UK UK - Claudia Lawrence, 35, Chef, York University, 18 March 2009 #13

[Popejohn3]

I believe that the microsite is valuable but there is more evidence out there and surely why we are involved in this thread. If it was taken that "If it isn't on the microsite, it shouldn't be considered" then all of our efforts would be to no avail.

I am absolutely certain that police have much unpublished evidence that they are saving for the eventual trial.

There might never be a trial if the perpetrator somehow tells police where Claudia is .

 

[oudzuid]

I think you are just trying to make your answer fit. its a misleading reply you just would not back down there.

@Blonderabbit What I said and what I still believe is possible is :

"At the very least you could back a vehicle into the entrance of the alley."

This action by a perpetrator would act as follows:

Block the alley so that it would stop anyone else from walking down there whilst they were involved in removal
Allow them to have almost unhindered access to the back of Claudia's house and to be able to carry more easily someone or something into the back of the same vehicle
Facilitate a speedy exit.

It could be said that the above action could be caught on camera but if you look at the footage for Alley person-That camera does not cover the Alley (It can be identified as a "Globe Type" camera positioned up high on a pole into the main body of the Limes Car Park.

I have just looked at the other cameras in that vicinity and they are facing a particular direction that again does not cover the alley or would not be able to show any activity on around or at the entrance of the Alley.

Perhaps that is why Police were asking "What were they doing" because they couldn't see them walking further up HP but had to assume that they were doing something in or at the entrance of the Alley.

Of course Police may have footage of a vehicle that drives into HP but not beyond the fixed camera that I have mentioned.

The purpose of Alley person could have been to survey the scene for vehicular access and avoidance of cameras?

 

[oudzuid]

DBM

 

[oudzuid]

Nine people were arrested or interviewed under caution in the last 11 years soon to be 12 long years ! Bless them all .
I wonder how many new lines of enquiries came out of these interviews?
Do you think someone will grow a conscience after all these years ?
What headline is going to appear on the 18th March 2021 ?

@Popejohn3 I do not believe that Police feel under the same pressure to reveal anything on any future date as they were in the earlier part of the case.

 

[susie sixpence]

I doubt that a vehicle was backed into the alley because the cctv would be of a vehicle they are looking for not a person. Surely the camera would have picked up the entry and exit of such a vehicle on the Limes cctv

 

[oudzuid]

I doubt that a vehicle was backed into the alley because the cctv would be of a vehicle they are looking for not a person. Surely the camera would have picked up the entry and exit of such a vehicle on the Limes cctv

@susie sixpence It probably did but as vehicle registrations are not unique (They can be changed / cloned) they may have preferred to seek confirmation of who the person was.
I believe that they already now / knew who the person was and they were subsequently arrested.

 

[susie sixpence]

But a car has never been mentioned ever. So I doubt there was one.

 

[Blonderabbit]

@susie sixpence It probably did but as vehicle registrations are not unique (They can be changed / cloned) they may have preferred to seek confirmation of who the person was.
I believe that they already now / knew who the person was and they were subsequently arrested.

Who is the person in your opinion?

 

[Vixey]

The gates at the top of each garden is how access is through I believe to take out bins x

The gates at the top of each garden is how access is through I believe to take out bins x

The gates right close to the back of property x
View attachment 282271 View attachment 282272 View attachment 282273 View attachment 282271 View attachment 282272 View attachment 282273

There might never be a trial if the perpetrator somehow tells police where Claudia is .

I am sure after speaking with parents of missing Children, the most important thing they have expressed was the need to find their Child and arrests etc is wanted,but so so much more it is just to bring them home and bury them After all Claudia was a woman, but she is her parents Child always x

 

[Popejohn3]

I believe that the microsite is valuable but there is more evidence out there and surely why we are involved in this thread. If it was taken that "If it isn't on the microsite, it shouldn't be considered" then all of our efforts would be to no avail.

I am absolutely certain that police have much unpublished evidence that they are saving for the eventual trial.

There might never be a trial if the perpetrator somehow tells police where Claudia is .

@Popejohn3 I do not believe that Police feel under the same pressure to reveal anything on any future date as they were in the earlier part of the case.

headlines are not always dictated or approved by the police ?

 

[Popejohn3]

The gates right close to the back of property x
View attachment 282271 View attachment 282272 View attachment 282273 View attachment 282271 View attachment 282272 View attachment 282273
I am sure after speaking with parents of missing Children, the most important thing they have expressed was the need to find their Child and arrests etc is wanted,but so so much more it is just to bring them home and bury them After all Claudia was a woman, but she is her parents Child always x

Is there a double like button I could press ?
Perhaps demonstrated in a different colour ?
That bit about talking to parents with missing children is interesting... can we hear more bout it please ?

 

[susie sixpence]

The most important things in this case is firstly Claudia's family have closure, she is either found or her fate is known, secondly the person/s who took her are brought to trial.

 

[Vixey]

Is there a double like button I could press ?
Perhaps demonstrated in a different colour ?
That bit about talking to parents with missing children is interesting... can we hear more bout it please ?

I have as probably many other sleuths, Shared information with parents directly and also requested to look for information when their Child has gone missing. Corrie Mckeague ,Libby squire, Terry Mcspadden to name a few where direct contact was possible. This I found very useful, but frustrating in the Claudia case as not possible x

 

[Popejohn3]

@susie sixpence It probably did but as vehicle registrations are not unique (They can be changed / cloned) they may have preferred to seek confirmation of who the person was.
I believe that they already now / knew who the person was and they were subsequently arrested.

Dai did say at one time that he was not going to take any more names for the ally man unless they were backed up by other evidence . This does not mean the man is known for sure !
They say they still want to identify him and the only way IMO is to hear the words ‘ yes officer that is me ‘
Then and only then would the public be told he’s been identified .IMO

 

[oudzuid]

Who is the person in your opinion?

@Blonderabbit I don't have an opinion

 

[oudzuid]

But a car has never been mentioned ever. So I doubt there was one.

Not quite true @susie sixpence But perhaps the car(s) mentioned was / were not shown in all circumstances.

 

[Vixey]

Not quite true @susie sixpence But perhaps the car(s) mentioned was / were not shown in all circumstances.

Was there a small dark vehicle shown on morning and evening cctv ?

 

[Vixey]

Was Claudias sensor light wired up and working at the time of her disappearance?

 

[Vixey]

So Jen and Claudia were out in Cyprus around Christmas time x

 

[Vixey]