and, I would say, as we are learning with every day of evidence, there is so much more to this case than the experts' diagnoses of deliberate harm, and what first appeared to the doctors to be inexplicable collapses and deaths.
There are the many associated allegations, as the year progressed, of premeditation and calculated design of each incident; discrepancies which came through analysis of the medical records, text messages, and parents' accounts, which also need to be justified, if one disregards the many experts' opinions.
How to explain the examples of babies who were seen not to be in declining health by their parents at a time when LL recorded serious problems, in some instances reviewed by doctors and noted to be well without reference to the incidents LL later noted, and in other instances said to have been seen by anonymous SHOs who have no record of it, as well as all the adjustments of times in paper records, and observations charts not matching up?
JMO
