- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 45,187
- Reaction score
- 463,684
Holy buckets -- not that MM's heartbreak was funny but you have to love she never let AM forget what allegedly happened in 2007.
No doubt AM sure made MM pay for (constantly) bringing it up.

Holy buckets -- not that MM's heartbreak was funny but you have to love she never let AM forget what allegedly happened in 2007.
MOO AM brought Eddie into the picture to claim he killed MM and PM and now was going to AM. I think he was going to kill Eddie. Eddie caught on and wrestled the gun from him, in the scuffle it grazed Am's head.Did he instruct his cousin to safely shoot him in his head? Maybe he wanted to kill himself and didn't have the balls to do it himself. I mean, getting shot at doesn't really leave much room for error.
She only had $57 bucks to her name!? I hadn't heard thatIMO, AM had zero patience or the propensity to save -- offshore or otherwise!! MM had $57 to her name at death and their joint account wasn't exactly flush with cash either.
That's one big nutshell hanging over PM's head and agree, domino effect.Look at who we are dealing with? His life is one big lie and not only a big lie, but he was able to con those he was stealing from and lying to. I'd say trying to pin down one motive is difficult with a person like this. He is a manipulator and that is clear from how he tries to suggest things to witnesses and in my opinion the state doesn't need to point to a specific motive, but all these "motives" are indicative of his state of mind at this time, the state of his marriage, his emotional state (dad dying, moms illness, son has a case hanging over his head, he's just been confronted about stealing, wife might be looking into finances when she has been far removed from the financials up to this point, etc) it was the perfect storm that lead to him commiting these murders. I don't think they are trying to throw it all at the wall, they are putting a puzzle together to show all these pieces of Alex and the picture is coming in clearly!
Exactly.Look at who we are dealing with? His life is one big lie and not only a big lie, but he was able to con those he was stealing from and lying to. I'd say trying to pin down one motive is difficult with a person like this. He is a manipulator and that is clear from how he tries to suggest things to witnesses and in my opinion the state doesn't need to point to a specific motive, but all these "motives" are indicative of his state of mind at this time, the state of his marriage, his emotional state (dad dying, moms illness, son has a case hanging over his head, he's just been confronted about stealing, wife might be looking into finances when she has been far removed from the financials up to this point, etc) it was the perfect storm that lead to him commiting these murders. I don't think they are trying to throw it all at the wall, they are putting a puzzle together to show all these pieces of Alex and the picture is coming in clearly!
Perhaps to show AM's character.I don’t see how an affair that happened 15 years back pertains to the murders, especially since they have stayed together since.
The defenses smoke and mirrors have backfired on em lol.The Defense is all over the place.... regarding the alleged affair, "it didn't happen", "it happened 15 years ago".![]()
Can’t help but wonder whose side Griffin is on. I think he would like to see AM found guilty.Maybe Mr. defense attorney should have just declined to question Maggie's sister.. they wouldn't be in this pickle right now. Can't have it both ways sir.
So it wasn't a "lovey dovey" marriage?I don’t see how an affair that happened 15 years back pertains to the murders, especially since they have stayed together since.
Welcome to the Big Top we been riding this crazy train for awhile with our popcorn and balloons flying all over the place.So.Much.DRAMA!!!! Goodness gracious.
And to leave jurors wondering if AM already had picked out MM’s replacement.Perhaps to show AM's character.
Prosecution has never skated on thin ice.You can't allow this stuff in. First of all, the prosecution is skating on thin ice with all the financial stuff. An appeal is 50/50 just with that. But the defense never asked about September and didn't open any doors imo.
As far as the affair thing, that is just a smear campaign from the prosecution. It happened 15 years ago and it isn't even stated in fact on what happened. What's next? Are you going to admit the time he stepped in dog crap 20 years ago?
You can't allow this stuff in. First of all, the prosecution is skating on thin ice with all the financial stuff. An appeal is 50/50 just with that. But the defense never asked about September and didn't open any doors imo.
As far as the affair thing, that is just a smear campaign from the prosecution. It happened 15 years ago and it isn't even stated in fact on what happened. What's next? Are you going to admit the time he stepped in dog crap 20 years ago?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.