snipped by me from here
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm
CANINE SEARCH OF MR MURAT'S PROPERTY.
The property was subjected to a search for human remains or blood stained
articles. The outside of property was stripped of vegetation and after the
ground being probed was searched by the EVRD dog. The inside of the
property was then searched by the dog. There were no alert indications and
no human remains were located.
Your "facts" don't seem to tally with the official reports, yet you state them as proof, do you have any evidence to back up your claim?
If you look at my entire post you will see I am replying to a comment about the Prout case NOt anything to do with Murat - I have even quoted the comment I am replying to where one can see it is about Prout and not Murat. Here is the entire post including the quoted comment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clutchbag
what rubbish
Eddie did not take part in the search for kate prouts body in the grounds of the farm recently, why lie??? Oh i know, to discredit the cadaver dog that alerted in the mccann case, duh
Eddie did though INDEED take part in the original search in the house and alerted years back and guess what, he was right
Eddie took part in the original search in the house and grounds. he barke din the house where no body was ever found, but failed to bark when searching in the burial area. That was only found because the killer told the police where the body was. If the dog was so accurate like the red tops would tell their readers, one might think they might have noticed the decomposing body under their paws.
(I am assuming you had missed this bit and were not of the belief that Murat's home was searched for Kate Prout)