When you say weirdness, I'm sure you mean coincidence. This accumulation of coincidence will continue to occur as you examine both CPH and the LISK. If it seems like you are on an easter egg hunt where each and every egg you find contains a winning raffle ticket, it is because they are not coincidences. If CPH and the LISK were not one and the same, than the two seperate and distinct trails would be comprised of events and characteristics that have a low correlation to each other. I've accumulated a lot of data on both individuals, and the correlation is approaching 1.
Stating that you accumulated a lot of data on both individuals and the correlation is approaching 1 implies that all of the victims were killed by one killer. Except you don't have a shred of evidence to prove that there is just one serial killer (versus multiple killers). It also implies that you have actual factual data about the killer that matches factual data about CPH.
So how do you make a statement like that and then expect others not to accuse you of leading a witch hunt against CPH?
You can't just irresponsibly throw around rumors about another person without backing them up with facts. Once again, writing false or unproven statements about a person that can damage his reputation is libel. You might believe in your mind that CPH is a criminal (and very well could be). But unless you can back your statement with actual facts, you are (intentionally or unintentionally) defaming his character.