Titanic tourist sub goes missing in Atlantic Ocean, June 2023 #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dr. Ballard/Woods Hole was the first with Alvin. to be fair Cameron was making a movie.

I can't find it now but I swear I read that Cameron used the retired Russian MIR submersibles in some form or fashion. I wonder how he got them and obviously that means he didn't start from scratch either... assuming the info is true.
 
Really? Why? Air travel is a necessity in modern life. Travelling to the depths of the ocean is a luxury that taxpayers need not fund IMO.
We know so little about the Earth's oceans, especially at great depths. Scientists studying marine ecology, plate tectonics, geothermal energy, earthquakes, and so much more would benefit greatly from being able to regularly travel all the way down to the seabed.

Aside from scientific enquiry, there are many other benefits to DSV's for both military and civilian uses. But really, all that is outside the scope of this thread. So I suggest we agree to disagree and not derail the discussion.
 
I recommend reading about Robert Ballard and how he discovered and filmed the Titanic and other ship wrecks, and the things that happened after his finding.
I recommend his Nat Geo. videos and books.
Thanks for the link !
Will go and look up the info.
 
Last edited:
I know he designed and built a submersible.


Here's an article from 2012

Mr Cameron has spent the past few years working in secret with his team of engineers to design and build the craft, which weighs 11 tonnes and is more than 7m (23ft) long.
He describes it as a "vertical torpedo" that slices through the water allowing him a speedy descent.




ETA: And, here's more info on his "Deep Sea Challenge"



And, I posted this video previously...

I never cease to be astounded by it, from a perspective of a study of decay. You have what was obviously a cabin, walls of steel swiss cheese, barely recognisable, and in the middle of the room, a wood and brass bed head, upright, gleaming as though it's just been polished, and opposite it, a small vanity with a smooth white marble or porcelain top and a perfectly intact front of wicker. After almost a hundred years.

One of the pictures that has remained in my brain for decades, though I can't find it online, was an unrecognisably twisted mess of metal from the debris field, and sat on top of it, upright, an intact teacup, as though someone had just placed it there and walked away.

It's the dissonance of intactness contrasted with terrible decay and destruction that I thinks makes the images so arresting. The randomness of what is still virtually the same and what is completely obliterated. The parallel between that and the randomness of who survived and who did not. It makes me hurt, deeply, for all those who never came home. Five more, now, who will be there, in some form, forever.

MOO
 
Thanks to everyone who has been answering my questions. It’s going to fast. Tons of interesting info. I have multiple tabs open to explore this whole area of deep sea exploration and submersibles.

And also those who have given us all so much technical info. Like @PrairieWind and @Interested_But_Confused, etc. I’ve learned so much and it’s helped to understand.
 
We know so little about the Earth's oceans, especially at great depths. Scientists studying marine ecology, plate tectonics, geothermal energy, earthquakes, and so much more would benefit greatly from being able to regularly travel all the way down to the seabed.

Aside from scientific enquiry, there are many other benefits to DSV's for both military and civilian uses. But really, all that is outside the scope of this thread. So I suggest we agree to disagree and not derail the discussion.

And, there are those marine sponges and other sea "life" that have been the source of human medications.

ETA: A link

 
“Crushed inwards”

Can you please elaborate, would that mean it’s contained?

The water rushed in quickly, likely cutting them to bits and crushing them.

The water would be so fast that their brains wouldn’t receive the signal to know what was happening as they died almost instantaneously.

They were in the ocean, contained to what?? The ocean.
 

"I feel disbelief," Azmeh said, speaking through sobs. "It's an unreal situation."

"I feel like I've been caught in a really bad film, with a countdown, but you didn't know what you're counting down to," she said. "I personally have found it kind of difficult to breathe thinking of them."

"I never thought I would have an issue with drawing breath," she added. "It's been unlike any experience I've ever had."

Azmeh and Shahzada are scions of one of the most prominent corporate dynasties in Pakistan. The family’s namesake business empire, Dawood Hercules Corp., has investments in agriculture, the health sector and other industries.

Shahzada was the vice chairman of the Karachi-based Engro Corporation and an adviser to Prince’s Trust International, a charitable organization founded by King Charles III.

In recent years, Azmeh had fallen out of touch with Shahzada.

