- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 12,605
- Reaction score
- 165,673
Very possible12.39 ET - expert testifying:
This seems a no-brainer. seems Alec turned around after the fatal shots and just took a couple shots back out of anger or to add confusion with evidence.
what ya think?
Just by looking at these photos of the shed and dog house area.... it looks like a dump.
From all this, I'm guessing they're trying to confuse the jurors regarding the state's evidence.I don't think they are being very specific about that, on purpose? IDK how this guy can't testify to flight path of bullets when he doesn't use the info of the wounds and the body's position while being shot
Moselle.Where are they suggesting the shooter was at the start of the shootings?
Avery Wilkes is tweeting these went thru their bodiesPaul was shot while in the shed, opposite direction of the quail pen and dog house.
Maggie's body was found near the dog house. We know the shooter was moving as he shot her 5 times. If he missed a couple of times, it doesn't really make any difference.
I certainly felt bad for the working dogs existence being in jail most of the timeSeeing these pens they had for the dogs and quail... how sad and disgusting. Those tiny cramped nasty pens. I hope they no longer have any animals. Says a lot about that family.
Interesting and a thought, I am pretty sure others might have alluded to earlier. Shooter possibly tripped or fell, from recoil? Being startled? Maybe a brief struggle and then fell, and had to shoot from down low? MOO. And I do not have complete knowledge or command of what has been introduced for evidence.
Not if it went through a body first. This witness's testimony, with his trigonometry, does not address this. And if you don't have THE gun you can't say with great accuracy how the shell casings will fly