And thanks to @jamjim too.Thank you for all your work Bampot
And thanks to @jamjim too.Thank you for all your work Bampot
when will the defendant take to the stand?
They are not normal and court usually sits from 945 until 1230/1300 with a 20 minute coffee break around 1115The same here. I'm not familiar with court proceedings, but i did wonder if (apart from the obvious lunch and 'coffee break') all the chamber sittings and other stoppages were normal.
He won't. Only my opinionwhen will the defendant take to the stand?
I think it was assumed LB went up by WA but she could have accessed via Peel Park, they wouldn't know which way she went. I guess what the defence is getting at is would also mean that other people could have entered and exited via Peel Park and they wouldn't necessarily know... Who and whenI’m confused, you walk up peel park avenue to access the coppice
so theres no proof lindsay was ever even on the coppice?
I'm not so well versed on all the cctv sightings as others here but wasn't he sighted emerging from the Coppice with her in the bin? Also they have scraping of the bin on the concrete plinths from somewhere around that vicinity.so theres no proof lindsay was ever even on the coppice?
I would be very very surprised if that were the case (albeit I can see where you are coming from because I personally don’t believe that it has been proven that RM killed LB, never mind proved beyond all reasonable doubt) but in my experience that hasn’t happened before and prior to a full crown court trial , there are procedures that are gone through to test the value of the evidence and if it is considered sufficient to take it to court with the probability of a 90% rate of conviction or more. Often they will hold a ‘voire dire’ ( trial within a trial) to ascertain this .It's only a guess but I wouldn't be surprised if the reason for the meeting in chambers was the defence asking the judge to consider dismissing the case for lack of evidence. This does not meet the required standards for prosecution in my opinion.
I wonder if they tested/matched the soil in the knife box. I don't think anything about the knife has been reported except in so far as there were no knife wounds on the body and her trainers were cut up. But nothing about whether it was that knife.Soil recovered with her body is from the coppice.
I wonder if they tested/matched the soil in the knife box. I don't think anything about the knife has been reported except in so far as there were no knife wounds on the body and her trainers were cut up. But nothing about whether it was that knife.
Morning....
Hopefully I will be able to follow as it happens today, spent last night catching up..
There is still no real evidence of him killing her.... With all the other findings, like trainers in skip nr the body, gloves nr the body, bin nr the body, no attempt really at clearing away evidence properly, it's like he had no concern about the items being found. I was wondering "if" there was someone else involved if they had removed all clothing, but then why wud they leave the trainers... Why the heck would anyone leave the trainers.
I am still trying to work out how dna was inly on the left glove, has anyone got a theory? Or did he go to the gym to build up just his left arm so all the moving could be done with his left haha
Looking forward to hearing more about the saw that was found... And hopefully there is more evidence to come out but I can't see it pointing to him killing her, so far all evidence can be covered by him moving the body.
Would any of the new members who are locals to the area it happened tell me how much police presence there was around the area of the oub/herhouse/cemetery on the 17th?
I thought they were reconvening now?I wonder why no evidence will be heard in court this afternoon?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.