Thought and theories on Jeremy

[hambirg]

i know i've seen it too... tried looking in the timeline and media thread but nada. tried google. nada. will try again after work tmrrw if not found yet...

:seeya:

Thanks, don't worry about it. I can look for it too. I have been, but haven't came up with it yet.

 

[Dr.Fessel]

I think so-I will need a little time to find it-if I don't get it tonight to you-I promise I'll get it to you tomorrow

He avoids and deflects and makes no sense and does not try to answer what they were asking him about when he called it quits. His answer made no sense at all.

 

[hambirg]

the part about how they didn't expect to be there that long... "neither had any idea..."

it's not a 100% guarantee but i think it's implied they were together?

Yeah, I would feel a lot better if it said, "I was there with JI the whole time, right up until we left at 3:30am."

We can all hope, no?

 

[hambirg]

He avoids and deflects and makes no sense and does not try to answer what they were asking him about when he called it quits. His answer made no sense at all.

Thanks, Doc. Didn't JI at one time talk about them asking about BL's paternity or something like that? I really don't remember exactly what it was, but I thought I remember him speaking to something like that.

 

[Dr.Fessel]

Thanks, Doc. Didn't JI at one time talk about them asking about BL's paternity or something like that? I really don't remember exactly what it was, but I thought I remember him speaking to something like that.

Dang, I just watched the video I think, and it was an nbc one and it had a thing to click on and the transcript folded down and you could read it. I looked in my past post and can't find it. Looking more.

 

[Dr.Fessel]

LAUER: You know, I have to say that unfortunately I have covered way too many of these cases over the years of missing children , abducted children , children who've gone missing for one reason or another and I have rarely seen the police come out and make a statement like the one they made yesterday, saying that the parents have stopped cooperating without having a reason to do so. So why do you think they've made this statement?

Mr. IRWIN: We were at the station yesterday being interviewed again and I just had reached my -- I just had reached my boiling point and I asked them, I said, 'Guys, I can't do this anymore today. I need a break. I can't answer any more questions.' Then we asked to leave and then the next thing we knew we -- was the press conference yesterday evening, so it was completely caught us by surprise.

LAUER: Well talk to -- the -- let's back up an hour -- let's back up an hour or so. What was the -- how would you describe the demeanor of the police prior to you saying you reached your breaking point or your boiling point? Was it an aggressive questioning? Was it -- was there cooperation prior to that point? How were they treating you? How were you responding to them?

Mr. IRWIN: Yesterday, the gentleman that was interviewing me was very nice and once I expressed to him several times that I wanted to leave he went ahead and let me go. The other day was a little bit different story. But we just -- we just want to make sure that we tell everybody that we're, you know, we're still cooperating, we're still talking to the police. We're doing everything we can to try to find Lisa and bring her back home.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/44813...issing-tot-cops-said-you-did-it/#.T0M1Z3orxXZ

 

[Dr.Fessel]

LAUER: Debbie ...

Ms. BRADLEY: Our number one focus is her...

LAUER: And, Debbie , what was -- what was the...

Ms. BRADLEY: ...above all else. No matter what, it's her.

LAUER: And I understand that. What was your experience with the police? What kind of questions were they asking you and what was the level of aggressiveness of those questions?

Ms. BRADLEY: They -- the same thing with Jeremy . They were -- they were really nice yesterday and -- but it wasn't like that the first time, and we understand that, we don't have any hard feelings. We're not -- we're not mad. We know that this is what they -- this is what they have to do, so we totally understand.

LAUER: But you say this is what they have to do. Do you feel that in some ways by making this statement publicly, calling you out in some ways publicly, they are trying to pit one of you against the other?

Ms. BRADLEY: Possibly.

Mr. IRWIN:

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/44813...issing-tot-cops-said-you-did-it/#.T0M1Z3orxXZ

 

[hambirg]

Here's another clip that shows DB saying that JI went in and found Lisa gone. . and then told her "she's not in her crib."

