I’d say judging how it is reflective it’s possibly a high viz vest or jacket . MOO . Also I’m not sure if we are allowed to discuss the contents of the vid on here ?Can’t really say if it’s Lindsay’s jacket or not but the video is very eery indeed.
I’d say judging how it is reflective it’s possibly a high viz vest or jacket . MOO . Also I’m not sure if we are allowed to discuss the contents of the vid on here ?Can’t really say if it’s Lindsay’s jacket or not but the video is very eery indeed.
BumpALL discussion related to a random youtube video has been removed. The video was not from an approved source.
Please do not continue to discuss it.
Thanks.
I nor anyone in my circle of friends know him so can’t say on that.
I don’t think it helps a lot either with some of the terms LE have used imo
Calling the body an object....could that have meant it’s was wrapped and they were unable to verify a body, but they had a good idea and considering there was a missing woman they err’d on caution and forensically tested it before taking off what ever it was wrapped in.
Concealed...shallow grave, under undergrowth or the fact it may have been wrapped?
I think the body was still intact, based purely on no charges were made for dismembering it.
Compression of the neck...did he strangle her?
Lindsay was 5 11. Not your average height for a woman around here, I wonder how tall he is.
If he is a lot smaller than her he wouldn’t he have the disadvantage? He would have had to knock her off her feet
Sexual assault and rape is often about control and not really about sexual attractiveness.i don't think it was a sexual motive at all
Lindsay was a 47 year old woman, not an obvious person to develop an obsession or attraction to really. would a 16 year old really be attracted to this quite conservative looking lady? more likely, given his background, he would be more interested in glammed up younger girls, but then i could be wrong....
"Like" x10,000.Sexual assault and rape is often about control and not really about sexual attractiveness.
What's his background?i don't think it was a sexual motive at all
Lindsay was a 47 year old woman, not an obvious person to develop an obsession or attraction to really. would a 16 year old really be attracted to this quite conservative looking lady? more likely, given his background, he would be more interested in glammed up younger girls, but then i could be wrong....
I assume it's a reference to a traveller lifestyle.What's his background?
Ah. So we're back to rumors again, eh?I assume it's a reference to a traveller lifestyle.
That old merry go roundAh. So we're back to rumors again, eh?
Sexual assault and rape is often about control and not really about sexual attractiveness.
This boy is obviously not "most 16 year olds". Most 16 y/o kids don't go around murdering people. This is an incredibly violent and dangerous person we're talking about, not our own benevolent sons. It is completely reasonable, IMO, for this to have been a simple case of sexual assault and murder, wild theories aside.With most 16 year olds I know it truly IS about looks. Looks,brands, latest gadgets etc ...
I believe I saw you mention elsewhere that you are exLE so your knowledge would be far more well informed than mine...but surely, sex attack has far more to do with power and acting on urges rather than physical attraction? Other than those who for instance deliberately target a "type" for specific reasons.i don't think it was a sexual motive at all
Lindsay was a 47 year old woman, not an obvious person to develop an obsession or attraction to really. would a 16 year old really be attracted to this quite conservative looking lady? more likely, given his background, he would be more interested in glammed up younger girls, but then i could be wrong....
Exactly. That's quite some leap....into gadgets and looks, to sexual predator!This boy is obviously not "most 16 year olds". Most 16 y/o kids don't go around murdering people. This is an incredibly violent and dangerous person we're talking about, not our own benevolent sons. It is completely reasonable, IMO, for this to have been a simple case of sexual assault and murder, wild theories aside.
i don't think it was a sexual motive at all
Lindsay was a 47 year old woman, not an obvious person to develop an obsession or attraction to really. would a 16 year old really be attracted to this quite conservative looking lady? more likely, given his background, he would be more interested in glammed up younger girls, but then i could be wrong....
@CharlestonGal sits on fingers.Words fail me.
Who knows? Nobody here does that’s for sureI believe I saw you mention elsewhere that you are exLE so your knowledge would be far more well informed than mine...but surely, sex attack has far more to do with power and acting on urges rather than physical attraction? Other than those who for instance deliberately target a "type" for specific reasons.
I'm not assuming in saying this that it was a sex predator attack by the way.
I believe I saw you mention elsewhere that you are exLE
I agree. And I think some people (and maybe the 16 y/o in question here) have those urges and then act on them when a victim/opportunity presents itself. The victim could be 2, or 40 or 90 years old. No one is immune.I believe I saw you mention elsewhere that you are exLE so your knowledge would be far more well informed than mine...but surely, sex attack has far more to do with power and acting on urges rather than physical attraction? Other than those who for instance deliberately target a "type" for specific reasons.
I'm not assuming in saying this that it was a sex predator attack by the way.
Confused by this as it responds to my post but thinking that's just coincidental.Who knows? Nobody here does that’s for sure
Just looking at it from different perspectives rather than the same old ‘power’ Etc.
I’m not sure why people are still referring to the things we’ve been told to not discuss either, seems some want the thread closed down again