UK UK - Claudia Lawrence, 35, Chef, York University, 18 March 2009 #12

[Popejohn3]

What reasons do you feel police have not arrested the male you suspect already? xx

Covid ?

 

[Vixey]

Covid ?

Thank you, yes not much getting done at the moment so makes sense x

 

[Blonderabbit]

Why did S.C post on facebook on 19th March this? My friend C.L disaphered on either 18th or 19th March 2009 she has not been seen since & the police suspect she as been murdered we continue to search for clues. S.C 19th March put this on facebook but yet not reported missing till 20th March any ideas?

That’s fabricated - where’s your proof?

 

[Blonderabbit]

Covid ?

They are hardly going to let a murderer wander the streets looking for another victim. They obviously don’t think he’s the man.

 

[Blonderabbit]

As anyone ever owned a Samsung D900 phone? Does anyone know if you can text and phone at the same time. As on phone too J.L was also texting at the same time.

20.08-20.27 C.L texts with friends
20.04-2014 talking too her mum. I've looked up this phone and other phones and at that time does not look like you could do this.

At 3.30 18th March when childminder saw her did C.L still have her back pack. Could C.L gone back home and someone waiting for her just putting another theorie out there.

She could of received an incoming text at 20.08 whilst on the phone and answered once her call had ended

 

[Popejohn3]

They are hardly going to let a murderer wander the streets looking for another victim. They obviously don’t think he’s the man.

So you don’t think police are anyway close to solving this case?
Because this time round no “thinking “ is going to be allowed . They are going to have concrete proof before arresting anyone .

 

[Yozzer]

Agree, I am back and forth with my opinion on George! was it George or someone else who claimed Claudia would see a guy in the bar, be rude and text in their company and get up snd leave for a bit of :/ Or was that another person? I do remember he left snd went straight to bookies across the road after been questioned, and I still don’t understand why George needed to go to Claudias as I am sure Suzy and peter were fine alone. Why George, ok good friend but.... He at least has a suspicion min imo x

It was a paying customer because his main point was that having met for a drink, she would abandon him mid pint, without so much as a by your leave. It was in the infamous '40 lovers' article.

 

[Blonderabbit]

So you don’t think police are anyway close to solving this case?
Because this time round no “thinking “ is going to be allowed . They are going to have concert proof before arresting anyone .

“Thinking”?

 

[Thelastleg]

Why did S.C post on facebook on 19th March this? My friend C.L disaphered on either 18th or 19th March 2009 she has not been seen since & the police suspect she as been murdered we continue to search for clues. S.C 19th March put this on facebook but yet not reported missing till 20th March any ideas?

I vaguely remember this being talked about here a long time ago. I thought the conclusion was that SC posted it probably a year later but definitely 20th March in a year after 2009. Like an anniversary post.

 

[Madpaul71]

Covid ?

Police are still out there doing there job do

Perhaps she wanted to avoid JK for a while, but if that was the case why arrange to meet up with SC at the nags on the Thursday night? - Or perhaps she didn't arrange anthing with SC for the Thursday night?

CL might not of been avoid

In my opinion it was removed in the clean up/cover up

IMO
Dyor

Wh

I was reluctant to believe the sighting at first but why was the phone powered down at noon near to the university if she was killed the previous night?

The sightings x 2 , the power down , missing work clothes and bag suggest to me claudia was in that area on that morning.

Simple the 2 sightings ate just too throw the police off a trail they after unfortunately follow every lead up even if it leads too a brick wall the 2 witnesses were annoms as for the phone switched off at noon around the area is just too make it look like CL vanished that morning on her way too work. Something happened either afternoon 3.30ish to sometime 9.30 18th march. It's all these witness statements that are lies as to why NH bunch are suspects.

 

[Blonderabbit]

Police are still out there doing there job do

CL might not of been

Police are still out there doing there job do

CL might not of been avoid

Wh

Simple the 2 sightings ate just too throw the police off a trail they after unfortunately follow every lead up even if it leads too a brick wall the 2 witnesses were annoms as for the phone switched off at noon around the area is just too make it look like CL vanished that morning on her way too work. Something happened either afternoon 3.30ish to sometime 9.30 18th march. It's all these witness statements that are lies as to why NH bunch are suspects.

Simple the 2 sightings ate just too throw the police off a trail they after unfortunately follow every lead up even if it leads too a brick wall the 2 witnesses were annoms as for the phone switched off at noon around the area is just too make it look like CL vanished that morning on her way too work. Something happened either afternoon 3.30ish to sometime 9.30 18th march. It's all these witness statements that are lies as to why NH bunch are suspects.

no, the time to look
At is 8.23pm on the 18th to - 5.am on the 19th that’s your window - I think it’s likely it happened close to 8.23pm on the 18th. That’s what I think at this moment in time. And the only person we know of that was potentially in that location then was alleyway man. - a bit later suv man - but he may of been called by the killer to help with the clean up

 

[Bagpipes]

Just a quick question re DO taking the alternative/longer route to work on the morning of the 19th. Was he/his car picked up by CCTV to confirm he took the longer route?

 

[Blonderabbit]

Just a quick question re DO taking the alternative/longer route to work on the morning of the 19th. Was he/his car picked up by CCTV to confirm he took the longer route?

Not really that important as Claudia lawrance was not seen on cctv on the 19th, furthrmore she had not been heard from since 8.23pm on the 18th

 

[Popejohn3]

Not really that important as Claudia lawrance was not seen on cctv on the 19th, furthrmore she had not been heard from since 8.23pm on the 18th

Yet the police believe she went to work Thursday morning but never got there .

 

[Bagpipes]

One way or another Claudia left her house, with or without 'assistance'. Agreed, she didn't leave by the front door. Also agree, it could have been at any time between PM on the 18th and AM on the 19th. I'm just trying to ascertain if DO has been proven to be honest about the route he took.

 

[Bagpipes]

Not really that important as Claudia lawrance was not seen on cctv on the 19th, furthrmore she had not been heard from since 8.23pm on the 18th

Not important? No such thing as a stupid question. It may not be important to you, it may not be important in the bigger scheme of things. It's a valid question from me to understand the dynamics.

 

[keep-it-real]

Not important? No such thing as a stupid question. It may not be important to you, it may not be important in the bigger scheme of things. It's a valid question from me to understand the dynamics.

1. Especially if he took the Melrosegate road route...

2. If his different route made him late for work on the 19th... was he the driver witness that saw the couple arguing on University road?

IMO
Dyor

 

[Bagpipes]

1. Especially if he took the Melrosegate road route...

2. If his different route made him late for work on the 19th... was he the driver witness that saw the couple arguing on University road?

IMO
Dyor

Not my thoughts. Ok, I'll DMOR. Thanks.

 

[Blonderabbit]

1. Especially if he took the Melrosegate road route...

2. If his different route made him late for work on the 19th... was he the driver witness that saw the couple arguing on University road?

IMO
Dyor

If he was the witness - he would know that it was or wasn’t Claudia.

 

[keep-it-real]

If he was the witness - he would know that it was or wasn’t Claudia.

1. But what if it was the hooded figure seen arguing with the female that was the point of interest to the police here not the female?
2. We know the left handed smoker seen on Weds morning with a female wore a hooded top.
While we dont know if this was Claudia we do know that Claudia did arrived safely to work that morning, but the left handed hooded figure has never come forward.
3. We also dont know wether DO or anyone else gave CL a lift to work on the Weds morn. Did she arrange to be picked up someone along that Melrosegate rd/Bridge having stayed overnight at a different location?
4. Was she waiting on Melrosegate bridge for a lift and was that lift from a mate of the figure in the hooded top ?