- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
- Messages
- 273
- Reaction score
- 521
Also if JY planned well enough to wear gloves and cover up so well that he didn't get a drop of blood or a scratch on him, why would he be so careless as to wear his own hush puppy shoes?
I don't agree.
I don't even think the Youngs were thinking about anything being missing for a long time, they didn't care about "stuff" until later.
The Youngs are not a poor family, Mrs. Young sits on a million dollars worth of property, and Jason's salary was amazing, and looks like Heather was doing good as well.........
I think she cleaned herself and that's why the feet cleaning was only half done. The daycare employees and Meredith both testified that the child was able to turn on the taps and wash her hands. The bathroom has one set of prints belonging to the child. She talked about a wash cloth. There are child's prints on the carpet between the bedroom and the bathroom. I don't see anything pointing to another person washing her feet ... and I don't believe it happened in the backyard.
Nope...
CY was heard asking for a washcloth but she never says why or for whom.
Because he thought he'd strangle her and be done with it? Just thinking out loud here, but maybe he never intended to have to beat her to a bloody mess. It's possible, IMO, that when she woke and tried to get his hands off her, he flew into a rage that things were veering off plan, so he wailed on her, as if to say 'fight me now, b--ch.'Also if JY planned well enough to wear gloves and cover up so well that he didn't get a drop of blood or a scratch on him, why would he be so careless as to wear his own hush puppy shoes?
Also if JY planned well enough to wear gloves and cover up so well that he didn't get a drop of blood or a scratch on him, why would he be so careless as to wear his own hush puppy shoes?
Also if JY planned well enough to wear gloves and cover up so well that he didn't get a drop of blood or a scratch on him, why would he be so careless as to wear his own hush puppy shoes?
And it's been answered several times.Thank you!!! I've been asking that all along.... I asked hubby if he were planning on killing someone what would he plan..What would he do first... He answer was gloves and different shoes.... Shoes that he would never wear.... Thrift store shoes....
Of course my hubby is a teddy bear..He would never do that.... It takes a lot for him to get mad...
Where on the wall was the mark(s)?? How high??? The photo Im looking at shows lil prints low on the wall.. Maybe like she was playing in the blood.. Yes I know thats bad, but its something a 2 yr old may do.. Not really understanding...
Also in the pic what is the gold looking cloth?? Towel? blanket?
<modsnip>
Thank you!!! I've been asking that all along.... I asked hubby if he were planning on killing someone what would he plan..What would he do first... He answer was gloves and different shoes.... Shoes that he would never wear.... Thrift store shoes....
Of course my hubby is a teddy bear..He would never do that.... It takes a lot for him to get mad...
I don't know about the gloves (whether he had them or not), but I think he didn't expect the blood. And that's why the pullover is missing, and why he wouldn't have been concerned about the HP's. The big issue with that is the size 10 Franklins. Those would mean, if possessed by JY, that he planned to leave tracks of something somewhere. And if he planned that, then I agree it would be bad judgment or a very bad plan to have put on his traceable shoes and then leave footprints at the scene.
I think the size 12 footprints are strong evidence against him. But the Franklins remain a mystery. I'm afraid it probably could mean there were two people there. And that is a big can of worms for the state if that is the case.
No wash cloth, no blood in the sink.
BBM.
With all due respect sitting on a million dollars worth of property isn't much these days. And even so how do you think the wealthy remain wealthy? Certainly not by throwing away $$$ that can be legitimately claimed. No it makes no sense for a man who was so concerned about his assets that he mentioned taking a hit on the house and being able to keep his house hours after the brutal murder of his wife and yet not claim thousands and thousands of dollars worth of jewelry as stolen.
He AND his family (especially "mommy") would have been all over that like white on rice.
He planned that too.
It may have been months before they even knew anything was missing.
Maybe they thought Michelle's rings and earrings were seized from the scene.
Not everyone is thinking about filing an insurance report or collecting on insurance money......
jmo
Why?I think the problem I have with the theory that this was supposed to be a strangulation with little to no blood is that there was likely a weapon used. And without knowing what it is, I assume it was taken from a garage, or something, not something typically left around a bedroom.
Did he bring a weapon just in case? Or did he grab a candlestick off the dresser? A lot of questions pros may have to answer in their closing.
Apparently not if he had to stop to buy $15 worth of gas. That was a big risk to take for having planned everything else.
I will say that these points give me pause.And had to stop again the next morning. Don't forget that. He would have had to stop on his way to his appointment that morning too. Something we just have to assume he did do.