State vs. Jason Lynn Young 02-29-12

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,001
Also if JY planned well enough to wear gloves and cover up so well that he didn't get a drop of blood or a scratch on him, why would he be so careless as to wear his own hush puppy shoes?
 
  • #1,002
I don't agree.

I don't even think the Youngs were thinking about anything being missing for a long time, they didn't care about "stuff" until later.

The Youngs are not a poor family, Mrs. Young sits on a million dollars worth of property, and Jason's salary was amazing, and looks like Heather was doing good as well.........

BBM.

With all due respect sitting on a million dollars worth of property isn't much these days. And even so how do you think the wealthy remain wealthy? Certainly not by throwing away $$$ that can be legitimately claimed. No it makes no sense for a man who was so concerned about his assets that he mentioned taking a hit on the house and being able to keep his house hours after the brutal murder of his wife and yet not claim thousands and thousands of dollars worth of jewelry as stolen.

He AND his family (especially "mommy") would have been all over that like white on rice.
 
  • #1,003
I think she cleaned herself and that's why the feet cleaning was only half done. The daycare employees and Meredith both testified that the child was able to turn on the taps and wash her hands. The bathroom has one set of prints belonging to the child. She talked about a wash cloth. There are child's prints on the carpet between the bedroom and the bathroom. I don't see anything pointing to another person washing her feet ... and I don't believe it happened in the backyard.

No wash cloth, no blood in the sink.
 
  • #1,004
Nope...

CY was heard asking for a washcloth but she never says why or for whom.

If anyone is wondering what the child used to clean her feet, I think the answer is simple ... she used the washcloth she mentioned during the 911 call.
 
  • #1,005
Also if JY planned well enough to wear gloves and cover up so well that he didn't get a drop of blood or a scratch on him, why would he be so careless as to wear his own hush puppy shoes?
Because he thought he'd strangle her and be done with it? Just thinking out loud here, but maybe he never intended to have to beat her to a bloody mess. It's possible, IMO, that when she woke and tried to get his hands off her, he flew into a rage that things were veering off plan, so he wailed on her, as if to say 'fight me now, b--ch.'

Another answer is: killers make mistakes and get caught all the time.
 
  • #1,006
Also if JY planned well enough to wear gloves and cover up so well that he didn't get a drop of blood or a scratch on him, why would he be so careless as to wear his own hush puppy shoes?

I don't know about the gloves (whether he had them or not), but I think he didn't expect the blood. And that's why the pullover is missing, and why he wouldn't have been concerned about the HP's. The big issue with that is the size 10 Franklins. Those would mean, if possessed by JY, that he planned to leave tracks of something somewhere. And if he planned that, then I agree it would be bad judgment or a very bad plan to have put on his traceable shoes and then leave footprints at the scene.

I think the size 12 footprints are strong evidence against him. But the Franklins remain a mystery. I'm afraid it probably could mean there were two people there. And that is a big can of worms for the state if that is the case.
 
  • #1,007
Also if JY planned well enough to wear gloves and cover up so well that he didn't get a drop of blood or a scratch on him, why would he be so careless as to wear his own hush puppy shoes?

Thank you!!! I've been asking that all along.... I asked hubby if he were planning on killing someone what would he plan..What would he do first... He answer was gloves and different shoes.... Shoes that he would never wear.... Thrift store shoes....

Of course my hubby is a teddy bear..He would never do that.... It takes a lot for him to get mad...
 
  • #1,008
Thank you!!! I've been asking that all along.... I asked hubby if he were planning on killing someone what would he plan..What would he do first... He answer was gloves and different shoes.... Shoes that he would never wear.... Thrift store shoes....

Of course my hubby is a teddy bear..He would never do that.... It takes a lot for him to get mad...
And it's been answered several times.

He wasn't expecting a strangulation to turn into a mess. He f'd up, that's how a lot of killers get caught.
 
  • #1,009
Where on the wall was the mark(s)?? How high??? The photo Im looking at shows lil prints low on the wall.. Maybe like she was playing in the blood.. Yes I know thats bad, but its something a 2 yr old may do.. Not really understanding...

