- Joined
- Nov 15, 2020
- Messages
- 1,639
- Reaction score
- 13,058
You have completely lost me now !It’s a morally neutral word.
You have completely lost me now !It’s a morally neutral word.
It’s not necessarily wrong to kill. to murder is to do wrong but to kill not necessarily. It does not imply guilt or responsibility.You have completely lost me now !
Im dead tired so I cannot argue any more.It’s a morally neutral word.
Sleep well, Dotta, and wishing you better dreams!Im dead tired so I cannot argue any more.
Good night
Sweet dreams!
By the way, I had this terrible nightmare the other night - a strange nurse was chasing me with a huge syringe in a kind of tunnel.
Geez!
I couldn't sleep a wink after that!!!![]()
Til the morrow Dotta, may you dream of soft furry things instead. Let not the old hag bother you.Im dead tired so I cannot argue any more.
Good night
Sweet dreams!
By the way, I had this terrible nightmare the other night - a strange nurse was chasing me with a huge syringe in a kind of tunnel.
Geez!
I couldn't sleep a wink after that!!!![]()
How so?It’s a morally neutral word.
In my post I said it was either a commode OR seat. Here is the seat.Well good heavens, Talk about coincidences. Found this today at my new home. I’m almost convinced it’s the same one in her garage and isn’t actually a commode, it’s just a seat.View attachment 415821
Yes, she was definitely sociable and clearly had a good circle of friends. This, for me, is one of the things which makes this whole case so unusual.She seemed to be quite sociable, though.
Sorry but seriously?It’s not necessarily wrong to kill. to murder is to do wrong but to kill not necessarily. It does not imply guilt or responsibility.
Hope Sweeper doesn't mind my answering, but I think he means kill does not necessarily mean murder.Do you mean neutral term not word ?
Reasonable point; however it can’t be viewed as a neutral word.Hope Sweeper doesn't mind my answering, but I think he means kill does not necessarily mean murder.
Not just casual friends, either. Friends that thought very highly of her, at least before everything kicked off.Yes, she was definitely sociable and clearly had a good circle of friends. This, for me, is one of the things which makes this whole case so unusual.
Indeed. Most of the pictures we see of her were snaffled from Facebook. They show her in the company of others in social settings and, it would appear in many cases, were posted publicly by other people who were happy enough to be associated with her.Not just casual friends, either. Friends that thought very highly of her, at least before everything kicked off.
Exactly that. I don’t really want to go on a tangent about the way words are used I just think she has used that word repetitively for a reasonHope Sweeper doesn't mind my answering, but I think he means kill does not necessarily mean murder.
Neutrality? Is the word 'killed' neutral? When talking about dead babies who experts say were physically attacked, I don't think using 'killed' is really that neutral of a word.here’s a long shot and Im trying to figure something out. I’m genuinely wondering about her use of the word “killed”. For some reason it jumps out at me and features in plenty of the notes.
for instance if someone is confessing to the crime of murder do they use the word “killed” or ”murdered”? I don’t know if I’m just getting caught up on the neutrality of the word.
Not in that context no. But the word by itself is neutral. It doesn’t refer to any social construct. For instance “right and wrong”.it simply means to inflict death upon Without attaching human emotion to it or thought.Neutrality? Is the word 'killed' neutral? When talking about dead babies who experts say were physically attacked, I don't think using 'killed' is really that neutral of a word.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.