The Last Happy Hour, book by Charles Joseph Hackett

When you say weirdness, I'm sure you mean coincidence. This accumulation of coincidence will continue to occur as you examine both CPH and the LISK. If it seems like you are on an easter egg hunt where each and every egg you find contains a winning raffle ticket, it is because they are not coincidences. If CPH and the LISK were not one and the same, than the two seperate and distinct trails would be comprised of events and characteristics that have a low correlation to each other. I've accumulated a lot of data on both individuals, and the correlation is approaching 1.

Stating that you accumulated a lot of data on both individuals and the correlation is approaching 1 implies that all of the victims were killed by one killer. Except you don't have a shred of evidence to prove that there is just one serial killer (versus multiple killers). It also implies that you have actual factual data about the killer that matches factual data about CPH.

So how do you make a statement like that and then expect others not to accuse you of leading a witch hunt against CPH?

You can't just irresponsibly throw around rumors about another person without backing them up with facts. Once again, writing false or unproven statements about a person that can damage his reputation is libel. You might believe in your mind that CPH is a criminal (and very well could be). But unless you can back your statement with actual facts, you are (intentionally or unintentionally) defaming his character.
 
Stating that you accumulated a lot of data on both individuals and the correlation is approaching 1 implies that all of the victims were killed by one killer.

No, it does not imply that. But I do happen to think they were all killed by the same individual.

So how do you make a statement like that and then expect others not to accuse you of leading a witch hunt against CPH?


Others can accuse me of whatever they want to accuse me of and you can call it whatever you want to call it. I find public data on CPH and share it with interested parties. I draw my own conclusions and opinions from the data and occasionally share those opinions, I hope everyone draws their own conclusions as well because that is the point of crowdsourcing and collective intelligence. I believe in this method of solving problems as it relates to crime and that is the only reason I do what I do.

Can you decipher the difference between what I am doing and "starting rumors"?
 
Sometimes I wonder if he's the Richard Jewell of this case.

When I quoted and commented on your post previously, I should of said:

If that turns out to be true (that the doc has been unfairly maligned a la Richard Jewell), the doctor has endured a grave injustice.

I didn't mean to imply that what you were thinking was a grave injustice because that's certainly not true.

I am terribly sorry if I gave that impression.
 
When I quoted and commented on your post previously, I should of said:

If that turns out to be true (that the doc has been unfairly maligned a la Richard Jewell), the doctor has endured a grave injustice.

I didn't mean to imply that what you were thinking was a grave injustice because that's certainly not true.

I am terribly sorry if I gave that impression.

I caught your meaning the first time. But thanks for thinking of it.
 
No, it does not imply that. But I do happen to think they were all killed by the same individual.




Others can accuse me of whatever they want to accuse me of and you can call it whatever you want to call it. I find public data on CPH and share it with interested parties. I draw my own conclusions and opinions from the data and occasionally share those opinions, I hope everyone draws their own conclusions as well because that is the point of crowdsourcing and collective intelligence. I believe in this method of solving problems as it relates to crime and that is the only reason I do what I do.

Can you decipher the difference between what I am doing and "starting rumors"?

Stick JMO at the end of your opinions. That's what most of us do. ;)
 
For some reason, I recall the leg amputation being the result of CPH stopping to help another motorist and being slammed by another car.

Can't tell you now where the hell I read that (it's been months since I sleuthed it), but maybe it will give another sleuther a jumping off point if they want to try to track down the source.

Hi MK and all,
I don't have any info that I can document or post links to - but I remember as I researched CPH, day by day info on him became unavailable (obviously, someone was deleting everything that had to do with CPH..)
...so as I researched the car accident I found fleeting info, but CPH was said to have lost one or both legs in an accident...IMO, we need to find out more about that. Great sleuthing all!
 
First, I think the title of this thread should be C. Peter Hackett....just to make it easier to locate our posts about him.

Truthspider has posted that he thinks that victims other than Gilbert may have decomposed or been hidden in the same spot where Gilbert's belongings were found. And we all know who TS's main POI is in this case.

But, are we to believe that CPH was the one & only person in that community who ever went into that marsh area? There appears to be drainage ditches, paths, even vehicle paths. Is it so dense that other Oak Beach residents or their grandkids wouldn't go exploring, hiking or walk their animals there?

and, if the marsh was not where remains were "kept," where did CPH keep them? does he own a nearby property, or still own his father's home?

I also keep going back to the Manhattan connection with some of the girls. Why would CPH be in Manhattan?
 
He would go to Manhattan because it has been one of his trolling places perhaps. And he might go to Manhattan to make calls in an attempt to hide where he lives. And keeping them somewhere. He knew Long Beach and its surrounding like the back of his hand. He had a boat. He and/or the Manorville SK would have needed a place to torture and kill his victims if he kept them any period of time and he would have needed a freezer. He had enough money to rent or own such a place that no one else knew about. That's my guess.
 
I'm also doubtful that CPH would be out at 1 or 2 in the morning when some of the girls vanished unless his wife was working those nights. From what I've read though, his wife arrived home late in the afternoon from work (per the JJ fieldnotes piece)
 
I thought she worked the midnight shift, at least before the GB4 came to light.
 
First, I think the title of this thread should be C. Peter Hackett....just to make it easier to locate our posts about him.

Truthspider has posted that he thinks that victims other than Gilbert may have decomposed or been hidden in the same spot where Gilbert's belongings were found. And we all know who TS's main POI is in this case.

But, are we to believe that CPH was the one & only person in that community who ever went into that marsh area? There appears to be drainage ditches, paths, even vehicle paths. Is it so dense that other Oak Beach residents or their grandkids wouldn't go exploring, hiking or walk their animals there?

and, if the marsh was not where remains were "kept," where did CPH keep them? does he own a nearby property, or still own his father's home?

I also keep going back to the Manhattan connection with some of the girls. Why would CPH be in Manhattan?

because after he used the phone in massapequa it ended up in the news?
 
I'm also doubtful that CPH would be out at 1 or 2 in the morning when some of the girls vanished unless his wife was working those nights. From what I've read though, his wife arrived home late in the afternoon from work (per the JJ fieldnotes piece)

People who work in Emergency Medicine have work schedules that are exactly like that...

Do you have any information about him that would suggest he wouldn't be up at 1 or 2 am? Or are you simply basing that statement off of a stereotype?
 
People who work in Emergency Medicine have work schedules that are exactly like that...

Do you have any information about him that would suggest he wouldn't be up at 1 or 2 am? Or are you simply basing that statement off of a stereotype?

My son is an RN working ICU but he has a set shift. I would think that CPH's wife also has a set shift.

I have no info on CPH nighttime hours...do you??? It just seems reasonable to think that if a man is married, that his wife would be aware of his whereabouts at that time of the night (if the wife wasn't working) and like I said, the JJfieldnotes had her arriving home from work late afternoon.

Of course it's possible that she worked nights at some point. And if she did, well there ya go.
 
I was unaware he is working now, except out of his home and as a "patient advocate."
 
His medical board info indicates he hasn't worked emergency rooms since 20006, although I suppose he could work temporary in hospitals that are very short staffed. I know about the schedule at one of our local hospitals that I thought was pretty strange. The ER docs work a straight 4 day 24 hr. schedule and then are off for 3 days. They sleep in a little room off the emergency room. I heard this from an ER doc who liked this schedule because she had a horse farm and was able to go there on weekends. It may have been more than three days she had off. I can't remember. I wouldn't want to be treated by a doctor who had basically been up 72 hours or more.
 
I have a question for anyone who thinks it was CPH. Do you think he was involved with JB or do you think he just happened to find her running around the neighborhood? Is there any evidence that JB and CPH are friends?

If it's the latter he must be the luckiest man alive. He's a serial killer that kills prostitutes and in the middle of the night a prostitute goes running past his house so he kills her. But then again how would he even know she was a prostitute?
 
I have a question for anyone who thinks it was CPH. Do you think he was involved with JB or do you think he just happened to find her running around the neighborhood? Is there any evidence that JB and CPH are friends?

If it's the latter he must be the luckiest man alive. He's a serial killer that kills prostitutes and in the middle of the night a prostitute goes running past his house so he kills her. But then again how would he even know she was a prostitute?

There has been much discussion about the fact that JB and CPH would have had to know each other because of the Oak Beach Association. I believe CPH was either at JB's "party" that night (may even have been "the drifter") or I believe as Mari is said to have stated on her website that Shannan od'd, they took her to CPH's house but then was told not to help her and she died. OR CPH sold them drugs to get high that night and knew where SG was or she was delivered to his house by MP, never to be seen again. I do not believe Mrs. H was there that night. I think JB, MP, and CPH definitely know what happened and all are incriminated so that they have to stick together with their lies. How it exactly went down I don't know. I think MP had delivered girls to OB in the past. There are rumors his van had been seen at CPH's house before and after SG disappeared. I was leaning toward CPH helping them until the discovery by TS of The Last Happy Hour's revelations. That changed everything for me.
 
I have a question for anyone who thinks it was CPH. Do you think he was involved with JB or do you think he just happened to find her running around the neighborhood? Is there any evidence that JB and CPH are friends?

If it's the latter he must be the luckiest man alive. He's a serial killer that kills prostitutes and in the middle of the night a prostitute goes running past his house so he kills her. But then again how would he even know she was a prostitute?

CPH stated that he didn't even know who Joseph Brewer was til Gilbert went missing.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
143
Guests online
406
Total visitors
549

Forum statistics

Threads
625,820
Messages
18,510,886
Members
240,851
Latest member
pondy55
Back
Top