PADDYWHACK
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2012
- Messages
- 411
- Reaction score
- 0
And they would certainly know who Bridger was.the first and last name of the witness was given m***** H*****
how can anyone not know who the parents are
And they would certainly know who Bridger was.the first and last name of the witness was given m***** H*****
how can anyone not know who the parents are
That could be for a number of reasons and a lot of female ex partners use the children as pawns to get what they want. Even going as far as denying the father access. It could also be that, that particular relationship was not a relationship and just a quick fling. MB is a womaniser.But has he ever lived on the estate? And how much involvement has he actually had with his own children who live there?
Remember, his eldest son who does live on the estate (although the "friendly locals" are trying to drive him out) said "He has never been in my life. I have only met him on a couple of occasions".
But has he ever lived on the estate? And how much involvement has he actually had with his own children who live there?
Remember, his eldest son who does live on the estate (although the "friendly locals" are trying to drive him out) said "He has never been in my life. I have only met him on a couple of occasions".
You might not know them, but would you recognise them?
He was married to one and has two children with another - I'm guessing they were together for more than five minutes, and he had to have been around there at least twice!
Seriously, he took the kids crabbing for the day - the only reason that event was mentioned was because April allegedly went along too. I can't imagine their mum would let him turn up out of the blue after 10 years and send them out with him for the day if the children were not familiar with him. He allegedly turned up to parent evening - I would think there would have been a bit more surprise expressed if that was the first time his kids had seen him.
But, if you want to believe there is a chance MH got a good look at MB when it was dusk/dark and thought to herself, "By 'eck, who's that bloke, never seen him before" then that's your prerogative.
I am probably pressing more toward the likelihood (although not definite) than the outside chances.
All this debate around whether or not MH knew MB seems pointless when we don't know that MH even saw MB in the vehicle...Remember this is a 7yr old standing (at best) beside April, she may not have seen his face, it is a high vehicle next to a 7yr old child!
Also, did she know the car? Why would she unless she had been in it or next to it before. Most of the cars aren't parked outside houses but at Garages and on the road behind.
Again, we don't know what MH has said to LE, she could well have said she had seen the car before and she thought it might be MB....Imagine the questioning this girl would have gone through when CJ appeared and said April was missing. I should imagine all hell broke loose and possibly when MH said one thing half a dozen adults then fired questions at her. As far as I know all we have is what VF and her sister AF reported to the media and what the LE have said in press conferences.....there is only 1 definite and that is April got into a vehicle!
He took HIS kids and April crabbing NOT MH!!!
But has he ever lived on the estate? And how much involvement has he actually had with his own children who live there?
Remember, his eldest son who does live on the estate (although the "friendly locals" are trying to drive him out) said "He has never been in my life. I have only met him on a couple of occasions".
That could be for a number of reasons and a lot of female ex partners use the children as pawns to get what they want. Even going as far as denying the father access. It could also be that, that particular relationship was not a relationship and just a quick fling. MB is a womaniser.
He reportedly lived with VF
He was married to one and has two children with another - I'm guessing they were together for more than five minutes, and he had to have been around there at least twice!
But, if you want to believe there is a chance MH got a good look at MB when it was dusk/dark and thought to herself, "By 'eck, who's that bloke, never seen him before" then that's your prerogative.
I didn't suggest he took MH crabbing.
I'm missing your point.
Mine was that he had to be familiar with his own children AND April to take them out, therefore the chances are he would have been seen around the estate by more than just those 3 kids.
For those who were asking,
MB- The Suspect
AJ- Victim (lives on estate)
CJ- Victims Mum (lives on estate)
PJ- Victims Dad (lives on estate)
EG/ED- Suspects Ex and Mum to his kids SB & CB Also EG 5yrs old child (with husband now) Who is one of Aprils best friends. (lives on estate)
RG-ED's husband (lives on estate)
MH-7yr old Child WITNESS, friend of AJ and ED, the trio had played together all summer.
LH- MH's Mum (lives on estate)
KG-ED's sister, who also had 2 children with PJ
JJ-Aprils sister 16 (lives on estate)
HJ-Aprils Brother 11 (lives on estate)
DS-CJ's Step Dad
LS-CJ's Mum
VF- Suspects latest ex GF, (lives on estate)
AF- VF's sister (both have spoken to the Media)
JW-Suspects 1st wife with whom he had 3 children. (lives on estate)
SW-Suspects 'middle' son, who only met him this year (lives on estate)
CR-Suspects GF before VF
RM-CJ's Father
JM-CJ's Step-mother
MR-April's God mother (lives Aberystwyth)
CS-friend of CJ, VF & EG WITNESS who saw MB with Black bag on riverside
GE- Ex neighbour of MB
BE-ex neighbour and friendly with MB
Not only familiar, but trusted.I didn't suggest he took MH crabbing.
I'm missing your point.
Mine was that he had to be familiar with his own children AND April to take them out, therefore the chances are he would have been seen around the estate by more than just those 3 kids.
BBM
I was just thinking the same. We can only apply logic and try to pick the bones out of the information on MSM and the police information. People can believe what they want to believe but right now the focus should be on where April could be and whether we can pull together to try to work that out.
In previous cases, a poster created a list similar to this which was really useful. In that case, the names of individuals (not minors) were stated explicitly and initials assigned. The post was maintained by a single person and added at the front of every new thread. That way we could all use initials in our posts and everyone could refer back to a single list and nobody got confused. Perhaps it would be worth asking a mod if we could do that here.
ETA otherwise, a very useful post just gets lost in the thread and people can't find it.
That is only if the girl did say that, or even that April said it to the girl.But that was years ago. In this context we are discussing whether a 7-year old child recognised him. Remember that he was living 11 miles away in Llanbrynmair, and then in Caenws, for most of the last year.
I believe no such thing. MH clearly didn't recognise him, since AJ assured her that it was OK because she (AJ ) knew him. So clearly MH did not, otherwise there would have been no need to say this. Also, LE would have been able to identify his car very much more quickly than they did had MH been able to identify that it was MB.