Hi MeeBee, have they said how many jurors they now have? I keep hearing how many they have dropped, but never how many they have. I didn't think the had the all. Tia~ :seeya:
Sure Nore! Troy Hayden says there are 176 left now to choose from! :seeya:
Hi MeeBee, have they said how many jurors they now have? I keep hearing how many they have dropped, but never how many they have. I didn't think the had the all. Tia~ :seeya:
Couple things:
I don't think you're correct that Jodi can introduce these emails into her mitigation, without resistance. This is a mitigation phase, yes, but it's basically a trial. You can't just admit letters and emails, willy nilly. There has to be some grounds for it. And Juan can still call Chris Hughes to explain them away, which he would, no doubt. However, this email is old news.
And yes, you are missing quite a bit about Michael Kiefer. It's not about just getting a scoop. I don't really want to get into all of it, but there is a reason I choose to ignore what he posts/writes.
He has said many unsavory things to our KCL about Travis and his family in support of Arias. The thing that stands out most to me, from memory: "they're just upset (his siblings) because they had to find out what a pig their brother is."
He did a huge piece on Juan Martinez and the prosecutor's office and how corrupt they are. He seems to have a strong hatred of Juan and it shows in the articles he writes. He has said unsavory things about him to our KCL, as well.
He puts a pro defense spin on everything he writes. This is not imagined. It's been reported that he's not very respected among his peers because of this. Seems to have access to things, like this email, that no one else does. He is not printing it to be a good reporter. He is trying to spin opinion in Jodi's favor. Notice how he never leaks anything that favors the state? He also has leaked things like motions, who the foreman was before anyone knew, etc. this is not imagined either. Juan hinted in a motion earlier this year that he is aware of the DT running to this reporter to report what they want to get out there, but having things they don't want out under seal. He also insinuated some of the stuff is stuff that it was wrong to let out. When I myself asked him to maybe report things with less of a slant he told me he's "just reporting the truth" and blocked me on twitter.
And then there is the flat out lie he told about the defense having to walk out the side door everyday because of threats while Juan walks out the front door everyday so he can sign autographs everyday. KCL tells this one much better than me but that's the gist. None of that is true. The DT strutted by the media trucks every single day, smiling for the cameras, as evidenced by the many pictures of them doing so. While Juan walked out the side door everyday and off to his office, save for the one day when a news station was doing a story on him and autograph-gate happened.
I could go on but you get the point. There IS a reason why some posters, myself included, object to his tweets being posted here among the others and why some of us choose to scroll and roll. The things he has said about Travis is what most makes me not want to ever read anything he writes. You can of course continue to post his tweets if you still think some would appreciate reading them. I will continue to TRY to ignore them. But now you know the story there.
I think those "hearsay" emails may be brought in for missy's:jail: mitigation:
On pg 6 of the new motion:
Mentions that Det. Flores:
"told this court that he didn't find anything out of the ordinary in Mr. Alexander's G-mail account ... Despite being characterized as ordinary by Det. Flores, it is of importance to note the relevant and excalupatory content found in Mr. alexander's G-mail account:
1. A January 27, 2007 email sent from Mr. Alexander to Chris and Sky Hughes complaining about their decision to tell Ms. Arias that he is abusive towards women.
2. Mrs Hughes' response that she sent to Mr. Alexander the same day, wherein she points out that Mr. Alexander refers to Jodi as "" and that he kepts his relationship with her a secret.
3. A response from Mr. Hughes sent on January 31, 2007 wherein he asserts that he believed Jodi would be his [Travis'] next victim and that Jodi was just another girl that he [Travis] was playing.
4. Mr. Alexander's response to Mr. Hughes that he sent on January 31, 2007, wherin he admits that with certain people "I am a bit of a sociopath."
5. An e-mail sent from Ms. Hughes to Mr. Alexander on this same topic wherein she describes Travis using Jodi as a "booty call". How he, Mr. Alexander, was abusive to Jodi and "not nice to girls", how he was beating her emotionally in part by making out without giving her a commitment. in this email Ms. Hughes further chastises Mr. Alexander for only giving Jodi 3am phone calls and make out fests...."
http://media2.abc15.com/html/pdf/JodiAriasMotionOct1.pdf
-------
This retrial will be all about mitigation (or should be).
Missy, in her new mitigation (see items 5 and 6 on page 4), is stating that she was "emotionally" abused by Travis, "emotional stress" :blah::blah::blah: .
Even tho' these e-mails were deemed "hearsay", I'm thinking she can state the emails as proof of said abuse and Jm cannot object to anything she says in her mitigation or that's how I understand
it. Those e-mails will be out there for the jurors to hear, even if JM says they are "hearsay". I hope I'm wrong.
If this is so, these are damning statements that were made by Chris and Sky Hughes in their e-mails for the new jurors to hear, no matter what they said after, IMO.
I'm a little bit worried. There could be jurors, just like the foreman who accepted ALV's assessment as proof of emotional abuse, now accepting these e-mails as proof of emotional abuse.
(Is this trial over yet- it's very stressful. :scared
I don't think that Kiefer is anyone's favorite reporter- not even Nurmi/Wilmott's.
He's just like any reporter who wants "the big scoop", the first to release "the big bombshell tonight" moment under his belt.
If Beth Karas had released this, no one would say anything, IMO- or would they then dislike her?? Anyway, why so much detain for Kiefer? I just don't understand the animosity towards him.:dunno:
Is there something I'm missing here?![]()
Thanks for the info. :seeya:
I do seem to recall posting an article by Kiefer on JM that wasn't very nice. I'm forgetting a lot of things- you must forgive me when I do. :blowkiss:
![]()
![]()
Couple things:
I don't think you're correct that Jodi can introduce these emails into her mitigation, without resistance. This is a mitigation phase, yes, but it's basically a trial. You can't just admit letters and emails, willy nilly. There has to be some grounds for it. And Juan can still call Chris Hughes to explain them away, which he would, no doubt. However, this email is old news.
And yes, you are missing quite a bit about Michael Kiefer. It's not about just getting a scoop. I don't really want to get into all of it, but there is a reason I choose to ignore what he posts/writes.
He has said many unsavory things to our KCL about Travis and his family in support of Arias. The thing that stands out most to me, from memory: "they're just upset (his siblings) because they had to find out what a pig their brother is."
He did a huge piece on Juan Martinez and the prosecutor's office and how corrupt they are. He seems to have a strong hatred of Juan and it shows in the articles he writes. He has said unsavory things about him to our KCL, as well.
He puts a pro defense spin on everything he writes. This is not imagined. It's been reported that he's not very respected among his peers because of this. Seems to have access to things, like this email, that no one else does. He is not printing it to be a good reporter. He is trying to spin opinion in Jodi's favor. Notice how he never leaks anything that favors the state? He also has leaked things like motions, who the foreman was before anyone knew, etc. this is not imagined either. Juan hinted in a motion earlier this year that he is aware of the DT running to this reporter to report what they want to get out there, but having things they don't want out under seal. He also insinuated some of the stuff is stuff that it was wrong to let out. When I myself asked him to maybe report things with less of a slant he told me he's "just reporting the truth" and blocked me on twitter.
And then there is the flat out lie he told about the defense having to walk out the side door everyday because of threats while Juan walks out the front door everyday so he can sign autographs everyday. KCL tells this one much better than me but that's the gist. None of that is true. The DT strutted by the media trucks every single day, smiling for the cameras, as evidenced by the many pictures of them doing so. While Juan walked out the side door everyday and off to his office, save for the one day when a news station was doing a story on him and autograph-gate happened.
I could go on but you get the point. There IS a reason why some posters, myself included, object to his tweets being posted here among the others and why some of us choose to scroll and roll. The things he has said about Travis is what most makes me not want to ever read anything he writes. You can of course continue to post his tweets if you still think some would appreciate reading them. I will continue to TRY to ignore them. But now you know the story there.
MeeBee, weren't you in Poland during the original trial?
Y or N, my opinion of MK isn't any reflection at all on you and your posts. He brings out the worst in me, as does the defense team. And truly, I am getting so old now that my memory is failing too often. I likely remember him because of the truly bad things he said to the Alexander family. You just don't do that the the relatives of a victim.
Total Lunar Eclipse Next Week Will Turn the Moon Blood Red
"The "blood moon" total lunar eclipse will rise during the full moon of Oct. 8 just before sunrise in North America, but red might not be the only color people see during the total eclipse. Weather permitting, it's possible that some sharp-eyed observers might be able to see some blue in the moon's glow. The event will be the second of four consecutive total lunar eclipses in 2014 and 2015, according to NASA officials...."
http://www.space.com/27332-total-lunar-eclipse-october-video.html
Eclipse visibility Map:
![]()
![]()
Oh dear me. I just saw the "sex photos" of Jodi Arias in the trial. My poor poor eyes. Does anyone have some bleach!