TX Suzanne Clark Simpson missing in San Antonio, last seen by friends at dinner - 6 October 2024 *Arrest* #2

  • #421
I remember back at the beginning of this case, I thought it would be open and shut. Seemed pretty clear Brad killed Suzanne and disposed of her body.

Boy was I wrong, a year later and Suzanne still hasn’t been found, assets are being sold, and Cotter is still holding out. Brad of course will never talk.
 
  • #422
I remember back at the beginning of this case, I thought it would be open and shut. Seemed pretty clear Brad killed Suzanne and disposed of her body.

Boy was I wrong, a year later and Suzanne still hasn’t been found, assets are being sold, and Cotter is still holding out. Brad of course will never talk.
Yep. Feels (to me) a bit like the Crystal Rogers case before the big breaks came.

Bring on the big breaks!
 
  • #423
  • #424
  • #425
  • #426

The sister of Suzanne Simpson has been arrested after allegedly harassing relatives of Suzanne's husband, Brad, with voice messages and emails that accused them of killing the 51-year-old Olmos Park woman who disappeared a year ago.

*****
Even after the family got law enforcement involved and police ordered Clark to stop contacting them, the affidavit states, she continued her barrage of threatening messages along with running a "vigorous social media campaign besmirching" Brad's family.

Clark was arrested Thursday and faces multiple counts of harassment.

******
See article for more details.
 
  • #427
  • #428
  • #429
From the article:

Under Texas law, a person convicted of intentionally killing someone cannot inherit from them, even if they’re named as a beneficiary in the victim’s will. It’s called the “slayer rule,” and it treats the accused as though they died before the victim. If Brad Simpson is convicted, he would lose any right to Suzanne’s estate or to serve as executor of her will.

Forensics expert Joanna Collins with Linus Investigations and Consulting says digital evidence will also be key at trial.

Digital evidence is very prolific, very usable, and is playing a much larger role in the trial process overall. So physical evidence, the things that people typically think about, like blood and DNA and footprints and fingerprints and those things are still very important, but digital evidence is playing a much larger role in many cases, not just in this one, Collins said.


 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
2,639
Total visitors
2,768

Forum statistics

Threads
632,883
Messages
18,632,992
Members
243,323
Latest member
lalaberry
Back
Top