- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 10,868
- Reaction score
- 90,211
Yeah and he made a big sigh of relief tooNo more tears
Yeah and he made a big sigh of relief tooNo more tears
…before he finally settled on “the shooter.” Ha! Even this witness thinks AM did it.Ha! And then he corrected it to “ the accused “
Yes she was! I bet after these two witnesses and the evaluation from defense as just ehh, DH will suggest or retract his suggestion or request to go to Moselle.Goude is good!
JMO
Yes. And in a recent released jail telephone call with the remaining son, I believe the defendant, when surprised his son did not want to go hunting for deer or dove? on the property - indicated he would let I am pretty sure defense attorney Griffin go if the son chose not to do so, MO & recollectionGood questions. JG probably took them out there and they met JMM who happens to be taking care of the place that I thought had been sold. I think JG is more familiar with Moselle than DH. JG seems more of a hunter. The way DH was handling that gun earlier in this trial leads me to believe he's not a hunter and would probably only manage to accidentally shoot down a Chinese balloon. moo
Casey Anthony trial for killing her daughter Caylee.
Timothy Palmbach is on the stand now. He says he's here on retainer, being paid by the defense. Palmbach is a crime scene analyst specializing in blood spatter.
Palmbach testifies upon reading the information about Paul, his interpretation is that the gunshot wound to the head was a contact wound. He says before coming to Walterboro (he's from Connecticut), he had never talked to Eisenstat - meaning his conclusions were drawn separately.
Palmbach says he agrees with previous testimony that Paul had no defense wounds, meaning he didn't put his hands up to block the shot. Palmbach testifies he thinks Paul was surprised by the shot.
Palmbach testifies there would have been blood and other tissue matter sprayed on the shooter, matted in the hair, on the clothes, etc.
Palmbach testifies that he believes Maggie was moving while she was being shot, although she was facing the shooter at all times based on the wounds she sustained. He says based on the location of the shell casings, he thinks the shooter also moved around some.
Palmbach says his "opinion is the totality of the evidence" indicates that there were two shooters on June 7, 2021. He says Paul's shooter would've gotten covered with bone, blood, and brain matter, which would've temporarily rendered them unavailable to run and shoot Maggie.
Love Dr Kinsey -- bring it on and show them how it's done!
Probably laughing in his head at how well he carried out the murders that all the experts are analyzing what happened and none of them agree and he knows.. he can see it so he's probably comparing what he knows to what they are saying. Yep good one and nope all wrong there. ughHe looks like he's reliving the evening and almost talking to himself. Weird.
AM's 401K.Who’s paying for Alex’s defense?
Ms. Goude was better than I anticipated … credit to her!Goude is good!
JMO
Yup funny how everyone's chillin including the dogs, would be chillin too since I knew who's around me, until the shooting starts.Palmbach said Paul was taken by surprise when he was shot, which pretty much disproves the theory that it was some outside strangers that did it, because that means the dogs were not alerting and the neither were the guineas. It was someone the dogs know very well. I wonder who???
Yeah that call turned my stomach. How would he ever think his surviving son would want to go hunt on that property where his Mom and brother were hunted and slaughtered!? The man has no empathy, IMOYes. And in a recent released jail telephone call with the remaining son, I believe the defendant, when surprised his son did not want to go hunting for deer or dove? on the property - indicated he would let I am pretty sure defense attorney Griffin go if the son chose not to do so, MO & recollection
Who’s paying for Alex’s defense?
But then didn’t he say she would not have been moved? So when Alex said he “checked them,” how could that be true? How did he “check her” when her arms were underneath her and she had not been moved?… the defendant could have moved her?? Oops!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.