- Joined
- Nov 25, 2016
- Messages
- 10,088
- Reaction score
- 35,978
If they want to find him, you would think so would nt you yorkshire. It seems to be all deliberately misleading. The cctv for instance is not 100% but is 25% unless motion is detected .
It already has I think. Everyone must be just letting it all permeate the grey matter before commenting.I was just thinking that if the police conclude that (a) there is no evidence of foul play and (b) they have run out of lines of enquiry for the present, and the family do go ahead with engaging a PI, then it seems likely that in the near future only lines of enquiry acceptable to the family are likely to be pursued. And if a PI's enquiries lead him in a direction the family is not happy with he may be told to ignore them or find himself paid off.
This could go very quiet methinks.
DC
The Find Corrie section is part of the 7pm news on the Forces TV channel, which is available on Sky, Virgin & Freesat. It's not a Sky News item.
It already has I think. Everyone must be just letting it all permeate the grey matter before commenting.
It seems he could have walked, ridden, climbed, driven, been driven out and it could have been willingly or unwillingly to coincide with the 04.30 ping when his phone left the BSE mast. The phone pings seem to be all we have now and I am still not certain about them, especially as I now I have doubts which footage is actually his last sighting?OK, so are we now going to revisit the possibility that Corrie COULD have walked out of the horseshoe without been captured by any of the cameras.
I questioned a while back about how Tony was able to come to conclusion he couldn't have done without having real time access to all of the private CCTVs and physically testing every possible scenario. IMO this hasn't been done and so I'm going to work on the basis that Corrie could have walked out unless we have concrete proof otherwise
I was just thinking that if the police conclude that (a) there is no evidence of foul play and (b) they have run out of lines of enquiry for the present, and the family do go ahead with engaging a PI, then it seems likely that in the near future only lines of enquiry acceptable to the family are likely to be pursued. And if a PI's enquiries lead him in a direction the family is not happy with he may be told to ignore them or find himself paid off.
This could go very quiet methinks.
I don't know what more anyone can do? Can the family have access to the cctv? I suppose a Pi team can knock doors, talk to people, but there are 3 vehicles to be tracked down, surely only the police can do that as you'd need a search warrant etc, such a mess of a situation really
The police are in a sticky situation as there is no evidence of foul play. How long do they go on with this. No matter how much we speculate, add ideas. The fact remains , no evidence. So people are saying about lack of funding resources ect but is this not an example of a waste of police resources? Sorry if it sounds callous and my observation only.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
I'm curious as to how a PI operates, if anyone can help. For example, how does it work liaising with the police? To what evidence already collected would they be allowed access?
If a PI has to kind of 'start over' with interviews etc, doesn't it just delay moving forward?
I see what you're saying but when the police said they were using all resources that they would use "in a murder enquiry" but have yet to follow up with leads, it doesn't support their statement.
This is the link http://www.itv.com/news/anglia/2016...ning-corrie-disappeared-go-on-show-to-public/
And this is a still of the blue car![]()
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
To be honest I really struggle to see what a PI can realistically achieve in this case that the police haven't.
Yes, a PI can knock on doors but if this was worth doing the police would have done so.
A PI can legally obtain registration details of a vehicle only if he is a member of the ABI as he can apply to a specific ABI member firm which has legal access to the DVLA's database. If those vehicles are traceable the police will have traced them.
A PI could try to talk to Corrie's friends in the RAF and USAF but at best they will tell him only what the police already know.
I just find it very strange that a serving police officer is looking to hire a PI.
To be honest I really struggle to see what a PI can realistically achieve in this case that the police haven't.
Yes, a PI can knock on doors but if this was worth doing the police would have done so.
A PI can legally obtain registration details of a vehicle only if he is a member of the ABI as he can apply to a specific ABI member firm which has legal access to the DVLA's database. If those vehicles are traceable the police will have traced them.
A PI could try to talk to Corrie's friends in the RAF and USAF but at best they will tell him only what the police already know.
I just find it very strange that a serving police officer is looking to hire a PI.
What do people have on the thoughts of the blue car? I know it has cropped up a few times and salvage yard has been mentioned do people think as to whether forensics have been done on the car has it ever been searched? I do have the memory span of a goldfishand too much to trawl through to find any answers Thanks
Maybe what some in the group are saying is right maybe the police have there own links and evidence and are pointing there direction at the sexuality nature or even turning on the family themselves I just cant get what Nicola said in that interview out my head was a very powerful statement. Something a clearly upset her trust is a major thing to lose and with her being a fellow officer was they untrusting Nicola and the family ?