do that.
I've read the last ping was at 3:41 and I've read the last communication was at 3:41. Maybe it's just semantics. Perhaps I should have worded it to say radio silence after 3:41.
This case has an extra layer of difficulty to it because we all have read things that we have to now pretend we haven't read, so it's difficult to phrase things accordingly.
Sometimes I think they don't release info because they don't want people to take things into their own hands.
Which leads me to wonder...if that were the case and it appears things are getting out of hand, whereas someone may take things into their own hands...then what?
Which leads me to wonder...if that were the case and it appears things are getting out of hand, whereas someone may take things into their own hands...then what?
I think that if someone accessed her SM and tried to make it look like she was depressed,they would have made the sure the posts were explicit in their depression and also made sure her body was found and made to look like a suicide.
I felt like posts long before the last night showed some depression, in any event.
What were the last posts? Can they be posted? I cannot see Tumblr from Ipad.