That's the exact story I heard as well. I think they have broke plenty of protocol and frankly, it's truly upsetting. I may not have the experience to back me but I'm telling you from my point of view and everything I have learned in school (again, freshly graduated w/my bachelors degree in criminal justice with a concentration in criminal investigations) the way this case was handled from the very beginning was awful. I do agree with DPD stepping back from the case due to it being one of thier employees but in reality, did they really? And when they did step in, it made it worse, in my opinion. I understand that this is open investigation and they can't release much information but personally, the information they put out was to make it seem like this was a mistake and that she's not the bad one. Think about it. The information we have received about this case, is her warrant affidavit explaining the situation - which the more I look at it, the more it makes it seem like it's written to protect her. Statements like "both apartments are nearly identical" and that she gave him "verbal" commands which I understand is information that's has to be in there but it rubs me the wrong way. The next piece of information was the search warrant which contradicted the first statement but wouldn't you know, they released the search warrant to the public which stated the marijuana that was found. And the last piece of information we got was a beautiful video that had her wiping her eyes and looking sad at the jailhouse. Why in the hell do we want to see that, it has nothing to do with nothing. They just want her to come off as a innocent little angel who made a huge mistake. But I'm not buying it. Why is so much of the information contradicting its self? I'm telling you, where is the 911 tape that we usually hear? They realease it in other places all the time before trial. Surely if you tell me how it all went down in affidavit, then why can't we hear the 911 call? I'll tell you why. They are giving the public enough information to some what satisfy the needs of transparency. There's a reason we haven't heard it. I can almost bet.