For clarity, reading the entire article, of the 70,000 Afgan people brought into the country after Taliban took control again, 7,000 were found to have potential security concerns, or 10% (the article does not say when this was discovered). "While various US agencies were able to resolve many of the red flags, as of September there were still 885 people with potentially negative national security information." This represents a little over 1% of the original 70,000. The vast majority of Afghan people who were brought here are living there lives without incident.
There is a great deal of political, partisan rhetoric surrounding this issue. This is clear in this article, from the BBC, which attempted a deep dive into this issue of how Afghan nationals were vetted and what the process was for bringing them over.
BBC Verify looks into claims that the Afghan national suspected of shooting two National Guard members in Washington DC entered the US unvetted.
www.bbc.com
"Jennie Murray, President and CEO of the immigration advocacy group the National Immigration Forum, told BBC Verify she was present at the US military bases where evacuees were initially processed.
"Evacuees were processed on military bases and held for several weeks, and even months, until they were ready for entrance into the United States. This is when the security vetting and medical screening was processed, extensively", she said.
"Even the best vetting can't predict the future. He [Lakanwal] could have had a clean record, been an appropriate candidate for humanitarian protection, and then something changed."