The information is taken by the responding officers, verbally. I have never seen a witness sitting at the scene of a crime writing a report. I suspect there is more to the story and there was a very good reason why he was seated there. The typed report is gathered later in the investigation...with help from the officers on how to write it. They generally have to help write it for the witness due to the witness not being savvy writing these types of things. I sure would love to see his first writing. They need to get things in an orderly fashion. Many witnesses are all over the place and don't give a clear sense of what exactly was going on.
I live in a smallish town in Texas, and you wouldn't believe how local LE operates. The couple of times my oldest daughter has filed reports, the cop wrote everything at her desk, pecking slowly away with one finger. My daughter asked if she could help, but was told no, because the cop Had to do it. From our dealings with our local LE, (because of an assault case between my daughter and her bf), they insisted that we Not have any contact with the bf or his family. One day I was sitting here, and thought, 'what the heck?' Not to go against cops, but I'm a grown woman and can decide for myself who I want to talk to, so I called the bf's mother. Anyway, the information I got from her, helped get my daughter's charges thrown out. If I hadn't called her, I doubt I would have found out, because the city cops sure didn't tell us. So, I understand why LE in Holly's case, doesn't share much information...they are building a case and don't want a lot of outside interference, but that outside information might help solve this case. This LE has kept just about Everything from the public and family, but at the same time, they ask for tips. Wouldn't it make more sense for them to share more of what they Do know, (not everything obviously), so a person in the general public would have an idea if some little thing he saw or heard, was important? IDK, but it's disheartening to see that after so long, this case doesn't seem to have moved forward. There was an eyewitness and IMO, he seems credible. His story may seem a little wishy washy, but it's not like he was mentally prepared for his sister to be kidnapped, so he wasn't at his sharpest. IMO, the people closest to this case, just didn't have the time to accomplish what was done... the time frame from Holly being on the phone with her friends, to the time cops got there, is a very small window of time, and everybody close to Holly, seems to be accounted for. IMO, the focus should be on neighbors and Holly's fringe associates...in other words, maybe a friend or relative of one of the neighbors. Somebody who visited the area and had contact, but maybe slipped under the radar. Or maybe a casual friend of the bf's, maybe a brother or uncle of somebody he knew. And this is what seems logical to me...if somebody close to Holly threatened her with a knife or other weapon, her reaction probably would have been less 'compliant' oriented. IMO, it looks like the abductor was somebody out of her comfort zone, somebody whose 'strangerness', had the power to freeze her and make her follow orders? IMO, when somebody close starts violence, the victim usually feels 'comfortable' enough to fight, argue, scream, try to run, etc. IMO, this seems like a case of a young girl being caught completely off guard and ambushed, done by someone she either didn't know at all, or barely knew. moo