The State v. Jodi Arias: break in trial until 28 January 2013 #13 *ADULT CONTENT*

[Linda7NJ]

Thanks for the encouragement, though I'll admit I'm afraid when I drive down the interstate tomorrow and pass the sign for the INNER SPACE CAVERNS I'll have flashbacks of the cavernous horror!!

I had the "what's in your wallet" commercial going on in my head...with Jodi saying in response..."wallet? Who needs a wallet?" And then...I suffered severe flashbacks of those bits.

Lol

 

[katiecoolady]

I'm sitting here watching In Session from today and these interrogation tapes (again--the ones in the orange jumpsuit).

I honestly wonder how they decided to go with the self defense excuse vs. insanity because looking at these tapes I think they could have much more successful sold a story to the jury about her being insane. Because she seems completely nuts. Mind you I don't think she qualifies as insane in the legal sense. But her behavior, the rubbing of her neck and back and seeming totally out of it...seems nuts. Of course then she pulls out of that and cheerfully talks about playing with Napolean smiling and giggling then in to her crazy intruder story...all while knowing what kind of deep doodoo she's in.

So incredibly off.

 

[Linda7NJ]

He reminds me of Ronnie from Jersey Shore! Maybe I'll watch it again and *fist pump* every time Dalia lies and acts crazy!!! LOLOL

Ever seen the Donna Fryman episode!??!?! I've seen it at least 10 times!!! One of my favs for sure!!

Never seen Donna. Should I google?

 

[norest4thewicked]

Originally Posted by mscharliechan
i'm trying hard to understand details of that 3,000 pixel blow-up of the reflection in travis' eye. But i just can't make out much.

Hopefully someone who "gets it" will create a version of it, outlining the gun and camera. Initially i got it, but now my overactive imagination sees 100 other things (mostly just a colorful inkblot type photo i could put on pinterest!)

meanwhile, from the little i can discern, i have these questions/comments:

1. The pants in this image don't seem to resemble the dark bell-bottom jogging pants we've seen where she's dragging ta's body. Keep in mind flores says they had to malipulate the colors in the photos to see them better (which could work for or against the theory of what this claims to be)

2. Why would she wear a tight-ish, cropped jacket to do this terrible deed? It doesn't even look long enough to have pockets for holding a knife. I was wondering why she'd wear a jacket in the desert in june, but maybe it's a coat she didn't care about so she figured she'd hide the weapons in there and when it got all bloody she could just ditch it!! (i also recall her saying she bought a pair of sweatpants that were too small bc they were only sale. Maybe she's cheap and this was a kid's coat on clearance!!)

3. This eye-reflection image seems to support my theory. I have always felt she shot him first. I suppose she made him next crouch down on the shower floor, in a position where the right side of his face was closest to where she stood. And that's when/where she shot him. According to her 2nd story where the guy and girl showed up, she said he was shot first

i think the bullet didn't hurt him extremely badly (immediately), so he struggled to get away, into the bathroom, on hands and knees / belly. That also goes with her second story and that one breaks my heart bc she said she was crying out and even told her to get help :/

anyone have answers / feel the same?

I've been taking a break from here while trial is paused, but I've still been occasionally reading here. Tonight, in reading this, I just had to comment.

I'm going to say that there is absolutely NO WAY that there was a reflection in Travis' eye. In the first place, you need light for a reflection to be seen in an eye. That bathroom was very low light. Secondly, even if an original photo shows a reflection, a photo that has been enlarged will only show it as a bunch of pixels. The "reflection" being seen is simply a figment of the imagination of those who want to believe it. Lastly, if there WAS a reflection in his eyes of Jodi, don't you think that the PA would have used that piece of information? It would be quite sensational, after all.

 

[Sleuth13]

nevermind...lol....found the pic on page 22 here. I'll have to stare at it for a while.

Can't wait till the 29th.

Penny for your thoughts

 

[katiecoolady]

Andrew Johnson has great apps!

Who is he? Other than a dead President? :waitasec:

 

[Curious Me]

One hairstyle Jodi must avoid at trial is the braided pigtails. Don't you agree?

 

[Sleuth13]

I had the "what's in your wallet" commercial going on in my head...with Jodi saying in response..."wallet? Who needs a wallet?" And then...I suffered severe flashbacks of those bits.

Lol

ROFLM.drinking.more.vodka.to.forget.AO!!!!!!!!! Baaaaaaahahhahaaa!!

(As for Donna Fryman - her husband is the crazy one but she's a fiesty one too!! And her accent cracks me up!!)

 

[Really?]

Apparently you have not been smokin the doobies that were passed around earlier or partaken in the communion wine that came with the Jesus bread and tortillia wafers! :floorlaugh:

dang I missed a lot.....poopie!

I sleep from 8-3

 

[Really?]

Penny for your thoughts

haha....I couldn't make anything out of that pic. I'm jumping around pages now

 

[MsCharlieChan]

Oh. My. God. ... Just watched a video of ALL the TA shower pictures -- back-to-back with timestamps & PAUSES, so you can understand how much time lapsed between each pic being taken.

