Stella5
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2008
- Messages
- 2,104
- Reaction score
- -19
It would be quite a giveaway for there not to be prints in the wet grass. Also if the prints went outside for a little ways and turned around to come back in the house.
This was a huge clue in a very old case. It snowed and there was a set of prints walking out of the house to the spot where the shooter stood...then went back into the house. They still could not get a conviction! (This was back in the late 60s, I think.)

Now I'm really wondering about the footprints... were they there, were they not??? Too many what ifs & unknowns!!
O/T delayed sentencing in the Megan Meier case :furious: