Sniff tests, hair decomp, really so conclusive? Fence sitters thread

[Tate]

Not necessarily. Could be someone that phoned in a tip.

"Feeling the urgency in CA's voice to 911 and the urgency in her voice when she called me (she being Cindy) about the tip, I cannot forget."

Is anyone else reading Ladybugz60 post the way I am? Why is Cindy calling Ladybugz60? Are you/is she a friend or family member, or just a devoted follower?

 

[DAWN TREADER]

You are so right about the surreal feel of this case. Just because there are so many unanswered questions.

In response to the waiting 30 days to report it, acting detached and unconcerned, not seeming to realize she's gone, only stating and restating that she left Caylee with this nanny.....one person posted, I think it was here, that they believe that Casey was traumatized somehow, either that Casey discovered Caylee after a tragic accident, or that Caylee was taken from her, whatever the case, that something happened which left Casey traumatized and in shock, to the point that she won't let herself remember anything except that she dropped Caylee off at the sitter on a normal day (all the way back when she used to work at Universal). Interesting theory.

What's surreal is how this case has unfolded revealing a web of deception that truly boggles the mind yet shouldn't because tragically, it is a common denominator or "marker" in so many other cases.

 

[JBean]

"Feeling the urgency in CA's voice to 911 and the urgency in her voice when she called me (she being Cindy) about the tip, I cannot forget."

Is anyone else reading Ladybugz60 post the way I am? Why is Cindy calling Ladybugz60? Are you/is she a friend or family member, or just a devoted follower?

I was just guessing that the poster called in a tip, left a message and Cindy called her back. I have no idea just my impression.

Also, it is against TOS to try and reveal someone's identity so please be careful.

 

[Tate]

I was just guessing that the poster called in a tip, left a message and Cindy called her back. I have no idea just my impression.

Also, it is against TOS to try and reveal someone's identity so please be careful.

I never asked for their identity... Only if they were a family member, friend, or follower, so please don't put words in my mouth... Also curious where, as you say "it's against TOS to try to reveal someone's identity?" I know it's against the rules to post first and last names, but if someone wants to reveal who they are, what's wrong with that? Link, please...

 

[SuziQ]

Evidence Supporting Caylee is Alive thread:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70013

 

[CHICANA]

I was just guessing that the poster called in a tip, left a message and Cindy called her back. I have no idea just my impression.

Also, it is against TOS to try and reveal someone's identity so please be careful.

In her first posts she said she called in a tip and she thinks she saw Caylee July 5th.
She called the Tips line and NOBODY CALLED HER BACK so she called Cindy.

 

[Tate]

In her first posts she said she called in a tip and she thinks she saw Caylee July 5th.
She called the Tips line and NOBODY CALLED HER BACK so she called Cindy.

Thank you, Chicana.

 

[JBean]

I never asked for their identity... Only if they were a family member, friend, or follower, so please don't put words in my mouth... Also curious where, as you say "it's against TOS to try to reveal someone's identity?" I know it's against the rules to post first and last names, but if someone wants to reveal who they are, what's wrong with that? Link, please...

It is not against TOS to reveal who you are. It is a violation to try and reveal who someone else is. I only asked that you be careful. You seemed as though you were trying to uncover personal information as to the identity of a poster. . We all value our privacy here. This information was offered in good spirit.

 

[JBean]

In her first posts she said she called in a tip and she thinks she saw Caylee July 5th.
She called the Tips line and NOBODY CALLED HER BACK so she called Cindy.

Oh hey I got one right! Thanks Chicana.

 

[CHICANA]

Allen also said this yesterday...


"At this point, we are trying to hold some information close to protect the integrity of the investigation," Allen said. "But clearly, out job is to find her whether she is dead or alive."

http://www.local6.com/news/17354989/detail.html

I thought he just said she was dead.
So many flip flops, I think he'd make a fine presidential candidate.

 

[Theonly1]

We don't know. Le doesn't offer everything in their hand right away, as we all know by now. Here's some food for thought:

1. The day the police were originally called, George was back there moving around the playhouse and looking under the slabs for any signs of "foul play" and Cindy was looking in the shed.

2. The dogs hit by the sandbox and it was later found out that Cindy had taken toys from the car and put them back in the sandbox.

this site has great stuff! http://www.ilpwda.com/faqs.htm

Are the facts for #1 and #2 in the discovery docs? If so, I think I might be missing a few pages! Also, like you mentioned, if Cindy took toys (reeking of decomp) and took them from the car to the sandbox them the dogs would hit on the sandbox!!!
T

 

[Tate]

It is not against TOS to reveal who you are. It is a violation to try and reveal who someone else is. I only asked that you be careful. You seemed as though you were trying to uncover personal information as to the identity of a poster. . We all value our privacy here. This information was offered in good spirit.

Again, I only asked if the person was a family member, friend, or follower because the poster indicated Cindy called her. What's wrong with that? I didn't ask for their name, so your assumption that I was trying to uncover personal information as to the indentity of the poster is wrong. And, yes, we do value our privacy here. But thanks for offering your information in good spirit.:bananapowerslide:

 

[Theonly1]

The lining of the nose and mouth oozes out in a fluid substance between 4 and 7 days after death as it "breaks down". In "tropical" climates this can occur more quickly...like in the trunk of a car in the Florida heat.

And the contents of the stain was precisely the lining of the nose and mouth (as reported).
T

 

[JBean]

Again, I only asked if the person was a family member, friend, or follower because the poster indicated Cindy called her. What's wrong with that? I didn't ask for their name, so your assumption that I was trying to uncover personal information as to the indentity of the poster is wrong. And, yes, we do value our privacy here. But thanks for offering your information in good spirit.:bananapowerslide:

you are very welcome.

 

[Theonly1]

[snip]
And with that you believe that she isn't dead? Or is it like an earlier poster said, people just want to be contrary.

Just a general comment here:
Some people still believe the earth is flat and that the USA did not go to the moon. A lively debate here is nice. Questioning evidence is acceptable. But arguing with someone who has a vastly different and entrenched opinion here is useless (imho). Those who tend to believe in science can calmly point out its strengths (and its weaknesses). Those who believe in fairy tales can do the same.

 

[jbar]

That's a very good point. Some people still believe that dinosaurs are a myth and not proven as well.

 

[CHICANA]

That's a very good point. Some people still believe that dinosaurs are a myth and not proven as well.

Some people still like to wait for official confirmation instead of indications and beliefs before stating something as fact.

If it were fact I think we'd see murder charges right now.

 

[krimekat]

Some people still like to wait for official confirmation instead of indications and beliefs before stating something as fact.

If it were fact I think we'd see murder charges right now.

I bet we will tomorrow . . .

 

[jbar]

When LE is stating from their own mouths what FBI tests confirm - it's both FACT AND offical confirmation.

 

[jbar]

I bet we will tomorrow . . .

Exactly. There is a deal on the table. You won't be seeing any charges until that has expired.