DB starts talking around the 2:00 mark

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vXBPr4w0g4&feature=related"]Police Launch New Search for Baby Lisa - Fox News Video - Fox News.flv - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Whisperer]

from a fb post i saw it seems his boss was with him the whole time?

i can't link the post but google "all current electric kansas city starbucks" and look at the cached post

How convenient for Jeremy..hmm

I don't do facebook. Who was this person who wrote that? I would assume the licensed contractor would have to be on the job. So it took two of them to do a four hour job which took ten hours. I wonder if Starbucks ever called them back..

 

[vlpate]

Here it is with a Link..

Which phone did she call him on? I know I heard he borrowed the company phone that day.

Deborah is afraid to leave his side, yet she leaves her kids with neighbors and disappears? Afraid of what?

This was the first I'd heard this. They didn't call to check on their sons or anything the day after their daughter goes missing - starts at about 1:06:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wseVjGV0FR0"]Family has not heard from Lisa's parents - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Whisperer]

the part about how they didn't expect to be there that long... "neither had any idea..."

it's not a 100% guarantee but i think it's implied they were together?

Maybe the boss met him there and left. He may have to say he was there to Cover. I'm pretty sure Starbucks wouldn't like a journeyman working there for ten hours alone.

 

[Whisperer]

No electrician would be w/o a phone..NONE..ever!

My goodness, the company has one employee...Jeremy. It was probably his own phone. Electricians are never w/o their phones. They keep it on them throughout their job. I know we paid enough of them to observe their habits.

They also start charging you from when they leave their home...so hire one close by.

 

[vlpate]

No electrician would be w/o a phone..NONE..ever!

My goodness, the company has one employee...Jeremy. It was probably his own phone. Electricians are never w/o their phones. They keep it on them throughout their job. I know we paid enough of them to observe their habits.

They also start charging you from when they leave their home...so hire one close by.

If that's true, then their phones were not turned off at 5:15 that day.

 

[hambirg]

How convenient for Jeremy..hmm

I don't do facebook. Who was this person who wrote that? I would assume the licensed contractor would have to be on the job. So it took two of them to do a four hour job which took ten hours. I wonder if Starbucks ever called them back..

It rubs me the wrong way that the wife/owner says that she "knows" BL was there because she heard her in the background. Puhleeze! Ten month olds babble and that is about it. Why she can be so sure she heard BL idk. It's not like she answered the phone and said, "Hi, this is Lisa. Let me get my dad."

 

[Whisperer]

I remember Jesse G thinking he heard Caylee...too.

They have tried everything they can think of to place Lisa there by 4:30pm. Must be very important.

 

[Whisperer]

If that's true, then their phones were not turned off at 5:15 that day.

I am speculating that Jeremy has his own phone for work. He wouldn't hook it up with DB's. It is too important. It was working just fine all evening and that morning as he used it to call 911.

I'm also speculating that only one phone was cut off and that was DB's phone. She knew it was coming and borrowed Gramp's phone the night before. Ever notice the attorney spin addresses just one phone...only Deb's, never any other?

 

[Whisperer]

What we have here are four phones. Three phones missing; one with Jeremy. Deb's got shut off for non-payment. Was this attached to Jeremy's phone...I have no idea. He would be foolish to do it, imo. She is a chatterbox and would use up all the minutes or go over the limit every month. If you think he is bad about lights, I bet he is a demon on phone minutes.

 

[Whisperer]

Never did buy the speaker problem with db. That's what she told him but she was conning to get a phone for when hers was shut off.

...Yes, I am that cynical!

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

No electrician would be w/o a phone..NONE..ever!

My goodness, the company has one employee...Jeremy. It was probably his own phone. Electricians are never w/o their phones. They keep it on them throughout their job. I know we paid enough of them to observe their habits.

They also start charging you from when they leave their home...so hire one close by.

What is wrong with small business? Many businesses start out with no employees and work their way up one at a time. :waitasec:

 

[cityslick]

For those who had questions about Starbucks and who JI was working with, this is from the RR Q & A thread.

This has come up recently.

When JI worked that night at starbucks, do you know if he was the only one working or did he have coworkers with him? Was it ever confirmed (that you know of) that LE fully accounted for JI's whereabouts that night (he was working)? Thanks.

I'm told there was a coworker with him. I can only assume that LE totally pursued that.