When they did the canal search..somthings besides vehicles were pulled from the canal the first day or so, before they started to drain the canal.
The ISP said they would be looking at everything that was pulled out.
Then they drained the canal and stated nothing was found. I keep hoping that something small was found, that was the resaon for draining the canal . Also while ther was live coverage Drew had stated to reporters that he spent the day watching it with Brodsky..if he did do that then he must have been afraid they would find something..why else watch with your lawyer when we know Drew has had no interest in any of the other searches?
Stacy may have not been left at the canal, but Drew was more then likely there that night, and may have been afraid he left some sort of evidence behind other then a cell phone ping.
Fox News, "The Big Story," just reported they are draining this part of the canal? Any local news on this?
Okay, I rewound "The Big Story," and here is the gist of what they reported:
Mary Frances Briegel(sp) of WBBM radio says they reportedly began draining the canal last night and sources say they know exactly what they are looking for. According to her, local reporters are speculating that GJ testimony may have led to draining the canal for a specific item.
Lieberman (AMW guy) says that AMW has received quite a few tips regarding this particular canal. Also talked a bit about Steve Peterson being re-subpoenaed to the GJ, saying that seems significant to him.
I don't know, to drain a huge canal, the water has to go somewhere. Unless they were able to close off a section within the locks??
On Nancy Grace right now they are showing pictures from earlier today and saying that they are draining the canal. I just switched to it so I didn't catch the whole thing.
Well, Dee...we weren't the ones who said it! The media did. By drain, I suppose they meant they held up the water in the locks to lower the water where they were searching. I do recall reading it more than one place tho.
I think it was strange that DP showed that kind of interest in the canal search when he apparently showed no interest in any of the ground searches. Perhaps he threw something else into that canal - like a piece of jewelry Stacy had on, or a cell phone, or something along those lines.....something of Stacy's that would connect him to being there.
Well, Dee...we weren't the ones who said it! The media did. By drain, I suppose they meant they held up the water in the locks to lower the water where they were searching. I do recall reading or hearing it more than one place tho. Here are a few mentions and there are others on that thread, too.
We discussed this in Cal-Sag Thread #2:
Please show me a link to where they "drained" the canal.
IMHO it would be literally IMPOSSIBLE to drain a canal as big as the Sanitary and Ship Canal. It extends 28 miles and takes the waste water away from Chicago. It is 25 feet deep and 60 feet wide all the way down the 28 mile stretch. http://www.lewisu.edu/imcanal/corridorintime/chapter6.htm
It would be a logistics nightmare to even attempt draining this canal. If they had drained it, it would have been HUGE news throughout Chicagoland. I haven't heard a thing about them draining it (or seen it drained) and I live a mile from the canal, if that.
I kind of think they may be doing a lot of background research right now, and also verifying a few things......you think??Yes, it is too quiet! I don't like that the headlines are starting to taper off about Stacy or even DP. Maybe he will pull some boneheaded stunt to bring the case back up to "story of the year" status again. We can only hope!
Should at a minimum meet twice a week, best would be Mon-Wed-FriI would like answers on the GJ questions, too. Meeting once a week doesn't seem like a great way to speed things along, does it?! It is rather like watching ice melt.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.