VERDICT WATCH UK - Nurse Lucy Letby, Faces 22 Charges - 7 Murder/15 Attempted Murder of Babies #29

[notsure]

They make me want to cry too, as they hurt my brain.

Ohhh, shocking!

 

[Parker Knoll]

In the words of our proverb Queen @Dotta
“ the dogs bark, the caravan goes on “
We are making progress.
Let’s see what tomorrow brings.
Sleep tight all.

 

[Dotta]

In the words of our proverb Queen @Dotta
“ the dogs bark, the caravan goes on “
We are making progress.
Let’s see what tomorrow brings.
Sleep tight all.

What tomorrow brings?
Me to the shredder

Serves me right for taking part in a gamble!!!

 

[WaxLyrical]

I have used this dogs/caravan saying at least twice since I read it, I love it!

 

[esther43]

Was this the baby where LL was said to ask who the "transfer team" was?

No I think that was concerning childP.

 

[esther43]

Length of Deliberations Predictions (and backers!)

Mon 10th - day 1 (afternoon only) - 2pm to 4pm minus 5mins = 1h 55m
Tue 11th - day 2 - 4h 20m
Wed 12th - day 3 - 4h 20m
Thu 13th - day 4 - 4h 20m
Fri 14th - day 5 - 4h 20m
Mon 24th - day 6 - 4h 20m
Tue 25th - day 7 - 4h 20m
Wed 26th - day 8 - 4h 15m

Running total = 32h 10m


Still in the game -

32h 14m - @Kittybunny (backed by @marynnu )
34h - @bbsaz
35h 25m - @Dotta
41h 15m - @Observant-ADHD-ENFP-BSc
45h 10m - @esther43
58h - @Jw192
70h - @bobbymkii
75h - @CS2C
80h - @V347

All being well, Monday is the day! 45h 10 mins.

 

[katydid23]

I guess it is to make Jurors
(generally speaking)
to pay attention in Court.
To prevent them from relying solely on copies they think might be later provided.

JMO

Once a teacher, always a teacher....

 

[Dotta]

I think all condemned to a shredder should organize a "Shredder Party"

Ave Shredder!
Morituri Te Salutant!

JMO

 

[Kemug]

I'm scared to listen in case bagpipes are involved.

Nooo! I love bagpipes, they stir up the Scottish blood in me!

 

[Kemug]

I think all condemned to a shredder should organize a "Shredder Party"

Ave Shredder!
Morituri Te Salutant!

JMO

I'll be there! And I'll bring all the shredded veggies!

 

[Sweeper2000]

I would be interested to hear any theories on why the jury seemed to spend such little time on baby g. baby G was the 100 day old baby whose 100th day was celebrated on the ward and was unfortunately sabotaged if guilty. She was also given a 5% chance of survival at birth. I can’t quite remember allot of it in whole but wondering if others thought it a strong case.

Anyone think that’s more attention grabbing?

 

[Tortoise]

I would be interested to hear any theories on why the jury seemed to spend such little time on baby g. baby G was the 100 day old baby whose 100th day was celebrated on the ward and was unfortunately sabotaged if guilty. She was also given a 5% chance of survival at birth. I can’t quite remember allot of it in whole but wondering if others thought it a strong case.

Anyone think that’s more attention grabbing?

I wouldn't presume anything about the order of their deliberations, without more questions from them to go on.

They could be in agreement over some cases and only deliberating others. Or maybe they've done murder charges first and then going over attempted murder charges, and maybe their question about insulin was to do with baby L, and going in more random order looking at their lists of patterns say.

 

[Moll]

I would be interested to hear any theories on why the jury seemed to spend such little time on baby g. baby G was the 100 day old baby whose 100th day was celebrated on the ward and was unfortunately sabotaged if guilty. She was also given a 5% chance of survival at birth. I can’t quite remember allot of it in whole but wondering if others thought it a strong case.

Anyone think that’s more attention grabbing?

We don't know how long they have spent on Baby G, do we?
(EDIT Posted at the same time as Tortoise and agree with her comment.)

 

[Sweeper2000]

Yeh fair points all round really. I was just thinking with the talk about baby f the day before it would seem they are going in chronological order. Unless someone can think of a pattern between the relevant cases?

 

[Tortoise]

Yeh fair points all round really. I was just thinking with the talk about baby f the day before it would seem they are going in chronological order. Unless someone can think of a pattern between the relevant cases?

They didn't specify which baby their insulin question was about did they?

I'll dig it out

eta:

During the day, a question rose from the jury, asking for clarification on how long it would take for insulin and insulin c-peptide levels to return to normal in a baby after manufactured insulin is stopped.

The judge replied there had been no evidence heard in respect of that. He said the recordings of the insulin and insulin c-peptide ratio were from blood samples analysed and the results were relayed to the hospital days later, when the babies' blood sugar readings had returned to normal.

Lucy Letby trial jury sent home after resuming deliberations

 

[Parker Knoll]

Never try and second guess the jury !

 

[gc105]

I’m nightshift tonight and tomorrow, what’s the bets the jury return a verdict whilst I’m sleeping, having followed the case intently for 9+ months

 

[gc105]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Dotta]

I’m nightshift tonight and tomorrow, what’s the bets the jury return a verdict whilst I’m sleeping, having followed the case intently for 9+ months

It will save you from shredded nerves.
Sleep tight!

 

[Sweeper2000]

Fairs fair and that’s all very fair. I can totally see them going with the m charges and then the AM Though. I wish we knew more. Is interesting though, the insulin charges seemed to be the most concrete so why look at those later On in the deliberations?