- Joined
- Oct 24, 2022
- Messages
- 2,974
- Reaction score
- 9,354
Don’t get it. The situation reads to me that the process of deliberation was suspended by the judge due to juror absence and now the judge has allowed the process to resume.
Maybe that info is still coming once things get underway?I don't think it's normal wording. It suggests to me some kind of decision. But I have a feeling they are still 12 because I don't see why they couldn't report a reduction in number.
Yeah, I may be over thinking it.Don’t get it. The situation reads to me that the process of deliberation was suspended by the judge due to juror absence and now the judge has allowed the process to resume.
I love Swiss cheese...Odd or not - the case is proceeding
Seeking holes is advisable only when buying Swiss cheese.
JMO
Or when one is the keyholderOdd or not - the case is proceeding
Seeking holes is advisable only when buying Swiss cheese.
JMO
I think it might be finished on Friday afternoon. Five more days to plow through the charges.I still think it's gonna go into next week or the one after :/
Wow, so what does this tell us? They are focusing on the 2 insulin cases, specifically a timing question----maybe trying to decide if LL was responsible for those cases or not?
I think they might base some of the other verdicts upon these 2 insulin cases. If they are all convinced these 2 cases were malicious actions and that LL was responsible, then some of the other charges are more probable?Maybe not as far along their deliberations as we had hoped, if they are questioning the 2 insulin babies (the 2 strongest cases IMHO).
Dan O'Donoghue
Court has just reassembled for a juror question. The panel of eight women and four men have asked for clarification on a specific point about the cases of Child F and L, the insulin cases
'Can you please clarify how long it would take for babies' insulin to c-peptide ratio to return to normal after manufactured insulin is stopped', they ask.
Judge James Goss says the answer is there is 'no evidence' on that particular topic
Would be easy to assume the cases Have been reviewed by the jury chronologically but might not be the case. Much has been said about just how important those cases are to the prosecutions case over all And it’s true. The jury may have looked at every other case other than those ones but yeh could also be true that they are doing it chronologically which might mean many more weeks to go.Maybe not as far along their deliberations as we had hoped, if they are questioning the 2 insulin babies (the 2 strongest cases IMHO).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.