SC - Paul Murdaugh & mom Margaret Found Shot To Death - Alex Murdaugh Accused - Islandton #21

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #201

We’re back after lunch. Defense attorney Dick Harpootlian rises to object to Waters calling his next witness, Tony Satterfield. Harpootlian says the presentation of one of Murdaugh’s financial witnesses is more prejudicial than useful.

Harpootlian says Murdaugh’s thefts have already been documented in evidence, so this is beating a dead horse.

Waters argues Satterfield shows a different kind of theft and is worth including. Waters says he has texts in April 2021 in which Murdaugh assured Satterfield they are working hard on his mother’s case and everything is fine.

Satterfield called Murdaugh on 6/22/21 to ask about his mother's case, two weeks after the slayings, Waters says. Satterfield said in his previous testimony he couldn't remember exactly when he made that call.

Harpootlian makes the case that the Satterfield issue didn't contribute to the alleged motive since the call didn't come before 6/7/21.

Harpootlian: The financial crimes were admitted to prove motive. Nothing here establishes that Alex Murdaugh had reason to murder his wife and son. No “immediacy.” “The only call between these folks began on June 22, two weeks after the murders.”

Harpootlian: “This is a murder trial, not a financial fraud trial.”

Judge Newman: “This testimony is consistent with the state’s theory of the defendant being in a frantic state, seeking to avoid disclosure of these financial crimes and thefts.” He denies Harpootlian's motion to exclude Tony Satterfield's testimony.

Harpootlian argues one last time that Satterfield's call to Murdaugh didn't come until two weeks after the slayings, so it couldn't have contributed to Murdaugh's concern he was about to be exposed.

Newman says he understands. But this is a huge theft and Murdaugh could have been worried about its exposure.

Satterfield testifies about how Murdaugh spoke with him after his mother's funeral and told him he would bring a legal claim against his own insurance providers for Satterfield and his brother's benefit.

Satterfield then explains how Murdaugh essentially handled the case, even though he was the defendant.

Prosecutor Waters has Tony Satterfield read a text conversation he had with Murdaugh on April 12, 2021. Murdaugh texted Tony to check in, saying he was working a case that reminded him of Tony. Tony responded he was doing well. He asked about his mother's case.

Murdaugh to Tony: “Finally getting some movement. Still a ways to go. Doing good. Was just thinking about and thought I’d check in. ... See you soon.” By then, Gloria's case had produced two settlements worth $4.3M. Murdaugh stole $3.4M of it. Tony to Murdaugh: “Cool. Thanks.”

Satterfield testifies that Murdaugh told him his goal was to recover $100,000 for each of Satterfield’s two sons from the insurance case. But then Murdaugh never told him when the case settled for $4.3M. Waters: “At any time, did he ever pay you one penny?” Satterfield: “No.”

Waters finishes his questioning of Tony Satterfield: Why did you agree to Murdaugh’s plan to sue himself? Satterfield: “Because I trusted him.”





Harpootlian on cross-examination asks Satterfield if he ever called lawyer Cory Fleming or banker Chad Westendorf to ask about his case. Satterfield says no.

Harpootlian notes that the Satterfields hired attorneys Eric Bland and Ronnie Richter and got $6.5 million from their case against Murdaugh and other defendants. Harpootlian: “So you have been made more than whole for that loss?” Satterfield: “Yes.”

Harpootlian also establishes that Satterfield never confronted Murdaugh about any stolen money before 6/7/21, the date of the murders.

The state's 42nd witness is Jan Malinowski, CEO of Palmetto State Bank. He testified earlier in this case with the jury excused about Murdaugh's massive debts and overdrafts. He said the bank would have cut Murdaugh off if it found out earlier that he was stealing from clients.
 
  • #202
Tinsley is not the prosecuting attorney AM's case, so I don't see an issue with his donation, imo.
It's still an issue. Has the wrongful death suit been resolved? How would a "guilty" verdict in a murder case impact the jury hearing in that civil suit? How much would Tinsley earn should the wrongful death case have a positive ruling for his client?

Tinsley was foolish to make the donation (ETA: If in fact he did) - he potentially endangered this case and his own.
 
  • #203
And Mark Tinsley was the one supposedly who gave $1000 to the Go Fund Me. MOO.

ETA: The defense stated they had a screenshot showing where Mark Tinsley's name was listed as the $1000 donor, but that it was then changed to Anonymous.
Does anyone think BM could have made that donation? Perhaps shooting the flying financial finger of fate?
 
  • #204
The defense just made an 🤬🤬🤬 out of themselves, not for making it known but for getting up and presenting it as mad as he was - red faced and no legal backing. WTH - morons. This judge is level headed and likes organization, why can’t they get that?
 
  • #205
I really don’t think the Defense can make any points with these ‘character witnesses.’

We have seen a parade of people who trusted AM as a long-time employer…or who truly loved him as a friend and cared for his family…or who held him as a community leader in the highest esteem.

Every single one of them…he betrayed in some way. He lied to them, stole from them, NONE of their devotion to HIM was returned in kind. We are seeing and feeling their emotions toward HIM but in return, what did each of them get FROM him?

Betrayal after betrayal! Sure they can say that they thought he was a devoted family man…but they also thought he was a devoted friend, an honest boss, a highly reputable lawyer.

He was never any of those things!

When i think of the Murdaugh family, I will remember Paul slapping his girlfriend on the boat. MM and RM III sweeping callously past a devastated family denied their privilege to cross the police tape; AM‘s treatment of the Satterfield brothers while he indulged his own family with their money; Buster’s behavior in court.

