You are correct. So far the slashing tires incident has not come out. Neither has the bizarre email (psychopathic) she sent to TA's date. Neither has her handstand, her talking to herself about make-up, her side of text messages when he called her a three hole wonder or when he said he felt like a dildo with a heart-beat. That is justice in America. On the flip side, she can kill him and then claim that he was a pedophile without a shred of evidence.
Sad, but true.
moo
Are you sure? I thought it did come out with MImi Hall? The note and the tire slashing?
I only saw snips of her testimony. I know HLN has everyone's testimony so i may go back and check.
Im soooooooooooo SICK of this prosecuter and this whole case actually ..This guy is gonna have a retirement home right beside the Casey Anthony prosecuters house when this is over . There's no dought she did it but it's the prosecuter's blowing all these cases . The defense isn't winning it for her thier just staying quiet and letting this moron rammble on forever and ever im tellin ya right now he's blowen this case . There will be fist fight's in the dam jury room.This trial and prosecuter is a JOKE....
Most of the attorneys on here (like me!) give him high grades. We can kind of tell what effective litigation looks like. He's made some mistakes here and there but I give him a 9.5 out of 10. I really think this guys is excellent.
I think sometimes it's hard when watching a real trial to be able to determine whether a case is going well or not. That's because real trials can be very tedious and boring.
See, JM knows all the elements he needs to prove and/or disprove and has to account for any potential wild card on the jury box who may grab at something a defense witness said. So, JM must thoroughly address everything said that could possibly sway even one juror, even when it seems it is understood. That's because while most may have gotten the point, one or two might not have. JM has to make sure that potential issues of every juror is addressed.
ETA: On t.v. the cases are neatly presented and wrapped up within an hour. In real life it is a boring exercise of laboring through each element of the crime or defense.
P.S.. When you look at cases like casey anthony's and OJ's, those are gross anomalies that, when averaged with the vast volume of murder cases tried every day in this country, just cannot be used as a barometer for what reasonably could be possible here.
Further, there has been such a volcano of evidence against jodi, much of it presented during the defense's own presentation, that IMO, the only bad result we can have here is a hung jury and that will only happen if there's a mentally ill or intellectually disabled juror.
So it's only wrong if people are offended? If it's ok to insult appearances for one witness, why is not ok for all? Seems like overweight or bald people could be offended by the comments about Samuels.
All I can say is that I am so happy I was not here to hear sexual orientation or feminazi insults. It would shape the way I view posters who I now adore!!!!!
But I don;t like any of the insults about witnesses or attorneys' appearance, either, unless it is absolutely germane, like they are wearing something grossly inappropriate or are wearing things or having certain hairstyles to do some4thing (like jodi hiding her face or trying to appear like a little girl or sociopathically emulating her attorney since she has no personality of her own).
Haircuts or suit choices or sock choices or Numri;s weight or junk adjustments, have nothing to do with this case and how well anyone is doing.
It's a very long trial. Not everyone is going to get everything right all the time. And not every last thing about every last person testifying or litigating for the defense is evil or ugly, simply because they are on the wrong side.
That's a cheap way to avoid actual, intelligent criticisms, IMO!!!!
