TX - Moriah Wilson, 25, Cyclist Fatally Shot Before Race, Austin, 2022 *arrest* #6

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #361

WATCH: Defense delivers opening statements in Kaitlin Armstrong murder trial​

Watching the defense's opening statement, I have a question for any attorneys (or anyone else who cares to weigh in).

The state must have objected eight or ten times because the defense was talking about reasonable doubt, the burden of proof and how the jury will need to weigh evidence. For the most part, the judge sustained saying that the defense needed to only talk about what the evidence will show.

I was kind of surprised because I never realized that those would be verboten topics during opening statements. Is that something specific to Texas or is that true in every jurisdiction?
 
  • #362
That’s what I was thinking - call came from KA.

The other possibility I considered was that CS simply called Mo to thank her for spending the day. Or…. He checked his texts and something in texts from KA made him nervous, and he called Mo to warn her.
The one thing I see in CS’s favor in all this, and I truly do mean the one thing, is that he dropped her off at 8:30 and didn’t stay (granted he was texting his cover story to his girlfriend, but he didn’t stay) - the fact that he didn’t stay is the only reason I believe it was romantic in 2021 but platonic by 2022.
 
  • #363

The police report said an anonymous caller had contacted Austin Police Department on May 14, saying: "Just discovered Strickland was having a romantic relationship with Wilson." The report also stated "Armstrong told the caller Armstrong was so angry Armstrong wanted to kill Wilson".

( forgot about this..if true, I hope anonymous is testifying ) JMO
 
  • #364

The police report said an anonymous caller had contacted Austin Police Department on May 14, saying: "Just discovered Strickland was having a romantic relationship with Wilson." The report also stated "Armstrong told the caller Armstrong was so angry Armstrong wanted to kill Wilson".

( forgot about this..if true, I hope anonymous is testifying ) JMO
JC is on the witness list.

Armstrong confided to Chasteen that she’d recently gotten a gun. This, anyway, is what Chasteen thought she heard. It was loud inside the café. They’d had a couple of drinks. She definitely heard Armstrong say something about a gun, either that she’d bought one or was about to.

At the time, the gravity of Armstrong’s remarks didn’t quite register. Everyone knew her as a caring, compassionate person, full of light and talent, not so different from Wilson. Nobody believed Armstrong could ever hurt someone.

Later, when Chasteen’s husband, Andy, told her about Wilson’s murder, she nearly broke down in tears. “It was Kaitlin!” she told him. She phoned in an anonymous tip to the police, which helped them obtain an arrest warrant.

 
  • #365
The judge in Armstrong's trial is not allowing the bulk of the proceedings to be streamed. However, KVUE will be in the courtroom each day, and we will provide updates on air and online.

This trial is expected to last as long as mid-November.
KVUE on social media: Facebook | X | Instagram | YouTube
Mid November! Just in time for KA’s November 21st bday gift - a guilty verdict!
 
  • #366
Watching the defense's opening statement, I have a question for any attorneys (or anyone else who cares to weigh in).

The state must have objected eight or ten times because the defense was talking about reasonable doubt, the burden of proof and how the jury will need to weigh evidence. For the most part, the judge sustained saying that the defense needed to only talk about what the evidence will show.

I was kind of surprised because I never realized that those would be verboten topics during opening statements. Is that something specific to Texas or is that true in every jurisdiction?
IANAL but here’s what I found from the American Bar Association —

The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements must be confined to facts that will be proved by the evidence, and cannot be argumentative.


The “statements” made by the defense were argumentative in nature — there was a lot of talk about the jury’s doubts and opinions and conclusions. Talk that is really only appropriate during the closing argument. Instead, he should have pointed out things the jury can expect to hear from their witnesses. For example, instead of arguing that the prosecution’s witnesses are worthless and ballistics evidence isn’t real and DNA results aren’t 100% accurate… he should have said you’ll hear from our firearm expert who will tell you all the reasons why the state’s ballistic evidence can’t be trusted and you’ll hear from an experienced crime scene investigator who will tell you all the ways the evidence was mishandled and you’ll hear about Kaitlin’s tragic past from her sister, and all of these things will convince you that our client is not guilty.
 