Also in the pic what is the gold looking cloth?? Towel? blanket?

<modsnip>

I'll have to look at the pics again, they could have been low. I just remember there were blood smears on the wall. I don't think anyone else was in the bathroom because her prints on the floor would have been smeared at least. Unless the person was very careful for whatever reason to avoid smearing them.
 
  • #1,010
Thank you!!! I've been asking that all along.... I asked hubby if he were planning on killing someone what would he plan..What would he do first... He answer was gloves and different shoes.... Shoes that he would never wear.... Thrift store shoes....

Of course my hubby is a teddy bear..He would never do that.... It takes a lot for him to get mad...

That's why I had wondered whether he had come in the Franklins planning to put on the other ones or a getaway. But I have to admit, that is conjecture only and not the most logical theory at all.
 
  • #1,011
I don't know about the gloves (whether he had them or not), but I think he didn't expect the blood. And that's why the pullover is missing, and why he wouldn't have been concerned about the HP's. The big issue with that is the size 10 Franklins. Those would mean, if possessed by JY, that he planned to leave tracks of something somewhere. And if he planned that, then I agree it would be bad judgment or a very bad plan to have put on his traceable shoes and then leave footprints at the scene.

I think the size 12 footprints are strong evidence against him. But the Franklins remain a mystery. I'm afraid it probably could mean there were two people there. And that is a big can of worms for the state if that is the case.

I think the problem I have with the theory that this was supposed to be a strangulation with little to no blood is that there was likely a weapon used. And without knowing what it is, I assume it was taken from a garage, or something, not something typically left around a bedroom.

Did he bring a weapon just in case? Or did he grab a candlestick off the dresser? A lot of questions pros may have to answer in their closing.
 
  • #1,012
  • #1,013
BBM.

With all due respect sitting on a million dollars worth of property isn't much these days. And even so how do you think the wealthy remain wealthy? Certainly not by throwing away $$$ that can be legitimately claimed. No it makes no sense for a man who was so concerned about his assets that he mentioned taking a hit on the house and being able to keep his house hours after the brutal murder of his wife and yet not claim thousands and thousands of dollars worth of jewelry as stolen.

He AND his family (especially "mommy") would have been all over that like white on rice.

It may have been months before they even knew anything was missing.

Maybe they thought Michelle's rings and earrings were seized from the scene.

Not everyone is thinking about filing an insurance report or collecting on insurance money......


jmo
 
  • #1,014
There's a like a tiny agreement along the DMZ of G and NG posters. :fence:

I won't mention the Franklin shoe prints if you won't mention the HP's!
 
  • #1,015
He planned that too.

Apparently not if he had to stop to buy $15 worth of gas. That was a big risk to take for having planned everything else.
 
  • #1,016
It may have been months before they even knew anything was missing.

Maybe they thought Michelle's rings and earrings were seized from the scene.

Not everyone is thinking about filing an insurance report or collecting on insurance money......


jmo

If they had immediately filed the insurance report, that would have been declared heartless, I'm sure.
 
  • #1,017
I think the problem I have with the theory that this was supposed to be a strangulation with little to no blood is that there was likely a weapon used. And without knowing what it is, I assume it was taken from a garage, or something, not something typically left around a bedroom.

Did he bring a weapon just in case? Or did he grab a candlestick off the dresser? A lot of questions pros may have to answer in their closing.
Why?

I assume it was nearby, like in the bedroom closet, for example. Or under the bed.
 
  • #1,018
Apparently not if he had to stop to buy $15 worth of gas. That was a big risk to take for having planned everything else.

And had to stop again the next morning. Don't forget that. He would have had to stop on his way to his appointment that morning too. Something we just have to assume he did do.
 
  • #1,019
LOL @ DMZ

I just played with that particular feature in my wireless router.

/closet geek
 
  • #1,020
And had to stop again the next morning. Don't forget that. He would have had to stop on his way to his appointment that morning too. Something we just have to assume he did do.
I will say that these points give me pause.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
117
Guests online
1,555
Total visitors
1,672

Forum statistics

Threads
632,451
Messages
18,626,952
Members
243,159
Latest member
Tank0228
Back
Top