You might be forgiven for thinking that, but he's only repeating the evidence. That's what makes the defence so farcical, really.Cant wait to hear the judges post verdict chat, sounds like hes quite clear in his belief of what happened
You might be forgiven for thinking that, but he's only repeating the evidence. That's what makes the defence so farcical, really.Cant wait to hear the judges post verdict chat, sounds like hes quite clear in his belief of what happened
It was needed I think, since Stewart repeated so many times that he had been diagnosed with cancer and only had 3 months to live.
What a flipping hypochondriac. Oooh I'm dying everyone pity me and pay me loads of attention. Oh...sorry... just a bad case of the arsegrapes.
The defendant made a journey to Leatherhead on April 18, 2016.
The offices of Anthony Hurley had once been there, and the defendant went there without realising the offices had been moved to London.
Mr Hurley received a call from his PA asking him to call the defendant.
He said when he called him, the defendant said I am in a terrible state, I was going to look you straight in the eye and ask you if Helen was staying with you.
Mr Hurley told him that if she had turned up on his doorstep, he wouldve told her to contact the police. The prosecution ask why if the defendant knew Helen had been kidnapped by Joe and Nick, why didnt he confide in Tony Hurley, rather than ask him if Helen was with him, which he knew not to be true?
Thank you neteditor........arsegrapes ......you made me laugh so much, this guy has been playing the poor me for 20 years what a ****[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
I know, I'm beginning to wonder if he deliberately walked into that bloody glass door to get compo now :giggle::giggle:
Any thoughts on why IS really made that trip to Tony Hurley a week after Helen died? He admits himself he knew she wasnt with him and the story about confiding him about the kidnappers was clearly BS. So what was the true purpose of that visit?
Was he going to play the worried fiancee who thought Tony might know where she was, in an attempt to get Tony onside for when the will came into play?
Or was he going to ask him about the will?
My understanding was the visit just proved IS had Helen's will at the forefront of his mind, he knew Tony Hurley had great power in this respect and he had to keep him on side and believing he was innocent in her disappearance. And wasn't there some mention of bad blood between IS and Tony Hurley - that TH had made some comment about the wedding, maybe suggested there was no engagement? I was never clear about this when it was raised, or the context. Anyone else recall it?
Also I would also imagine it will be not lost on the jury just how he managed to get a monthly income of nearly 2 grand whilst unemployed.
This is a man who seems not to have worked since his mid-thirties due to ‘ill health’ so hardly time to build up a pension pot. At best he’s only going to get a minimal amount on any investments at today’s rates so has he been fiddling welfare on the grounds of his ‘illness’ despite a doctor saying he is essentially fit and healthy. Questions should be asked!!!
Any thoughts on why IS really made that trip to Tony Hurley a week after Helen died? He admits himself he knew she wasnt with him and the story about confiding him about the kidnappers was clearly BS. So what was the true purpose of that visit?
Was he going to play the worried fiancee who thought Tony might know where she was, in an attempt to get Tony onside for when the will came into play?
Or was he going to ask him about the will?
Also I would also imagine it will be not lost on the jury just how he managed to get a monthly income of nearly 2 grand whilst unemployed.
This is a man who seems not to have worked since his mid-thirties due to ill health so hardly time to build up a pension pot. At best hes only going to get a minimal amount on any investments at todays rates so has he been fiddling welfare on the grounds of his illness despite a doctor saying he is essentially fit and healthy. Questions should be asked!!!
Sedative found in hair samples
Toxicologist Dr Mark Piper examined samples of Helen Baileys hair. The sedative drug Zopiclone was found in these samples, as well as Helens chest cavity fluid, liver sample and muscle tissue.
A very low level of paracetamol was also found in Helens chest cavity fluid.
He told you that although Zopiclone will disappear from the body of a living person after only days, it will become incorporated into the hair, where it will be detectable for a long time thereafter.
He said on the assumption Helen met her death on April 11, the Zopiclone had been ingested by Helen as early as February 2016. He said Zopiclone would have been ingested by Helen more than once.
Prescription-only drug was for insomnia
Dr Piper said Zopiclone was a prescription only drug, taken for insomnia.
He said the tablets should be swallowed whole. Zopiclone is rapidly absorbed after administration and effects on the nervous system appear one or two hours after use.
He told you a bitter or metallic taste in the mouth is an adverse effect of Zopiclone, which may affect one in 10 people.
He said in some cases, the taste may not be apparent, due to the fact the patient had been asleep when abnormal taste would have otherwise been apparent.
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/incoming/live-helen-bailey-murder-trial-12627822
I was just talking about this with my daughter, I am baffled as to his £2000 Per month, he clearly never worked long enough for a pension of any kind , I know some of this will be disability benefits but certainly not all, it's a mystery.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So, apart from the adverse taste being something which * may * affect one in 10 people....
there is also this point -that if Helen fell asleep quickly each time she was dosed with the Zopiclone ( being as it was likely a heavy dose ) then she may never have known about the taste at all.
Also I would also imagine it will be not lost on the jury just how he managed to get a monthly income of nearly 2 grand whilst unemployed.
This is a man who seems not to have worked since his mid-thirties due to ‘ill health’ so hardly time to build up a pension pot. At best he’s only going to get a minimal amount on any investments at today’s rates so has he been fiddling welfare on the grounds of his ‘illness’ despite a doctor saying he is essentially fit and healthy. Questions should be asked!!!
So, apart from the adverse taste being something which * may * affect one in 10 people....
there is also this point -that if Helen fell asleep quickly each time she was dosed with the Zopiclone ( being as it was likely a heavy dose ) then she may never have known about the taste at all.
I know, I'm beginning to wonder if he deliberately walked into that bloody glass door to get compo now :giggle::giggle:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.