  • #367
^^bbm

KA's defense couldn't wait to throw out that the victim was named or linked to a family disturbance. Well a family disturbance doesn't explain the psycho, disgruntled gf stalking a young woman that the defendant's cad of a boyfriend had designs on. :rolleyes:

Is that the best the defense has got? Pfft...
This “family disturbance” thing is weird. MW did not even live in TX, as far as has come out she was just there in fall 2021 briefly and spent time with CS and then had just returned a day before the murder to prepare for a cycling event. So why would Austin PD be saying they had her linked to a family disturbance?
 
  • #368
Can anyone refesh me: Were bullet casings found at the scene of the murder? If yes, were Armstrong's DNA/prints found on them?
 
  • #369
Can anyone refesh me: Were bullet casings found at the scene of the murder? If yes, were Armstrong's DNA/prints found on them?
Bullet casings were found at the scene. They have not mentioned that dna/prints were found on them, but they did link the ballistics to the gun Colin bought Kaitlin.
 
  • #370
IANAL but here’s what I found from the American Bar Association —

The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements must be confined to facts that will be proved by the evidence, and cannot be argumentative.


The “statements” made by the defense were argumentative in nature — there was a lot of talk about the jury’s doubts and opinions and conclusions. Talk that is really only appropriate during the closing argument. Instead, he should have pointed out things the jury can expect to hear from their witnesses. For example, instead of arguing that the prosecution’s witnesses are worthless and ballistics evidence isn’t real and DNA results aren’t 100% accurate… he should have said you’ll hear from our firearm expert who will tell you all the reasons why the state’s ballistic evidence can’t be trusted and you’ll hear from an experienced crime scene investigator who will tell you all the ways the evidence was mishandled and you’ll hear about Kaitlin’s tragic past from her sister, and all of these things will convince you that our client is not guilty.

Thanks. That makes sense.
 
  • #371
Can anyone refesh me: Were bullet casings found at the scene of the murder? If yes, were Armstrong's DNA/prints found on them?

On NewsNation tonight they said KA dna was found on Mo’s bike. I haven’t had a chance to see if it’s reported anywhere else.
 
  • #372
Watching the defense's opening statement, I have a question for any attorneys (or anyone else who cares to weigh in).

The state must have objected eight or ten times because the defense was talking about reasonable doubt, the burden of proof and how the jury will need to weigh evidence. For the most part, the judge sustained saying that the defense needed to only talk about what the evidence will show.

I was kind of surprised because I never realized that those would be verboten topics during opening statements. Is that something specific to Texas or is that true in every jurisdiction?

In my experience, it's quite unusual to hear so many objections during "Opening Statements." However, when Asst. DA Jones continued to object citing the defense was not providing a 'road map,' and the Court was sustaining the objections, I remembered that Texas seems to take their Opening Remarks (as they like to say) very seriously!

I referenced the TEXAS DISTRICT & COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION to see if they cite anything different about Texas procedure and after noting what is expected in an opening statement pursuant to TX Code of Criminal Procedure, sure enough, there it was, "provide a road map" that DA Jones kept using his in objection.

The suggested outline for the Opening Statement includes the following: Also, interesting rule in Endnotes [3] at the link:

What the law says

Provide a roadmap

Tell a story

Keep it simple

Conclusion

 
  • #373

11/1/23

Prosecutors today described how Texas yoga teacher Kaitlin Armstrong stood over her love rival Moriah 'Mo' Wilson and shot her 'in the heart' in explosive opening statements to kick off her murder trial.

Armstrong, 36, appeared in court in a navy jacket with her auburn hair curled. She appeared to have returned to her natural hair color after dying it a darker shade and undergoing plastic surgery while on the run.

She is accused of murdering Wilson in cold blood, shooting her three times, in May 2022, after learning that she was texting her boyfriend, Colin Strickland.

How do they know that KA was standing over MW? Bullet projection?
 
  • #374
Can anyone refesh me: Were bullet casings found at the scene of the murder? If yes, were Armstrong's DNA/prints found on them?
From the AA dated 5/19/22:

Officers observed multiple fired cartridge cases on the floor near Wilson but a firearm was not immediately observed. Wilson was pronounced deceased at 10:10 PM by Dr. Escott.

There was no mention of DNA collected, tested, and/or the results.
 
  • #375

Day one of the Kaitlin Armstrong murder trial wraps up​

by: Brianna Hollis
Posted: Nov 1, 2023 / 08:31 AM CDT
Updated: Nov 1, 2023 / 05:26 PM CDT

AUSTIN (KXAN) — The murder trial for Kaitlin Armstrong began Wednesday at 9 a.m. Armstrong is accused of shooting and killing up-and-coming professional cyclist Anna Moriah “Mo” Wilson in May 2022.

