Defense is trying to implicate HW but objects when LE witness is asked if any interviewed witnesses ever saw EB and HW together. That's because nobody saw them together IMO which doesn't help what the defense wants the jury to believe. I think that question should have been allowed to be answered.State on re-direct, asks witness if, in all their interviews, if anyone saw HW with Evelyn.
Objection, sidebar. Objectoom, sustained.
Witness excused, subject to recall.
But the question was asked. It hangs in the air.Defense is trying to implicate HW but objects when LE witness is asked if any interviewed witnesses ever saw EB and HW together. That's because nobody saw them together IMO which doesn't help what the defense wants the jury to believe. I think that question should have been allowed to be answered.
AgreedMOO
If that's their defense, tin foil hats, the jury won't deliberate past lunch.
MOO
In the court tv it doesn't look as though MB has washed her hair recently. Looks like dandruff as well. Yuk.But the question was asked. It hangs in the air.
Nobody else had access to Evelyn in that trailer. He'll, no one else would go in that trailer.
You can take the trash out of the trailer....In the court tv it doesn't look as though MB has washed her hair recently. Looks like dandruff as well. Yuk.
I am so very sorry, Megnut. My condolences.MOO
Accidentally death of any kind is out for me. SHE THREW HER IN THE TRASH. No burial, no swaddled in a blanket.
This hurts. I just had to bury my own (adult) daughter. I buried her with her baby doll and baby blanket... because she'll always be my baby.
Evelyn mattered. And MB wrapped her in tinfoil like spoiled leftovers from the back corner of a forgotten fridge. Vile. It reveals her motive as far as I'm concerned. She trashed her life, then she threw it all away, thinking she would just stay another.
A baby. Who didn't even have all of her baby teeth yet. Who does that to a BABY?????
MOO