trial day 47: the defense continues its case in chief #142

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,861
And.......so what?????
 
  • #1,862
That's IT? OMG
 
  • #1,863
Omg that's it? Seriously?
 
  • #1,864
Where's the beef?
 
  • #1,865
So where was this intimidation? ???

Have I suddenly developed selective hearing

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
 
  • #1,866
Nurmi was planning for a mistrial from the get-go. Did you hear him say, "I'm glad this is on tape."? Juan is just straight questioning Samuels, an obstinate witness. Juan did nothing wrong.
 
  • #1,867
red.gif
Oops. Open mouth, insert foot (maybe keyboard, in this case). I posted before reading that he was in fact, an expert. I don't see how this testimony will help, either. It certainly indicates how desperate they are, that's for sure.
ohmygod.gif

Love your doggie! Is she a schnauzer? My DH's family is from San Antonio.
 
  • #1,868
For God's Sake really?????????

What was the big deal??????????
 
  • #1,869
That's it???.?.....that's all they have?

Time wasters ......sheeeesh.....
 
  • #1,870
I am as confused as ever right now.

Makes NO SENSE to me!
 
  • #1,871
The Judge is trying very hard to not roll her eyes....way to ruin her chipper mood DT

"And that proved what exactly, mr Nurmi??"
 
  • #1,872
LOL I'm so embarrassed for them. They are really reaching! That was pathetic!:floorlaugh:
 
  • #1,873
Please excuse my ignorance but what are the benefits of a mistrail?
I guess there is a new trial? If yes, does JA stay in jail or can she be
released until the new trial??
 
  • #1,874
OMG I can't believe Nurmi really believes that is witness intimidation.

If someone raises their voice at absurdity it could be a mistrial according to Nurmi.
 
  • #1,875
Is there where Judge Stevens says "I can.not.believe.you.guys.are.doing.this? I will..."

Hope so.
 
  • #1,876
SOOOOO Juan doing his job with a defiant witness and Wilmont interupting, um I didn't see anything wrong with that interview IMO
 
  • #1,877
So Nurmi and Willmott were present during the interview?

Oh goodness... this is so ridiculous.
 
  • #1,878
Really...that's all there is. Give me a break
 
  • #1,879
Oh. "Here we go"... into absolutely nowhere. How on earth is that tape proof of intimidation of a witness? Other than Samuels was actually challenged and questioned?
 
  • #1,880
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
107
Guests online
2,569
Total visitors
2,676

Forum statistics

Threads
632,093
Messages
18,621,915
Members
243,018
Latest member
MissLibra
Back
Top