From 2011
In the end, the odds were overwhelmingly against Prince Andrew getting away with it. Too many questions, and not enough answers, have dogged his footsteps for too long. As Britain's roving Trade Ambassador, he had to go. But the question remains - why was he appointed in the first place?
His was a job with no parallel in the British establishment. Answerable to nobody, unrequired to file reports of his activities, the benefits of his expensive hops around the globe never quantified on paper or in Parliament, his expenses parcelled out among Government departments so as to become virtually invisible, Andrew looks at this juncture to have been on a glorious freebie for the past decade.
A year ago, I made a very determined attempt to discover just what it was that he did on behalf of his country. Nobody - not Buckingham Palace, nor the Department for Business Innovation and Skills, nor the Foreign Office, all of whom have some responsibility in answering for his activities abroad - were prepared to give an answer.
One former civil servant enlightened me, but not much, by remarking in an unguarded moment, "There appears to be very little official scrutiny of his activities, but a lot of secrecy. That's very odd for such a high-profile figure."
Only time will tell whether Andrew's colossally stupid involvement with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and its so far unforeseen consequences were the trigger to his downfall, or whether exasperated mandarins finally found the courage to close their departmental purse-strings on his Class 1 travel.
The recent clash of events over Prince Andrew amply demonstrates that royalty should stay out of business, and they should equally stay out of the business of Government.
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk