I would love to know what LE has that we will not know until it's released (if ever). Could it be this http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/09/the-dark-side-of-caylees-life/
That made me cry.
I appreciate you sharing it though Mrs. G.
I would love to know what LE has that we will not know until it's released (if ever). Could it be this http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/01/09/the-dark-side-of-caylees-life/
Didn't they also say their interviews with LE was a waste of time (at least the lead to the article did)?
Didn't they also say their interviews with LE was a waste of time (at least the lead to the article did)?
That made me cry.
I appreciate you sharing it though Mrs. G.
I know, it's bad isn't it. I hope the SA investigate this and bring it into trial.
Have they yet brought up their claim in the teaser: "We'll examine his stunning claims that little Caylee was possibly abused"? If they did, I sure missed it.
Is there a thread on that article? I would like to ask a question about it, but don't want to derail this thread.
Okay the JVM show has nothing new. Just a rehash of old information.
I couldn't find one (doesn't mean there isn't one), since there was no new info on JVM let's discuss....
The question is, was this headline on JVM seeded by JB and if so .... why?
JVM would not get this info from the LE (YM) or SA.
You can argue that this taints the future Jury pool in favor of Caylee, that she was abused as well as murdered BUT is the Defense strategy to go after YM and show that he was blinded by his focus on ICA and perception she abused Caylee (unfounded?) and thus did not investigate the SODDI?