She was diagnosed with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in 2014 and "reduced to being in a wheelchair." She and her husband decided to move from England to Amsterdam so she would have easier access to medicinal cannabis.
If she had fallen out of touch, I’m taking what she said with a grain of salt, about her nephew.
 
The water rushed in quickly, likely cutting them to bits and crushing them.

The water would be so fast that their brains wouldn’t receive the signal to know what was happening as they died almost instantaneously.

They were in the ocean, contained to what?? The ocean.
Isn't it more that the pressure from the outside basically popped the vessel, squeezing everything inside to fragments? An implosion is like an explosion but inwards. No rushing water really?

ETA: Kind of like this:
 
I'm guessing CEO Rush did not know any of this. And he fired the one guy who was trained in such matters (and who wanted NDT and different designs).

imo
You will like this article. Very in-depth on CEO Rush:
I am sure Rush full well knew exactly that the (always used in the industry) perfectly spherical pressure hull was superior to his "innovative" tubular shaped pressure hull. He knew because he developed the submersible design.

As Interested_But_Confused says in their very informative post:

Normally subs designed for this kind of depth use a perfectly spherical pressure hull. The sphere is inherently much stronger than other shapes because the force applies equally in all directions; there's no inherent weak spot. Spherical hulls have been used successfully on pretty much all previous deep sea vessels, and up to now none of them have had a catastrophic failure.

Rush's big thing was innovation. He complained that regulations interfered with innovation.
Rush hoped for an explosion in ocean tech innovation.

OceanGate made history: Titan became the first privately owned sub with a human aboard to dive that deep and beyond, finally reaching 4,000 meters, or about 13,000 feet—a little deeper than where the Titanic lies.

“Stockton is a real pioneer,” says Scott Parazynski, a 17-year NASA veteran, “It’s not easy to take a white sheet of paper, come up with a new submersible design, fund it, test it and mature it. It was an incredibly audacious thing to do.”

1687467598718.png

A rendering of OceanGate’s Titan submersible exploring the deck of the Titanic. OceanGate

The maker of the lost Titan submersible previously complained about strict passenger-vessel regulations, saying the industry was 'obscenely safe'​

  • CEO Stockton Rush said he understood the regulations but regretted their effect on innovation.
 
Last edited:
You will like this article. Very in-depth on CEO Rush:
I am sure Rush full well knew exactly that the (always used in the industry) perfectly spherical pressure hull was superior to his "innovative" tubular shaped pressure hull. He knew because he developed the submersible design.

As Interested_But_Confused says in their very informative post:

Normally subs designed for this kind of depth use a perfectly spherical pressure hull. The sphere is inherently much stronger than other shapes because the force applies equally in all directions; there's no inherent weak spot. Spherical hulls have been used successfully on pretty much all previous deep sea vessels, and up to now none of them have had a catastrophic failure.

Rush's big thing was innovation. He complained that regulations interfered with innovation.
Rush hoped for an explosion in ocean tech innovation.

OceanGate made history: Titan became the first privately owned sub with a human aboard to dive that deep and beyond, finally reaching 4,000 meters, or about 13,000 feet—a little deeper than where the Titanic lies.

“Stockton is a real pioneer,” says Scott Parazynski, a 17-year NASA veteran, “It’s not easy to take a white sheet of paper, come up with a new submersible design, fund it, test it and mature it. It was an incredibly audacious thing to do.”

View attachment 430546
A rendering of OceanGate’s Titan submersible exploring the deck of the Titanic. OceanGate

Thanks for that info. Question: What about the ones Cameron used? Weren’t they privately owned?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDG

June 22, 2023 12:23pm Updated
Wasn't there a distress signal just before contact was lost? I only hope the implosion occurred immediately after that distress signal.
Just devastating.
My heartfelt condolences to the families.
 
“Crushed inwards”

Can you please elaborate, would that mean it’s contained?

I apologize for being gruesome, but not so much "contained" as crushed into a blob of mush. If you've seen meat that has been put in a blender, that's about what you'd be left with. And after four days, I suspect aquatic life would already have consumed most of what was left.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
205
Guests online
525
Total visitors
730

Forum statistics

Threads
625,780
Messages
18,509,815
Members
240,842
Latest member
comric_ele
Back
Top