Please don't hit me. But I just got to thinking.
To take a child into protective custody they have to have evidence that the child is in danger. Living with a parent who allegedly killed their mother isn't enough legally. Murder suspects bond out and retain custody of their children all the time.
Their grandfather is accused of taking and keeping possession of child




. But the grandfather is removed from the home and none of the pictures have been alleged to be from the children themselves. And currently there isn't any indication of harm ever coming to the children. Ok children who are sexually abused by the father often continue to stay with the mother after the father is removed from the home as long as there is no indication that the mother was complict. And at this point there isn't any indication that JP knew what his father was doing or that the boys were involved at all.
So what are we missing? Why (other than the obvious speculation I have) what grounds did they use for removing the children from the home? It has never been alleged that JP ever harmed the kids themselves. And it seems the only person who can be charged with a crime has been removed from the HH. And there hasn't been any allegations of neglect at this point.
So is there something else happening behind the scenes? Something we don't know yet that gave them the grounds for removal? (Impending arrest???)