I believe the children were 6 and 4 at the time they went to live with their fathers. I’ll have to check back on the long BM thread to be sure but that is near impossible on my phone. Suicide attempts do not usually warrant no contact, there would be supervised contact to assess the situation, relationship between children and parent, protective factors, the childrens wishes etc… this would then gradually increase over a period of time. ET has mentioned being in a seriously abusive relationship, she also sustained a broken bone (cannot remember which) and a black eye on her birthday.
Children involved in a DV relationship, will alert SS and they will become involved. If the victim chooses to stay with the perpetrator, that will cause a massive safeguarding risk and the children will be placed under child protection, that’s the highest before removal. If an incident of DV was to happen again whilst the children were on the child protection plan, SS would seek an emergency order and remove the children.
I’m wondering if this was what happened here? This is pure speculation on my part. ET gets into a relationship, already having split from the elder two fathers. This relationship becomes abusive. SS becomes involved, ET stays in relationship therefore becoming a safeguarding risk, there is another incident of abuse and SS remove children. Both fathers get custody, ET becomes suicidal and the suicide attempt takes place.
If either of these two fathers had committed DV offences, especially in the presence of the children, they would not be allowed full custody of the children. That makes me think this abusive relationship ET was in, wasn’t with either of these two men.
Again, pure speculation but that’s where my trail of thought keeps going.