There's even a different photo I'd not seen of Travis in shower, where his facial expression shows absolute incredulity. I mean, his EYEBROWS have jumped HIGH upon his forehead; his mouth is open; he may even be making a balled fist.

Have you seen this particular shower photo?
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...70776896.54624.160510210691796&type=1&theater

P.S. Here's the timed-out sequence of all the still shots via a video:
TravisAlexander_zpsad4bd0f7.mp4 video by wasthinking - Photobucket

 

[Linda7NJ]

I'm sitting here watching In Session from today and these interrogation tapes (again--the ones in the orange jumpsuit).

I honestly wonder how they decided to go with the self defense excuse vs. insanity because looking at these tapes I think they could have much more successful sold a story to the jury about her being insane. Because she seems completely nuts. Mind you I don't think she qualifies as insane in the legal sense. But her behavior, the rubbing of her neck and back and seeming totally out of it...seems nuts. Of course then she pulls out of that and cheerfully talks about playing with Napolean smiling and giggling then in to her crazy intruder story...all while knowing what kind of deep doodoo she's in.

So incredibly off.

All that neck rubbing was part of her act. She was pretending to be fearful to tell the detective the truth about what happened. if you notice that was right around the time he asked her if she was protecting someone. She's acting all reluctant to talk. He asks about the gun...and she chirps...I never had the gun....she THINKS she's reeling him in, she's making HIM work to pull the ninja story outta her.

She had used two weapons to make it look like there were two perps. She had her alibi all lined up. When she learned LE knew she was at the scene....boom didn't take much to create ninja story. She thought she staged the crime perfectly to implicate two and the evidence would back up her ninja tale.

 

[Curious Me]

Who is he? Other than a dead President? :waitasec:

I don't know. Some other guy with apps.

 

[parker38]

I'm sitting here watching In Session from today and these interrogation tapes (again--the ones in the orange jumpsuit).

I honestly wonder how they decided to go with the self defense excuse vs. insanity because looking at these tapes I think they could have much more successful sold a story to the jury about her being insane. Because she seems completely nuts. Mind you I don't think she qualifies as insane in the legal sense. But her behavior, the rubbing of her neck and back and seeming totally out of it...seems nuts. Of course then she pulls out of that and cheerfully talks about playing with Napolean smiling and giggling then in to her crazy intruder story...all while knowing what kind of deep doodoo she's in.

So incredibly off.

And this is Jodi free of obsessions !! I saw someone relaxed, even though nuts; that achieved some kind of goal and she's at peace with it.
In her mind anyway. I don't think she looks to the future to much because
she's busy making the present the way she wants it.
Travis is gone. They'll be no Lisa, mimi or anyone else.
In her crazy mind Travis is hers; and if she has to pay the price of
prison or even death she'll roll with it! In her mind she won..

 

[Linda7NJ]

Who is he? Other than a dead President? :waitasec:

http://www.withandrewjohnson.com/

 

[itsreenw]

Originally Posted by mscharliechan
i'm trying hard to understand details of that 3,000 pixel blow-up of the reflection in travis' eye. But i just can't make out much.

Hopefully someone who "gets it" will create a version of it, outlining the gun and camera. Initially i got it, but now my overactive imagination sees 100 other things (mostly just a colorful inkblot type photo i could put on pinterest!)

meanwhile, from the little i can discern, i have these questions/comments:

1. The pants in this image don't seem to resemble the dark bell-bottom jogging pants we've seen where she's dragging ta's body. Keep in mind flores says they had to malipulate the colors in the photos to see them better (which could work for or against the theory of what this claims to be)

2. Why would she wear a tight-ish, cropped jacket to do this terrible deed? It doesn't even look long enough to have pockets for holding a knife. I was wondering why she'd wear a jacket in the desert in june, but maybe it's a coat she didn't care about so she figured she'd hide the weapons in there and when it got all bloody she could just ditch it!! (i also recall her saying she bought a pair of sweatpants that were too small bc they were only sale. Maybe she's cheap and this was a kid's coat on clearance!!)

3. This eye-reflection image seems to support my theory. I have always felt she shot him first. I suppose she made him next crouch down on the shower floor, in a position where the right side of his face was closest to where she stood. And that's when/where she shot him. According to her 2nd story where the guy and girl showed up, she said he was shot first

i think the bullet didn't hurt him extremely badly (immediately), so he struggled to get away, into the bathroom, on hands and knees / belly. That also goes with her second story and that one breaks my heart bc she said she was crying out and even told her to get help :/

anyone have answers / feel the same?

bbm...is there a link to these pics? I haven't seen them yet. TIA

 

[katiecoolady]

I don't know. Some other guy with apps.

Are apps the new abs? :waitasec:

 

[katiecoolady]

http://www.withandrewjohnson.com/

Oh! Thanks!:seeya:

 

[Linda7NJ]

Oh! Thanks!:seeya:

If you have an iPhone, just search his name in the App Store. Way more available then what I'm seeing on the link I gave ya.

 

[popsicle]

What is that in the bottom part of the picture?

Nevermind, I think it is glare.