- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,304
- Reaction score
- 16,970
Oh you're so right there. It makes for a fascinating legal battle.
I just wish it wasn't over Kyron...or any child...ever.
Agreed. Absolutely.
Oh you're so right there. It makes for a fascinating legal battle.
I just wish it wasn't over Kyron...or any child...ever.
That doesn't account for why, after the affidavit comes out, Terri and her lawyers decide to stop fighting for visitation with K. I agree that Houze is competent from all we know of him. Which begs the question of why he felt that it was better to have the public perception be that Terri cares more about herself and her freedom than she does seeing her daughter? Future strategy aside, if Houze and Bunch are thinking *public perception* with letting the texts hang out there, what do they believe public perception is of a mother who would rather have no contact with her daughter than to fight allegations (not illegal) that aren't true? (i.e. that while she was sexting, she wasn't concerned for K or Kyron, when Kaine himself says that there are at least some texts that prove that she mentioned missing Kyron and K.)
I believe that both Tiger and Spitzer both had access to their children at the time of their sexual acts...
JMO
Then continuing to litter a civil court proceeding with criminal content and accusations will prove detrimental in being able to bring about a conviction.
Unlike revenge, justice isn't best served cold. It is best served appropriately.
I don't think any of Tiger or Spitzer's kids went missing prior to their adulterous nonsense either, nor were there restraining orders filed against them. Spitzer's kids are 18 & 13. Tiger wasn't the primary caregiver in his family... apples & oranges ? I used the Tiger & Spitzer example of famous folk's reputations recovering post-lurid details of their seemingly inappropriate extra-marital sex-lives.
Terri has given the visitation thing a go - doing as much as her attorneys felt was in her interest to do. By report of her own counsel, they will still try to work it out with Team Kaine out of the court. She's taking her counsel's advice. I think much of the public will have that perception, IMO.
I have a rhetorical question or two:
I wonder, have Terri & Kaine ever sexted with each other in the past?
With others?
:waitasec:
Where did you get that the judge had already seen the texts? When Kaine mentioned the texts in his motion for contempt, he stated that a copy *could* be provided to the court if the court wished. Then the contempt motion was dropped. When he mentioned them in his motion to compel, he provided the snippet of texts that had to do with the 350K that Terri claimed to have paid Houze for his services. Then, 3 months later, when he wanted to show that contrary to Terri's motion, she wasn't really concerned with seeing her child(his opinion and burden to prove), he provided a block of texts that proved his assertions.
JMO
You are correct Rackner told the court the judge could see the unredacted copy. I was just assuming the judge would have asked for it. Kinda' hard to make a decision when things are out of context, but maybe he didn't.
Several of their text message exchanges June 30, obtained by Kaine's lawyer from law enforcement, were redacted in Exhibit A filed in court, but Kaine's lawyer alerts the court that she has the complete, unredacted copy that could be made available for the judge's examination.
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/08/kaine_hormans_lawyer_files_tex.html
Quite possible. But neither of them had missing children at the time.
I have a question for those who see no issue with Terri's sexting while Kyron was missing.
In retrospect, how did you feel about Casey Anthony's behavior while Caylee was missing, before Casey was charged?
Like Terri, Casey was the last person to see the child.
Like Terri, Casey blamed the child's disappearance on a confluence of circumstances and another person.
Like Terri, Casey's behavior was much fodder for the media and people who watched the case.
Like Terri, Casey presented a story about her whereabouts on the day the child went missing that was not the whole truth.
Like Terri, Casey engaged in sexually suggestive behavior while her child was missing.
And many other similarities...
So, considering those similarities, why is Terri's behavior while Kyron was missing excused, while Casey's generally hasn't. Unless you're one who also excuses Casey's behavior...
Just something I've wondered about awhile. Why is one's behavior excused while the other's is vilified?
hey pufnstuf! :wave:
okay everyone, please take this as me having my tongue-in-cheek, a wry smile and a little mischievous devil in my pocket:
So if my kid goes missing, and my husband dumps me like a hawt potato, no sex for me?
For how long, exactly?
What's the statute of limitations on comfort sex post-trauma?
hey pufnstuf! :wave:
okay everyone, please take this as me having my tongue-in-cheek, a wry smile and a little mischievous devil in my pocket:
So if my kid goes missing, and my husband dumps me like a hawt potato, no sex for me?
For how long, exactly?
What's the statute of limitations on comfort sex post-trauma?
But this thread isn't about all those things. It's about Terri sending pictures of herself with lurid graphic notions of sexual behavior. No child was nearby. She was an adult. She had been served divorce papers signaling to her that her husband no longer bound himself to her and has taken legal action to end their marriage.
What does an adult, making an adult decision to send text messages to another adult, regardless of how long they knew one another, have to do with her fitness to visit with her child?
Adults around the world send sext messages. These same adults have children. Many of these adults are in stressful situations in their lives. This doesn't make a person bad. It makes for tawdry discussion when it becomes public. But how does it make someone so unfit to see their children?
But this thread isn't about all those things. It's about Terri sending pictures of herself with lurid graphic notions of sexual behavior. No child was nearby. She was an adult. She had been served divorce papers signaling to her that her husband no longer bound himself to her and has taken legal action to end their marriage.
What does an adult, making an adult decision to send text messages to another adult, regardless of how long they knew one another, have to do with her fitness to visit with her child?
Adults around the world send sext messages. These same adults have children. Many of these adults are in stressful situations in their lives. This doesn't make a person bad. It makes for tawdry discussion when it becomes public. But how does it make someone so unfit to see their children?
OK... well, consulting my "Child Missing, Failed MFH of Dear Husband Appropriate Sex Guide for Dummies"...
My opinion? She started the sexting as soon as her husband moved out. And three weeks after Kyron had been missing.
Three weeks.
And her daughter had been taken, too.
Just me... and I usually despise anecdotes, but I think I'd be sickened with a sense of loss that I'd hardly be able to eat. Sex would be the furthest thing from my mind. I would be working myoff to remedy the problems.
I'm not a prude... not by a long shot. But this isn't about sex as much as it is about the sheer audaciousness of her behavior at a time when most of us would be mourning so many losses.
To me, the only thing that explains her cheerful, risque texts is that she killed Kyron and was almost giddy about it--therefore the almost manic texts.
It makes her look disgusting, like shes more worried about getting some ever again, instead of Kyron being missing. She looks like a truly uncaring person and I wouldnt want someone like her around my child knowing all we know about her, sexts aside.
jmo
It makes her look disgusting, like shes more worried about getting some ever again, instead of Kyron being missing. She looks like a truly uncaring person and I wouldnt want someone like her around my child knowing all we know about her, sexts aside.
jmo