Most likely to be cause of death, and in relation to any other injuries, such as defence wounds, estimate as to time of death, and how the pathologist came to those conclusions. The defence may also have their own pathologist in court at the pertinent time, if they wish to challenge any of the prosecution’s pathologists findings. I am not sure in this case, if there were two post-mortems carried out, one for each for the prosecution and the defence.Could someone give us some info about pathology evidence as this is what we are expecting tomorrow ?
Last edited: