Wrinkles
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2005
- Messages
- 2,037
- Reaction score
- 10
Greetings S_Finch,
Evening to you and what a lovely notice to have you write:
>>OK Wrinkles, I see your hand is up, what would you like to share today? <<
I really love it when WS'rs recognize other WS'rs, i.e. when there is an atmosphere of "discuss and brainstorm," "meet and greet," and "give recognition when someone really tosses a great one out there!" (I've seen some really brilliant posts in this place!) On top of that I think it is just beautifully powerful when we "touch" those meeting in this big room -- for whatever reason (like seeing my hand up
So thank you for doing that
I've not had the pleasure to really bump shoulders with you much through the years -- I will look forward to that 
I was responding to dear Kimster saying this...
>>back to the topic at hand - why is th a potential focus in this investigation? What have you observed from the information released in the media? What have you observed in the pictures?<<
First I will admit that I am walking a bit on eggshells, as when I think of TOS, I often cannot see how I might be slipping out of line and don't want to do that...but am also sometimes a bit of a wee rebel (as in "huh what, why can't we discuss that? Fact is, sometimes I just don't rationally understand so it doesn't stick with me.)
So...why would the step mother be a potential focus:
1. we know stats on missing persons, often (large %) someone related
2. just the name "step" comes into play (though I loved my step father beyond words, he was my hero in life)
3. we have now had word of something that has puzzled me for days... Why were we told Kyron had been seen at 9 (after SM at 8:45) but no identity of that 9AM person was given... Now we are hearing SM was the last to see him "alive?" How odd is that.
Long ago I posed the question... Why protect the identity of someone that supposedly saw Kyron after SM left (at 9AM)? Is that person now thought to be at risk OR was that "so-called viewing at 9AM" a bait to try to get a possible SM perp (we DO NOT have word of this THERE IS NO POI) to try and relax and stumble herself.
I "cannot" move one way or another with SM. I must say that my heart does NOT want her responsible in this. I don't have enough "fact" to sway, yet I cannot forget overall fact in cases AND some other things... Were there conflicts in what she said on "day missing?" Were there pings at Sauvie Island? I don't have enough fact to really move against her BUT AND BUT...
Of course there is NO SCRIPT for how we act in tragedy... I can guarantee that I have had my share and if I had been under a microscope people could have eaten me up. I do not like seeing people beaten to shreds in here, like because they are "in the picture" they deserve what I consider to have seen as a type of low class chicken pecking order feed (yes, I had chickens and studied their behaviors!) All I can say is that I have been "observing" and my "often wrong" antennae have gone up...
So I will move to:
>>What have you observed in the pictures?<<
I am not feeling secure with body language with SM... I wish I couldn't say that, and I could surely be wrong, but I am discomforted (thank God I am not in a position of innocence and being scrutinized for my actions -- I don't know who is or is not innocent or guilty here yet, not enough real info but oh man are the lights blinking all over like a confusing light show.)
I have been "uncomfortable" with certain things since the early days...and I have ABSOLUTELY been wrong in life on many occasions. In the early discussions of this case, I could not understand SM's "public" FB punctuations with "
" Of course, I have to go by my own experience. On day one of a step child (beloved) or a step child (maybe under my skin and problematic) missing, I "might have" been able to halfway muster a "
" if I thought about the child's explorations or independence AND if I felt quite comfortable that they would soon be found. On day 2 or 3, I do not think that there could have been a thing in the world that could have gotten me to post a "
" There is no way that I could do anything even somewhat normal, like commenting on "poking" in FB being "addicting." I could not consider "clean sheets" which were mentioned (publicly mods, PUBLICLY). All would have become pure vanity to me aside from being torn to shreds by the possibility of a little 7 year old who had been in my keep not being in my loving arms... I might have done stupid things to entertain and recreate, like playing Pac Man or some other assonine game in the privacy of my home, but I could NOT imagine a "
" anywhere in public, not even as a "brave face" or even a "faithful face." Pure fear, torture for my child, my keep would have ripped me to shreds.
I think I have hit on the above cylinders (potential focus, released in media, pictures)... there is more (confused, as I look at all of this but NOT with enough info, gut is NOT enough)...but this has been LONG which my buddies in here no me for
<--- yes that is a smile about my knowing my long winded self, but there is NOTHING in me smiling about my darling Kyron, our darling Kyron, son of the family of man, missing, and one of "our precious children."
Nuff said
Evening to you and what a lovely notice to have you write:
>>OK Wrinkles, I see your hand is up, what would you like to share today? <<
I really love it when WS'rs recognize other WS'rs, i.e. when there is an atmosphere of "discuss and brainstorm," "meet and greet," and "give recognition when someone really tosses a great one out there!" (I've seen some really brilliant posts in this place!) On top of that I think it is just beautifully powerful when we "touch" those meeting in this big room -- for whatever reason (like seeing my hand up



I was responding to dear Kimster saying this...
>>back to the topic at hand - why is th a potential focus in this investigation? What have you observed from the information released in the media? What have you observed in the pictures?<<
First I will admit that I am walking a bit on eggshells, as when I think of TOS, I often cannot see how I might be slipping out of line and don't want to do that...but am also sometimes a bit of a wee rebel (as in "huh what, why can't we discuss that? Fact is, sometimes I just don't rationally understand so it doesn't stick with me.)
So...why would the step mother be a potential focus:
1. we know stats on missing persons, often (large %) someone related
2. just the name "step" comes into play (though I loved my step father beyond words, he was my hero in life)
3. we have now had word of something that has puzzled me for days... Why were we told Kyron had been seen at 9 (after SM at 8:45) but no identity of that 9AM person was given... Now we are hearing SM was the last to see him "alive?" How odd is that.
Long ago I posed the question... Why protect the identity of someone that supposedly saw Kyron after SM left (at 9AM)? Is that person now thought to be at risk OR was that "so-called viewing at 9AM" a bait to try to get a possible SM perp (we DO NOT have word of this THERE IS NO POI) to try and relax and stumble herself.
I "cannot" move one way or another with SM. I must say that my heart does NOT want her responsible in this. I don't have enough "fact" to sway, yet I cannot forget overall fact in cases AND some other things... Were there conflicts in what she said on "day missing?" Were there pings at Sauvie Island? I don't have enough fact to really move against her BUT AND BUT...
Of course there is NO SCRIPT for how we act in tragedy... I can guarantee that I have had my share and if I had been under a microscope people could have eaten me up. I do not like seeing people beaten to shreds in here, like because they are "in the picture" they deserve what I consider to have seen as a type of low class chicken pecking order feed (yes, I had chickens and studied their behaviors!) All I can say is that I have been "observing" and my "often wrong" antennae have gone up...
So I will move to:
>>What have you observed in the pictures?<<
I am not feeling secure with body language with SM... I wish I couldn't say that, and I could surely be wrong, but I am discomforted (thank God I am not in a position of innocence and being scrutinized for my actions -- I don't know who is or is not innocent or guilty here yet, not enough real info but oh man are the lights blinking all over like a confusing light show.)
I have been "uncomfortable" with certain things since the early days...and I have ABSOLUTELY been wrong in life on many occasions. In the early discussions of this case, I could not understand SM's "public" FB punctuations with "




I think I have hit on the above cylinders (potential focus, released in media, pictures)... there is more (confused, as I look at all of this but NOT with enough info, gut is NOT enough)...but this has been LONG which my buddies in here no me for




Nuff said