Connor GilliesVerified account @ConnorGillies
Prosecution asks accused if he is a “confident liar”. He says no. Boy admits he lied to police in his initial
With confidence ...the police officer claims
Connor GilliesVerified account @ConnorGillies
Prosecution asks accused if he is a “confident liar”. He says no. Boy admits he lied to police in his initial
With confidence ...the police officer claims
Connor GilliesVerified account @ConnorGillies
Boy appears to screw his nose up over confusion at a question from the prosecution. Iain McSporran QC says “not the last you’ll hear from me”.
Small community, pretty sure the other person would be clamouring to say it was them to help the case.I live directly across from Bute. It may be odd but it isn't completely impossible, particularly given it was mid-summer. The point i'm making is that we do not know exactly who or what it is in that CCTV.
We aren't privy to how it's being worded in court, but as I'm reading it, I think it's still unclear what they mean by inside the house. I would not classify that stairwell, even if it's single use as being inside their house.Only going to say it one more time the palm print was found in the internal home only used by the MacPhail family. Earlier we debated if the accused could of left it on a previous visit due to RM not being entirely sure if the accused had been inside his home but the accused has just admitted he was never in the house, well he was certainly never ‘invited’ in that’s for sure.
Still innocent in your eyes?
No murderer would ever get convicted if we thought like this. It’s “beyond a reasonable doubt” because of course sometimes it can’t be proven because it’s not all filmed on cctv and it isn’t a easy clean and cut case. You have to draw The line somewhere. The evidence is overwhelming I can’t believe you are still unconvinced!Exactly - 'described as', not proven given the image quality is so poor. It may well be Alesha's legs, but they cannot prove it, the same as they cannot prove the person on the shore carrying whatever it is, is the accused.
Connor GilliesVerified account @ConnorGillies
Boy appears to screw his nose up over confusion at a question from the prosecution. Iain McSporran QC says “not the last you’ll hear from me”.
We aren't privy to how it's being worded in court, but as I'm reading it, I think it's still unclear what they mean by inside the house. I would not classify that stairwell, even if it's single use as being inside their house.
Connor GilliesVerified account @ConnorGillies
Boy appears to screw his nose up over confusion at a question from the prosecution. Iain McSporran QC says “not the last you’ll hear from me”.
I live directly across from Bute. It may be odd but it isn't completely impossible, particularly given it was mid-summer. The point i'm making is that we do not know exactly who or what it is in that CCTV.
In a retirement/sheltered accommodation block yes, I haven't heard anything about this being one?You wouldnt normalled find a chair lift in a communal stair well though would you? I mean you might but the odds are small.
And probably she didn’t. It was just something to keep an open mind.I don't think TM helped him at all.
It's not communal, I accept that, but having lived in similar accommodation in the UK, I would not have classed the stairwell (even single use) as inside the house.You wouldnt normalled find a chair lift in a communal stair well though would you? I mean you might but the odds are small.
We aren't privy to how it's being worded in court, but as I'm reading it, I think it's still unclear what they mean by inside the house. I would not classify that stairwell, even if it's single use as being inside their house.
Absolutely.Whereas I would.
I agree that the way it’s worded in court could make a difference.