(Head hasn't stopped spinning since the "camo cousin" apparent revelation.)
The cousin must be like an understudy.
In case the original mistaken person decides he no longer wants to be a part of the play.
If he really thought it was a cousin, why not name them?
Why not say, I thought it was my cousin, "LeRoy Jenkins" come over to show Holly the turkey?
Why was Drew Scott named several times, as "the bf who was mistaken", but a cousin, can be he who remains nameless?
ETA:
I realized I probably should rephrase that to the original mistaken person NEVER wanted to be a part of the play.
No one has ever seen him in person since this case began, except for 'locals'.
Not at the first vigil, not at the last.
His name was used in three separate contexts, as was his image. Then to add insult to injury, with Clint's name as a caption!
For the entire nearly three months the family chose to make no public statements about their, um, supposed/alleged abducted daughter, Drew Scott's photo was used as a proxy for Clint.
OK, I am ranted out about this case.
But, I still resent the cynical way that the public
has been treated regarding the shifting 'facts' of this case.
Time was, in the beginning, that the neighbor's son heard the scream.
Now it's the Mom only. I suppose DS is not the only person who decided
they'd rather not have a starring role in this play.