I received a, uh, terse response from the case manager at Identifyus. Here is a copy paste:
"Any exclusions do appear on the Case Information page that comes up when you access a case. For #4640 there are none which is why you don't see any."
Now I thought our Jane Doe was 4630, which was the case number I referenced. I am going to assume the CM fat fingered his response....either that or I am insane.
Mia, you have put an incredible amount of time into this case: I am going to leave it up to you to decide if you want me to contact LE for the list of rule outs (even though the case file IIRC is not readily available) or if you would like to. Because we can go through this thread alone and come up with a couple...or perhaps some are going to have to run again???
First you are correct the Namus case number i have for her is also 4630...
I planned to contact LE in WC, Early next week. I have learned from speaking to them, that after a long weekend it is hard to reach them, they are busy catching up form the weekend. Also some of them maybe off today even as it is a State holiday. I guess you tell me, if we both contact them is that overload?? I will say out of the two invest. involved(both seem very dedicated) but perkins is the one that said when the file is located would give me the rule out info.
Also just to run this by one and all.. for anyone intrested, I think it would be a good idea to get a letter/email campaign going to the news networks nationally, and locally(in Walker County and Part Aransas area) to maybe get her face back in the media. I have a list of the contact info if anyone is intrested IM me(am I allowed to say that?? if not I will remove)
I have not yet got the newest drawing up of her on her website. I will ASAP. Right now I am watching the trial of the husband that killed his wife in Waco Tx, I went to school with the wife. Going to upload the new pic to her site, then back to the trial.