.
Quote RSBM. What do you mean? (By the last two sentences?)
(BTW, I could not find sUitable RSBM on the abbreviation list. For my own education, what does it stand for? Thank you).
About that Sig Sauer gun. A couple of threads before, people were wondering how KA did not get rid of the gun on her way back home. Because much as a disappeared gun is not a great thing, the shells from the crime scene matching your gun lying in a box, in your house, are a serious clue.
My explanation- she thought that LE won’t connect her to the crime, but CS might.
JMO . I think that KA thought over crime, that it was not spontaneous. Technically speaking, in this case, it is important not to leave the clues for the LE. The action when you return the gun back is meant is meant to not arise suspicion in your partner when in the morning he wakes up and hears (for sure, early, from the cycling community) that MW has been killed.
What reaction from him KA expected from CS? Probably, some emotional one, fear, anger, loss.
What reaction did the police get from him, IRL, initially? Very logical. From the affidavit, it would seem that his goal is to minimize own connection with MW. Now, not for a second do I suspect CS in the crime. What I see, though, is CS simply thinking of himself, his reputation. Mo becomes “some woman”, KA is the most nonviolent person by him. At the time when he got to know about Mo being killed, in the morning, he ought to have connected some dots in his head, he has been in this situation between Mo and KA for a while. And KA wasn’t at home when he returned. But CS is seemingly concerned about another thing, negative PR should the link between him and MW, or his GF and MW get known.
And now I think, of the two, KA has friends, is, per all accounts, social, has lived with CS for three years. Why misjudge her partner so much? How well does she understand people, their acts and connections? How come she didn’t foresee that his reaction would be strictly that of preserving his own name and his business?