I will leave that without further comment.
 
  • #206
So…..how will defense cover up AM being on the recording at the kennels? Remember he said he didn’t go there.
In the Defense's Opening Statement the defense admitted that it was Alex in that recording at the kennels. At 17:50 here. At another point in the opening DH seemed to argue that Alex may not have disclosed everything to LE because he was traumatized, unnerved by the questioning, and thought that LE had already made up their minds that he did it the night of murders. JMO.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #207
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #208
I'm about to the point that I don't like any of these people, even those on the side of the prosecution. I can't think of any case where I've felt like this.
 
  • #209
It's still an issue. Has the wrongful death suit been resolved? How would a "guilty" verdict in a murder case impact the jury hearing in that civil suit? How much would Tinsley earn should the wrongful death case have a positive ruling for his client?

Tinsley was foolish to make the donation (ETA: If in fact he did) - he potentially endangered this case and his own.
The judge didn't seem to think it was an issue since he refused to strike Tinsley's testimony.
 
  • #210
Such a classy family…

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #211
After Barber was denied the striking of Tinsley’s testimony, he asked the Judge to not allow Tinsley to testify about the focus group he held and the Judge said he wasn’t going to pre-screen testimony.
And then he told Barber this :

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #212
The judge didn't seem to think it was an issue since he refused to strike Tinsley's testimony.
I think the judge thought it was an issue that would be addressed by presenting it before a jury (with cross examination and objections presented as reasonable) and allowing them to exercise their judgment about it.
 
  • #213
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #214
They will have to prove to me Tinsley made that donation. It’s not that hard to make a donation using a false name. He’s too smart to be that stupid.
 
  • #215
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #216
Grab your popcorn...it will be Tinsley vs. Barber round 2 on cross!
 
  • #217
They will have to prove to me Tinsley made that donation. It’s not that hard to make a donation using a false name. He’s too smart to be that stupid.

I thought I read that the prosecution acknowledged it was him.
 
  • #218
I was afraid that this kind of mindset was present.

Apparently something was passed from the family to Alex. Judge moved the family back in the courtroom and told them the next seat was out the door. Buster was admonished for flipping the bird at Tinsley

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
You know if this kind of thing is going on, it makes me think a certain family is totally supporting and enabling A, in fact they may even think he is guilty of the murders but their blood is so thick they are sticking by him. As close as they have all seemed through the years, they might even be relieved two people who had the potential to bring shame (divorce, financial ruin, public trial, etc.) on their family are out of the picture. Could A be a hero? What a family :eek:

MOO. MOO. MOO.

Edit: some predictive spelling corrections.
 
Last edited:
  • #219

The state's 42nd witness is Jan Malinowski, CEO of Palmetto State Bank. He testified earlier in this case with the jury excused about Murdaugh's massive debts and overdrafts. He said the bank would have cut Murdaugh off if it found out earlier that he was stealing from clients.

It should be noted that at least one executive at the bank allegedly knew Murdaugh was stealing, and he is now headed to federal prison (pending appeal).

The lengthy explainer on the Shelley Smith GoFundMe page has been deleted and replaced with a two-line description. It has now raised more than $7,600.

Prosecutor Creighton Waters seems to acknowledge this testimony is putting everyone to sleep, says he is finally getting to "the beginning of the end" with Malinowski.

If this were a baseball game, this would be the perfect time for the seventh-inning stretch.

Under questioning from Waters, Malinoski testifies (again) that Palmetto State Bank would have stopped lending to Murdaugh if it had learned he was stealing client funds, had been fired from his law firm or had been disbarred.

Judge Newman has called for a brief break.

I went over to the food trucks and bought a funnel cake. Gotta try to turn this day around somehow.

Oh boy. Defense attorney Phillip Barber is bringing up the Shelley Smith GoFundMe page.

"The very first donation" made to the page was $1,000 from Mark Tinsley, Barber says. Tinsley later removed his name. But Tinsley has admitted he donated the money to a witness who is still under subpoena. The defense is now moving to exclude Tinsley's testimony. Wow.

Barber says he cannot find a single case in which one witness called by prosecutors is making monetary payments for testimony by another witness at trial.

"He made a financial payment to a witness in the middle of a trial" ... "as a reward for her honesty." "That'll be good fodder for cross-examination," Newman says, refusing to strike Tinsley's testimony. So now we get Barber vs. Tinsley 2.0 with a little more juice.

The jury is back in. Jim Griffin is up to cross-examine Malinowski. I wouldn't mind fast-forwarding this bit to get to Barber v. Tinsley asap, if I'm honest.

Days since the Murdaugh trial was unnecessarily dramatic: 0

Griffin establishes that at the time of the slayings, Alex Murdaugh could have walked into Palmetto State Bank and gotten a loan. He was not under any kind of scrutiny with them. Malinowski agrees.

Waters: “When all of this crashed and burned, was the bank left holding the bag for all of these uncollected loans?” Malinowski: “Yes, sir.” W: “Including the $750,000?” M: “Yes, sir.”

Mercifully, Jan Malinowski's time on the witness stand is up. Now it's Mark Tinsley's turn. He's the state's 43rd witness.
 
  • #220
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
93
Guests online
2,061
Total visitors
2,154

Forum statistics

Threads
632,811
Messages
18,632,012
Members
243,304
Latest member
Fractured Truths
Back
Top