Cameras are allowed inside the courtroom only for opening statements, closing arguments and the verdict, but not during witness testimony.

Even though cameras are not allowed inside during testimony, KXAN’s Brianna Hollis will be inside the courtroom and will update this story throughout the trial with the latest information. Follow her live on social media below.


State focuses on phone records in opening statements​

Assistant District Attorney Rickey Jones began his opening statements by saying a few things about Wilson and her athletic endeavors, mentioning her collegiate skiing career and her recent success as a professional gravel racer.

While making his case, he presented slides detailing a timeline — gathered through phone records — of Armstrong and Wilson’s actions in the months leading up to the murder, as well as the actions of Colin Strickland, Armstrong’s then-off-and-on boyfriend.

Prosecutors said Armstrong and Strickland were business partners and she had access to his messages through their laptop and iPad. Jones said Strickland and Wilson had a brief romantic relationship. It’s important to note that Wilson’s family previously sent KXAN the following statement about Wilson’s relationship status.

“While we will not elaborate about the ongoing investigation, we do feel it’s important to clarify that at the time of her death, those closest to her clearly understood, directly from Moriah, that she was not in a romantic relationship with anyone,” the family wrote in the statement.

Jones, in his statements, outlined the below timeline on the day Wilson died, which he said prosecutors and law enforcement gathered through phone records. Wilson was in town for a gravel race and was staying with a friend in east Austin.

  • Wilson and Strickland leave Deep Eddy Pool. State said Strickland lied to Armstrong about where he was.
  • 8:35 p.m.: Strickland drops Wilson off at her friend’s east Austin apartment
  • 8:38 p.m.: Strickland texts Armstrong, goes home.
  • 9:13 p.m.: Wilson uses her phone.
  • 9:15 p.m.: Gunshots go off.

Defense: No video shows Armstrong shooting Wilson​

“I want to talk to you about what you didn’t hear about,” said defense attorney Geoffrey Puryear. “Not one witness saw Kaitlin Armstrong allegedly commit this murder. Because there isn’t one.”

The defense’s primary argument appears to be the notion of while there is surveillance of gunshots and her Jeep, there is no camera footage of Armstrong actually shooting Wilson.

“You won’t hear about any camera footage of Armstrong being there,” Puryear said.

The defense reminded the jury the burden of proof is on the State to prove Armstrong is guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

The defense concluded opening statements within about 15 minutes. The State spoke for about one hour.

Below are both sides’ opening statements in full. (See MSM link).

Wilson’s brother, friend testify before lunch break​

Matt Wilson, Mo’s brother, was the first to take the stand.

The state asked about his sister’s collegiate skiing career as well as her up-and-coming professional cycling endeavors. He also spoke to the kind of person his sister was, saying they were both extremely close.

Matt said Wilson and Strickland did not have a romantic relationship at the time of Wilson’s death, but did previously have a casual dating relationship the previous year.

Caitlin Cash, the friend Mo Wilson stayed with when she visited Austin in May, said the same thing about Wilson and Strickland’s relationship.

During Cash’s testimony, prosecutors asked her about the night Wilson died. Cash said she found Wilson on the floor of her apartment bathroom the night of May 11 covered in blood.

The State played Cash’s 911 call to police. Cash cried on the stand as the audio played.

Responding officers, medics testify in afternoon​

Martin Salinas, a former Austin police officer, took the stand when the trial resumed after the lunch break.

He said he had been with APD for a few months when he responded to the east Austin home where Wilson was killed. A field training officer was with him. Salinas is no longer with APD.

The State played body camera video from the police response. You could see Cash performing CPR on Wilson when officers first arrived, and then the officers took over.

Salinas noted that he saw shell casings on the floor near Wilson’s body. He also said the police department ran information on Strickland, because Cash had mentioned Wilson was with him prior to coming back to Cash’s apartment. Other testifying officers addressed that as well.

APD Officer Nathan Taylor, who also responded that day, addressed the condition Wilson was in when he arrived. When defense attorneys questioned him, they established the important of preserving evidence at crime scenes.

In further testimony, another officer – a 28-year veteran with APD, Officer Lopez – addressed the whereabouts of Wilson’s bike, which Cash indicated was missing, saying it should have either been right inside the door or in the black bike bag outside. Defense attorneys asked her about the importance of not contaminating evidence on the scene.

Throughout first responder testimony, defense attorneys frequently brought up the concept of preserving and/or contaminating evidence, with particular focus on Wilson’s bike.

History of the case​

On May 11, 2022, Austin police found Wilson with a gunshot wound at an east Austin home. She ultimately died at the scene. Wilson, originally from Vermont, was in town for a race in Texas.

‘They must be devastated’: Expert asks public to consider victim’s family while following Armstrong case
Police said Armstrong’s Jeep was in the area of the home where authorities found Wilson dead around the time of the shooting. On May 14, surveillance video captured Armstrong at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport. On May 17, APD issued a murder warrant for Amstrong.

She eventually made her way to Costa Rica, where U.S. Marshals found and arrested her on June 30, 2022. Police said she cut and dyed her hair and had a bandage on her nose and bruised eyes.

On Oct. 11, the Travis County Sheriff’s Office said Armstrong tried to escape custody after a doctor’s appointment in south Austin. She ran from corrections officers, who caught up to her in about 10 minutes.

There is currently a gag order on the case, so no one involved can speak about it until the trial is over.
 
  • #376
How do they know that KA was standing over MW? Bullet projection?
I swear I saw something awhile ago referencing that the bathroom floor tile was chipped or broken? Maybe indicating that the bullet traveled down trajectory?

ETA- found it in the article below:

On the evening of May 11, police found Wilson dead on a bathroom floorwith at least three bullet wounds, two to the head and a third to her chest that allegedly occurred "after she was already laying supine on the floor." She had an exit wound on her back, and police found a bullet and chipped tile beneath her.

Wilson had lacerations on her right finger and under her chin, according to the warrant. Police found shell casings labeled "9mm JAG" in the room.

 
  • #377
  • #378
How do they know that KA was standing over MW? Bullet projection?
If the ME doesn't disclose this when they give evidence, then I think it might be creative liberty by DA Jones as I see this was part of his opening statement (and where he also gestured with his hands on his body for the gunshot wounds).


11/1/23

“The last thing Mo did on this earth was scream in terror,” Travis County prosecutor Rickey Jones told jurors in opening statements.

He said nearby surveillance equipment captured the screams.

“Those screams are followed by ‘Pop! Pop!’” Jones said, punching his fist into his hand for emphasis. “You won’t hear any more screams after that.”

Seconds after those shots, Jones said, “Kaitlin Armstrong stood over Mo Wilson and put a third shot right into Mo Wilson’s heart.”


In a short opening statement, defense attorney Geoffrey Puryear said Armstrong was caught in a “web of circumstantial evidence.”

No video evidence or witnesses can put Armstrong at the scene of the shooting, Puryear said.

[..]

Prosecutors said they will show that Armstrong tracked Strickland’s communications with Wilson — as well as Wilson’s whereabouts — in the weeks and days before the shooting. Armstrong was able to track Wilson’s location because Wilson had not turned on a safety feature on a phone app.

[..]

Investigators quickly cleared Strickland. Prosecutors said Wednesday that video and cellphone calls, texting, and location data will confirm that he was nowhere near the shooting.
 
  • #379

Kaitlin Armstrong murder trial: Attorneys analyze, break down opening statements​

 
  • #380
JC is on the witness list.

Armstrong confided to Chasteen that she’d recently gotten a gun. This, anyway, is what Chasteen thought she heard. It was loud inside the café. They’d had a couple of drinks. She definitely heard Armstrong say something about a gun, either that she’d bought one or was about to.

At the time, the gravity of Armstrong’s remarks didn’t quite register. Everyone knew her as a caring, compassionate person, full of light and talent, not so different from Wilson. Nobody believed Armstrong could ever hurt someone.

Later, when Chasteen’s husband, Andy, told her about Wilson’s murder, she nearly broke down in tears. “It was Kaitlin!” she told him. She phoned in an anonymous tip to the police, which helped them obtain an arrest warrant.

^Replying to my own post as a correction. There were TWO reported anonymous callers. JC is one. Unsure who the other one is and whether or not they are on the witness list.

Two people claiming to know Armstrong and her live-in-boyfriend at the time, Colin Strickland – a professional cyclist who had an “on again, off again relationship” with Wilson, according to detectives – called the Austin Police Department after Wilson’s death to help with the investigation.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
63
Guests online
2,404
Total visitors
2,467

Forum statistics

Threads
633,146
Messages
18,636,381
Members
243,412
Latest member
9hf6u
Back
Top