GUILTY UK - Jayden Parkinson, 17, Oxfordshire, 3 Dec 2013

  • #161
Fingers crossed then!
 
  • #162
Verdict: Ben Blakeley is guilty of murder. An 11-1 majority verdict!
 
  • #163
Yay! About time
 
  • #164
Looks as though they haven't yet agreed a verdict on Jake. (So I was right about Friday, lol)
Ben is to be sentenced tomorrow, so no time being wasted there.

Quite shocked that there was a dissenter over BB, but I suppose there are bleeding heart types people who just don't want to find anybody guilty.
Thank heaven it didn't go like 12 Angry Men :floorlaugh:
 
  • #165
  • #166
  • #167
  • #168
'A young man has been found guilty of murdering his 17-year-old pregnant ex-girlfriend and burying her body in his uncle's grave.'

'During his trial, it emerged that Blakeley was a serial abuser of girlfriends. He controlled them, not allowing them to socialise with anyone else, and confiscated their phones. He also punched, kicked and bit them.'

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/24/ben-blakeley-guilty-murdering-jayden-parkinson

Just heard on BBC Radio news that a police spokesman has said this case is 'unique in English criminal history', for Blakeley's burying then digging up, taking a taxi and finally reburying Jayden's body in his uncle's grave. He left flowers on it too.
 
  • #169

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 54
  • #170
He certainly doesn't look like he's got it in him to do what he did (though I believed from the beginning he was a nasty piece of work, as did others on here) just goes to show that looks CAN be deceiving.

Interesting that he left flowers on the grave. I don't think thats been reported before.. a pitiful act of remorse?

Also if I was the uncles wife, child, family member etc I'd be after his blood for desecrating the grave alone, let alone the reason why. He hasn't been charged with anything relating to the actual didturbance of the uncles grave has he? I dont think either brother has.. if I was family I wouldnt be happy about that. I know in the grand scheme of things its not the most important but id want him to pay for doing that to my loved ones grave
 
  • #171
  • #172
  • #173
  • #174
  • #175
  • #176
Judges remarks in full. Not much we haven't heard - position in which he buried her is vile

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgmen...his-honour-judge-eccles-q-c-r-v-ben-blakeley/


Yes, for a while I did think that he should have some credit for burying her in "a proper place", but not now those details have been revealed.

The judge says "to a limited extent I accept that you began to have feelings of guilt about where you had buried her." Well, I don't agree. I think if he had left her where he first buried her, there would have been a good chance that somebody's dog would have found her. I bet that's what preyed on his mind, and why he moved her. People don't usually take their dogs into graveyards.

It surprises me that there's apparently no precedent for burying a murder victim in an established grave. Makes you wonder if it's actually been done many times - successfully. :thinking:
 
  • #177
Indeed it does! Didn't he commit a crime by disturbing a pre existing grave? I haven't seen any charges in relation to that.. small change I guess in the grand scheme of things.

Still, this "man" will only be 42 when released if he behaves inside. I don't think this is the last we've heard of him.
 
  • #178
Indeed it does! Didn't he commit a crime by disturbing a pre existing grave? I haven't seen any charges in relation to that.. small change I guess in the grand scheme of things.

Judge did take that into account when sentencing, paras 14 & 15.

Still, this "man" will only be 42 when released if he behaves inside. I don't think this is the last we've heard of him.

Is he capable of behaving himself, though? Not if his behaviour in court is any indication.
 
  • #179
Judge did take that into account when sentencing, paras 14 & 15.



Is he capable of behaving himself, though? Not if his behaviour in court is any indication.
Noted. However it is a legal offence to disturb human remains and their place of burial so I guess I was just expecting some seperate charges solely relatibg to that
 
  • #180

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
67
Guests online
2,133
Total visitors
2,200

Forum statistics

Threads
632,798
Messages
18,631,875
Members
243,295
Latest member
Safeplace07
Back
Top