No American man at honingtonWho? 4minute man?
No American man at honingtonWho? 4minute man?
Did Corrie have a few regular hook ups? Maybe some young lady who hadn't been out came and picked him up. The something has happened elsewhere.
Also, the no CCTV of him leaving the area. Isn't it possible that when the camera focused in on the runner that it therefore momentarily is not focusing on the area where Corrie could have left on foot?
Unless he had spoken to the driver, then decided to try and grab a lift on the back like the old school bin men did
Where is the CCTV of the bin lorry??????
No American man at honington
I'm asking about this American guy at honington that was ment to be a good friend, ware did this come from, news to me,Don't get what you're asking....I've twice read Cags giving statement from Mamma Mia man (about Corrie's American friend) as well as providing link
I'm asking about this American guy at honington that was ment to be a good friend, ware did this come from, news to me,
It came from the statement of the takeaway worker in Mamma Mia I believeI'm asking about this American guy at honington that was ment to be a good friend, ware did this come from, news to me,
The "4 minute man" may have seen nothing at all. Four minutes is quite a long time. That's one angle.
Then again, he could have seen everything.
Or even been "a party to" whatever may have happened.
I depends what "theory" you go with.
If Corrie entered at 0325 and "4 minute man" is seen at 0329...
...then where is the camera looking for "240 seconds" or so ?
If you say "if Corrie left on foot, he would be have been seen", it is not the same as saying "all the activity in that area was covered".
Didnt NT the police say they were witholding a small piece of cctv back? That could be the very footage you're referring too
Being pedantic now, but it has never been stated he couldn't leave by bike - only foot.The roof access was checked. There was a news article where they talled about whether he went on the roof and it said the whole roof is not covered however they could see he didn't go up there.
It's on the findcorrie website, you cannot leave the area without being caught on cctv whether that be walking or biking. The horseshoe backs onto building which would mean jumping off the roof of a building, not really a smart thing to do when they're two storeys (at least)
The cctv map includes only council cameras and not private.
Link to roof section I referred to http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/73...tland-Yard-RAF-airman-missing-Bury-St-Edmunds
Didnt NT the police say they were witholding a small piece of cctv back? That could be the very footage you're referring too
Can't see anything in that link about the honington American guy just the take away man from mildenhal ,
Being pedantic now, but it has never been stated he couldn't leave by bike - only foot.
The police statements are on both the find Corrie webpage and the Suffolk police page- it's not a lack of trust, just a different perspective. Family keep adding vague pieces of information. The police have released information but nowhere near as in depth as the family. I just wonder what conclusions could be drawn, if any from purely the police perspective- and thus what questions the police have currently left unanswered (some areas of which I know the family have tried to address)Where are the police statements? In the press or on the website? What would be the hoped for outcome? Do you not trust the police and/or the family statements?
Can't see anything in that link about the honington American guy just the take away man from mildenhal ,
Can't see anything in that link about the honington American guy just the take away man from mildenhal ,
Truth, what was your question to me again?
I think they have to be sure before they pull anyone
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.